略论新社会风险及其与传统风险的区别被引量：1

View on New Social Risks and Its Differences From Traditional Risks

下载PDF

导出

摘要当代社会、经济和科技产生了许多新发展,而现代社会的这些进步也同时带来许多风险与危机。随着主要资本主义国家从工业社会逐步进入后工业社会,"新社会风险"作为社会政策领域的一个新视角逐渐兴起。新社会风险视角不仅给社会政策理论带来了新的转变,而且对各国的福利改革也产生了深远的影响。各工业国家都开始强调在知识经济和后工业社会的背景下,应该重新审视福利保障制度原则,加强社会包容,建立一个以应对"新社会风险"为主的福利国家。基于此,研究新社会风险的概念内涵及其与传统风险的区别,不仅有利于我们更好地把握西方发达国家福利改革的新动向,而且对正处于转型时期的中国来说,也将为我们的社会保障制度改革提供诸多借鉴。 Modern society, economy and technology brings about great developments as well as a lot of risks and crisises. With main capitalist countries have been transforming from industrial society to postindustrial society, new social risks are emerging as a new perspective in the field of social policy. The perspective of new socail risks not only brings new changes to the theory of social policy, but has a profound impact on many countries＆#39; welfare reform. Industrial countries have begun to emphasize re-examining the principle of welfare system, strengthening social inclusion and answering to new social risks under the background of postindustrial society. So, studying on the concept connotation of new risks and its difference from traditional risks will help us to understand the new tendency of welfare reform in western developed countries. Above all, it can also provide experience and reference to China＆#39;s social security system reform.

作者张航

机构地区南京大学

出处《电子科技大学学报（社科版）》 2013年第6期1-6,共6页 Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)

关键词社会风险社会政策传统风险新风险社会转型社会保障 social risks social policy traditional risk new risks social transformation social security

分类号 C3 [社会学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献21

1TAYLOR-GOOBY P. New Risks,New Welfare:The Transformation of the European Welfare State[M].{H}Oxford:Oxford University Press,2004.
2BONOLI G. Political Institutions,Veto Points,and the Process of Welfare State adaptation[M].{H}Oxford:Oxford University Press,2001.
3RICHARDS S,JONES G. Financial aspects of longevity risk[EB/OL].http://www.sias.org.uk/daia/papers/Long-evity Risk/DownloadPDF,2004.
4BLAKE D,BURROWS W. Survivor bonds:helping to hedge mortality risk[J].The Journal of Risk and Insurance,2001,(2):339-348.
5SWISS R. Annuities:A Private Solution to Longevity Risk[J].Sigma,2007,(3).
6阿瑟?刘易斯.二元经济论[M]{H}北京:北京经济学院出版社,1989.
7PRIBBLE J. Women and Welfare in Chile and Uruguay:The Politics of Coping with New Social Risks in Chile and Uruguay[J].{H}LATIN AMERICAN RESEARCH REVIEW,2006,(41):84-111.
8SCHOEPFLE G K,PEREZ-LOPEZ J F. Work Without Protections:Case Studies of the Informal Sector in Developing Countries[M].Washington D.C.:U.S.Department of Labor,1993.
9CONTRERAS, VICTORIA. Medición del Sector Informal[A].Santiago:International Labor Organization,2003.
10PIERSON P. The New Politics of the Welfare State[J].{H}WORLD POLITICS,1996,(1):143.

二级参考文献24

1[英] 保罗·皮尔逊编.《福利制度的新政治学》,汪淳波、苗正民译,商务印书馆2004年版,第663页.
2Peter Taylor-Gooby ed.,Welfare States under Pressure,London;Thousand Oaks,Calif.:SAGE,2001.
3Bernhard Ebbinghaus,"From Path Dependence to Path Departure in Welfare Reform Analysis",European Politics & Society Newsletter,Spring/Summer 2006,Vol.5,No.2,pp.1-4.
4Esping-Andersen Gфsta ed.,Welfare States in Transition:National Adaptations in Global Economies,London;Thousand Oaks;New Delhi,Sage Publications,1996,p.9.
5Esping-Andersen Gфsta,Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies,New York:Oxford University Press,1999.
6Esping-Andersen Gфsta ed.,Why We Need a New Welfare State,New York:Oxford University Press,2002.
7Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli eds.,The Politics of Post-industrial Welfare States:Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks,London;New York:Routledge,2006.
8Peter Taylor-Gooby ed.,New Risks,New Welfare:The Transformation of the European Welfare State,Oxford:Oxford University Press,2004.
9Peter Taylor-Gooby ed.,New Risks,New Welfare:The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford:Oxford University Press,2004,p.6.
10Bernhard Ebbinghaus,"Trade Union Movements in Post-indusrial Welfare State",in Klaus Armingeon and Giuliano Bonoli eds.,The Politics of Post-industrial Welfare States:Adapting Post-war Social Policies to New Social Risks,London;New York:Routledge,2006,pp.123-142.