期刊文献+

前景理论在重症医学临床决策中的应用 被引量:2

The Application of Prospect Theory in Decision-making for Critical Care Medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 临床决策是每一个医生每天面临的工作,正确的临床决策不仅可以带给患者较好的结果,同时也可以让医生与患者及家属沟通更加良好。本文首先论述了重症医学的临床决策特点,每一个救治方案的收益与损失的权衡不仅仅是取决于患者病情,而且与决策者的风险偏好有明显关系。为了更好地解决这个问题,把诺贝尔奖获奖者丹尼尔的前景理论引入到重症患者的临床决策中,根据临床预期实现的不同概率进行分类,从行为心理学的角度进行分析,根据患者及家属的预期来确定是否实施某一特定的救治方案。以1例外科二次手术的决策过程为例说明了前景理论的实际应用,在临床上较好地平衡了收益与损失的关系,取得了良好的效果,初步说明前景理论在重症医学的临床决策中具有一定价值。 Medical decision-making is the work that doctors should face everyday, the correct medical decision-making will not only bring preferable consequence to patients, but also make a better communication for doctors with patients and their families. The thesis firstly explains the medical decision-making's characteristic of critical care medicine, to consider the benefit or loss in every treatment, which not only depends on the patient's condition, but also relates to the risk preferences of the decision makers. To solve the problem, the author introduces the Prospect Theory by Daniel--a Nobel Prize Winner into the medical decision making of critical care cases, to determine whether to implement a specific treatment programs by the classification of different probabilities in clinical expected, analysis from the behavioristic psychology, expectation of patients and the families. The author cites a decision of secondary surgery procedures to explain the practical application of the prospect theory, which can gives a balance between benefit and loss and achieved good results, preliminary illustrating the value of prospect theory in decision-making for critical care medicine.
出处 《医学与哲学(B)》 2014年第1期1-3,15,共4页 Medicine & Philosophy(B)
基金 广东省中医药局立项资助 项目编号:20121170
关键词 前景理论 重症医学 临床决策 Prospect Theory, critical care medicine, medical decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献30

  • 1张大庆.临床决策:医学哲学研究的一个重要领域[J].医学与哲学,2004,25(12):17-20. 被引量:35
  • 2钱伟长.关于非线性科学[J].自然杂志,1995,17(1):1-3. 被引量:15
  • 3李萍萍.临床决策:医患交流与合作的过程[J].医学与哲学(B),2007,28(8):4-5. 被引量:8
  • 4BARON J. Thinking and Deciding(3rd ed) [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 5http://www. smdm. org, 2004 - 11 - 24.
  • 6CEBUL R D & BECK L H. Teaching Clinical Decision Making[M].NY: Praeger Publishers, 1985,4.
  • 7http://www. psycho- oncology. net/mdmu. html, 2004 - 11 - 24.
  • 8EDDY D M. Clinical Decision Making[ M]. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 1996.
  • 9MEROPOL N J, ROSS B, ARMSTRONG C. Decision making and communication regarding cancer trcatment and prevention [ R]. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Scientific Report, 200, 1 - 3.
  • 10BECK J R, PAUKER S G. The Markov proccss in medical prognosis[J]. Med. Decis. Making. 1983; 3(4): 419-458.

共引文献144

同被引文献10

  • 1孙一奎.医旨绪余[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1983,8..
  • 2郭霭春编著.黄帝内经素问校注语释[M].贵阳:贵州教育出版社,2010:36-37.
  • 3周学海著.读医随笔[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1983:141.
  • 4裘沛然著.壶天散墨[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2011:47.
  • 5The ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respirato- ry distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition [ J ]. JAMA, 2012, 307(23) : 2526 -2533.
  • 6Lonardo M. Intra-abdominal hypertension is not reliable as an early predictor of mortality in the in- tensive care unite J ]. Minerva Anesthesiol, 2007, 73(9) : 447 -450.
  • 7张寅主编.分析的力量[M].北京:中信出版社,2014:36.
  • 8樊代明.整合医学初探[J].医学争鸣,2012,3(2):3-12. 被引量:240
  • 9陈全福,张敏州,郭力恒,唐光华,颜芳.重症医学最具备中西医结合的优势突破点[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2012,32(7):869-871. 被引量:5
  • 10严火其.智者察同 愚者察异:对东西方科学的一种哲学解读[J].江海学刊,2002(6):50-56. 被引量:6

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部