摘要
行政协力义务是指行政相对人在行政活动中基于法律的规定为实现行政目标而做出一定行为或不作一定行为的义务。突发公共卫生事件应急规则为行政相对人设定了相应的协力义务,这一设定自身并不能因设定而正当,也不能仅因为满足公共利益的实现而具有天然的正当性,而是以行政过程、行政法律关系理论为分析工具强调并引导行政相对人自愿认同而服膺以证明其正当。本文拟通过对突发公共卫生事件现有规则中行政协力义务规定的局限性分析,提出相应的法律控制建议。
Administrative cooperation obligation is the obligation that administrative private parties shall do or avoid certain action in administrative activities based on the provisions of the laws and administrative targets. In addition,rules on preparedness for and response to emergent public health hazards impose corresponding administrative cooperation responsibilities on administrative private parties. The imposition mentioned above can not demonstrate its justification,nor get the natural justification only because the public interest is realized. Its justification is merely testified by the uncontrolled voluntary approval of administrative private parties with the theories of the process of administration and administrative legal relations as the tool of analysis. The corresponding suggestions of legal control are proposed through analyzing limitations of the rules on administrative cooperation obligations in the existing administrative rules and regulations on emergent public health hazards.
出处
《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》
北大核心
2014年第1期100-106,112,共7页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
基金
教育部人文社科青年基金项目"强制医疗法律关系研究"(项目号:10YJC820054)的阶段性研究成果