期刊文献+

骨质疏松对老年患者转子间骨折愈后的影响 被引量:4

Effect of anti-osteoporosis treatment on healing of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 通过对老年患者转子间骨折术后的相关资料进行分析,探讨髋部骨折术后早期应用抗骨质疏松治疗对患者预后的影响.方法 采用回顾性研究方法,以我院骨科收治的2011年3月至2013年3月术前因低能量损失致转子间骨折的95例患者进行回顾性研究并随访,分析骨折愈合时间,内固定失败率,髋部Harris功能评分,髋部再骨折情况及病死率.结果 所有患者均顺利完成手术,并早期活动下肢.抗骨质疏松治疗组骨折愈合时间为2.0~3.0个月,平均2.6个月;非抗骨质疏松组为3.0~7.0个月,平均4.1个月.内固定失败率:抗骨质疏松组(5.2%)与非抗骨质疏松组(11.1%)相比更低.末次随访Harris评分:抗骨质疏松组(平均89.5分)相比非抗骨质疏松组(平均83.0分)更高.髋部再骨折均未发生.抗骨质疏松组病死率(6.5%)较非抗骨质疏松组(11.1%)低.结论 转子间骨折术后早期应用抗骨质疏松治疗患者骨折愈合时间短,内固定失败率低,病死率低,疗效满意. Objective To investigate the early use of anti-osteoporosis treatment after operation of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures to find the effect of this treatment on healing of the hip fractures. Methods A total of 95 patients with low energy-induced intertrochanteric fractures from March 2011 to March 2013 in our hospital were retrospectively studied. The fracture healing time, fixation failure rate, Harris score, hip re-fracture and mortality were analyzed. Results All cases have been successfully operated, and achieved early activity of lower limb. Fracture healing time in anti-osteoporosis treatment group and non-anti-osteoporosis group was 2. 6 months (2-3 months) and 4. 1 months (3 7 month). The internal fixation failure rate in anti-osteoporosis group (5.2%) was lower than in non-anti-osteoporosis group (11. 1%). The mean Harris score in anti-osteoporosis treatment group (89.5) was higher than in non-anti-osteoporosis group (83.0). There was no hip refracture. The mortality in anti osteoporosis group (6. 5%) was lower than in non-anti-osteoporosis group (11. 1%). Conclusion Early use of anti osteoporosis treatment after operation of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients makes better effectiveness.
出处 《骨科》 CAS 2014年第1期29-31,共3页 ORTHOPAEDICS
关键词 髋骨折 骨质疏松 老年人 回顾性研究 Hip fractures Osteoporosis Aged Retrospective studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献55

  • 1张经纬,蒋垚,张先龙,冯建翔,杨立峰,赵刘军,吴志军,黄雷,曾炳芳.股骨转子间骨折不同手术方法比较[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(1):7-11. 被引量:389
  • 2朱锦宇,朱庆生,韩一生,吴尧平,刘建,李明全,袁志.老年不稳定型转子间骨折的内固定选择及术后并发症原因分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(6):505-507. 被引量:46
  • 3Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, et al. Incidence and mor- tality of hip fractures in United States.JAMA, 2009, 302(14): 1573- 1579.
  • 4Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, et al. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric farctures: an evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(8): 1273-1276.
  • 5Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand, 1980, 51(5): 803-810.
  • 6Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, et al. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1995, 77(7): 1058-1064.
  • 7Guven M, Yavuz U, Kadioglu B, et al. Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by dynamic hip screw. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2010, 96(1): 21-27.
  • 8Palm H, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, et al. Integrity of the lateral femo- ral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: an important predictor of a reoperation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2007, 89(3): 470-475.
  • 9Wong TC, Chiu Y, Tsang WL, et al. A double-blind, prospective, ran- domised, controlled clinical trial of minimally invasive dynamic hip scvew fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury, 2009, 40(4): 422- 427.
  • 10Xu YZ, Geng D, Yang H, et al. Treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: comparion of the proximal femoral nail antirotation and gamma nail. Orthopedics, 2010, 33(7): 473.

共引文献114

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部