期刊文献+

平行放置双接骨板治疗肱骨远端C型骨折的临床疗效观察 被引量:4

Clinic observation of the therapeutic effectiveness of distal humerus based parallel-plate for type C fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨平行放置双接骨板治疗肱骨远端C型骨折的临床疗效。方法 2010年1月至2012年12月,采用用肱三头肌"舌"形瓣或鹰嘴"V"形截骨入路切开复位平行双接骨板内固定治疗21例肱骨远端C型骨折,按AO分型,其中C1型7例、C2型9例、C3型5例。结果经平均10.6个月随访,骨折均愈合,无感染、骨不连、内固定失败的发生。随访时按Mayo肘关节功能评分(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)评分系统进行评估:优7例、良9例、可4例、差1例,优良率为76.2%。结论平行放置双接骨板治疗肱骨远端C型骨折固定可靠,可周期活动,是一种理想固定方法。 Objective To investigate the curative effectiveness of internal fixation methods in treatment of type C fractures of the distal humerus by using the parallel-plate. Methods From January 2010 to December 2012, 21 patients with AO type C distal humerus fracture, including 7 cases of type CI, 9 cases of type C2, and 5 cases of typeC3, were treated with ORIF with the Dorsal-plate. The posterior midline approach was selected, and the intercondylar fracture ends were exposed through the olecranon osteotomy or liguliform flap of triceps brachii muscle. Results Parallel-plate had the better efftects in load-compressed displacement, load-strain and load-rigidity. Twenty-one cases were followed up from 8 to 18 months. MEPS scores were used for evaluating the result of the surgery and the complications were analyzed, including 7 cases of excellent effectiveness, 9 cases of good, 4 cases of fair, and one case of poor. The excellent and good rate was 76.2~. Concision Parallel-plate is an effective methed for type C fractures of the distal humerus, and can maintain the stability of facture and early activity.
出处 《骨科》 CAS 2014年第1期23-25,共3页 ORTHOPAEDICS
关键词 肱骨骨折 外固定器 治疗结果 Humeral fractures External fixator Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Tyllianakis M,Panagopoulos A,Papadopoulos AX. Functional evaluation of comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (AO type C).Long term results in twenty-six patients[J].Acta Orthopaedica Belgica,2004,(02):123-130.
  • 2Liu JJ,Ruan HJ,Wang JG. Double-column fixation for type C fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly[J].Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,2009,(04):646-651.doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.012.
  • 3Korner J,Diederichs G,Arzdorf M. A biomechanical evaluation of methods of distal humerus fracture fixation using locking compression plates versus conventional reconstruction plates[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2004,(05):286-293.doi:10.1097/00005131-200405000-00004.
  • 4Frankle MA,Herscovici DJ,DiPasquale TG. A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intraarticular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2003,(07):473-480.doi:10.1097/00005131-200308000-00001.
  • 5O'Driscoll SW. Optimizing stability in distal humeral fracture fixation[J].Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,2005,(Suppl S):186S-194S.
  • 6Stoffel K,Cunneen S,Morgan R. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures[J].Journal of Orthopaedic Research,2008,(06):778-784.doi:10.1002/jor.20528.
  • 7Shin SJ,Sohn HS,Do NH. A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures[J].Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery,2010,(01):2-9.
  • 8Korner J,Lill H,Muller LP. The LCP-concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fracturese biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects[J].Injury,2003,(Suppl 2):B20-B30.

同被引文献77

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部