期刊文献+

颈椎人工间盘植入与融合固定后生物力学有限元比较分析 被引量:2

Finite element analysis on biomechanics of cervical spondylosis treated with artificial cervical disc replacement vs.anterior cervical decompression and fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究颈椎人工间盘植入与前路融合内固定术后颈椎邻近节段的活动度、椎体及椎间盘内应力改变等生物力学分布的差异。方法选取湖北医药学院附属东风医院脊柱外科采用两种手术方法治疗的单节段颈椎病患者,采用螺旋CT扫描分别获取在前屈、后伸、侧屈及旋转几种状态下的颈椎椎体、椎间盘、韧带断层图像,在Mimics软件中重建三维结构,然后导入Ansys10.0软件分别建立有限元模型。并求解计算,分析术后患者的颈椎结构变化及椎体终板接口的位移变化和应力分布,比较研究载荷传导、生物力学分布及稳定性情况的差别。结果人工颈椎椎间盘置换术后患者的邻近节段活动基本正常,融合术后患者邻近节段的活动丧失达65%~75%。人工颈椎间盘置换术后患者邻近节段椎体及椎间盘内应力变化较小,融合术后患者在受到压力时,邻近椎间盘内应力增加明显,内植物与终板接口处应力集中。结论人工颈椎间盘置换对邻近节段的生物力学影响很小,并不影响颈椎的正常活动。 Objective To explore the difference in biomechanicaI effects of artificial cervical disc replacement vs. anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Methods CT scans were performed on the patients who respec- tively underwent the two operations in the Spine Surgery of Dongfeng Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine. After these images were processed, the three dimensional finite element model was established by software Mimics and Ansysl0. {I in order. After the loadings were placed on all the models, the difference in biomechanical and the distribution of Von Mises stress of the fused segment were analyzed and compared. Results The artificial cervical disc replacement allowed to correctly reproduce a physiological motion at the implanted level. The fusion reduced the mobility at its level by about 65^-75Y00 for the considered loading cases. Moreover, the fusion resulted in a higher increase in the ad)acent discs in compression, on the contrary, the prosthesis produced little changes in adja- cent segments. The artificial cervical disc prosthesis well restored the biomechanical behavior of the intact spine and produced little effect on the adjacent segments. Conclusion The artificial cervical disc prosthesis well restores the biomechanical behavior of the intact spine and produces little effect on the adjacent segments.
出处 《骨科》 CAS 2014年第1期16-19,共4页 ORTHOPAEDICS
关键词 颈椎 椎间盘 脊柱融合术 生物力学 有限元分析 Cervical vertebrae Intervertebral disk Spinal fusion Biomeehanics Finite element analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1李冰,王沛,李晖,刘保华,冯世庆,马信龙.Bryan颈椎间盘置换术与颈前路减压椎间融合术术后疗效的系统评价[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2009,19(7):497-501. 被引量:6
  • 2崔志明,贾连顺,周许辉,李卫东,徐冠华,保国锋,孙郁雨,王玲玲,朱乐银,崔颖.Bryan人工颈椎间盘置换治疗脊髓型颈椎病8例[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2009,13(9):1764-1768. 被引量:7
  • 3Yoganandan N,Kumaresan S,Pintar FA. Biomechanics of the cervical spine Part 2.Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling[J].Clin Biomech(Bristol Avon),2001,(01):1-27.
  • 4Yoganandan N,Kumaresan S,Pintar FA. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments[J].Journal of Biomechanical Engineering,2000,(06):623-629.doi:10.1115/1.1322034.
  • 5Teo EC,Ng HW. Evaluation of the role of ligaments,facets and disc nucleus in lower cervical spine under compression and sagittal moments using FA method[J].Medical Engineering & Physics,2001,(03):155-164.
  • 6Hilibrand AS,Carlson GD,Palumbo MA. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis[J].Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,1999,(04):519-528.
  • 7Hilibrand AS,Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion[J].SPINE JOURNAL,2004,(6 Suppl):190S-194S.
  • 8王岩,肖嵩华,陆宁,张雪松,刘郑生,刘保卫,张永刚,张西峰,王征,毛克亚.单双节段Bryan颈椎间盘假体置换术后1~8个月临床资料分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(1):14-17. 被引量:24
  • 9Duggal N,Pickett GE,Mitsis DK. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty[J].Neurosurg Focus,2004,(03):E9.
  • 10Maiman DJ,Kumaresan S,Yoganandan N. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments[J].Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering,1999,(01):27-38.

二级参考文献44

  • 1王岩,肖嵩华,陆宁,张雪松.颈人工椎间盘假体置换术的临床应用[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(21):1333-1337. 被引量:34
  • 2夏磊,李军伟.颈椎融合及融合后邻近节段的退行性变[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(46):122-124. 被引量:6
  • 3邹德威,谭荣,张瑞娟,马华松,周雪峰,邵水霖,白克文.人工椎间盘置换术治疗颈椎间盘疾患的早期观察[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(2):90-94. 被引量:19
  • 4Ozgen S,Naderi S,Ozek MM,et al. A retrospective review of cervical corpectomy:indications,complications and outcome. Acta Neurochir(Wien). 2004;146(10):1099-1105.
  • 5Geck MJ,Eismont FJ. Surgical options for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33(2):329-348.
  • 6Goffin J,Geusens E,Vantomme N,et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(2):79-85.
  • 7Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR,et al. Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery. 2002;50(2):229-236.
  • 8Xia L,Li JW. Zhongguo Linchuang Kangfu. 2005;9(46):122-124.
  • 9Seo M,Choi D. Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality? Br J Neurosurg.2008;22(2):195-199.
  • 10Lemcke J,Menz H,AI-Zain F, et al. Outcome after cervical anterior fusion-a clinical study of 368 patients. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007;145(6):744-752.

共引文献33

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部