期刊文献+

人格判断的准确性:信息数量和质量的作用 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 良好的信息是影响人格判断准确性的重要调节变量,信息是否良好取决于信息的数量和质量。信息数量假设认为,判断者对判断目标的人格信息了解越多,其人格判断越准确。当信息数量有限时,内隐人格理论和假定相似性会通过额外信息影响判断的准确性。在信息数量相同的条件下,信息质量决定了判断的准确性。对于准确的人格判断,价值信息比事实信息更有效,私密信息比公开信息更重要。此外,情境强弱对行为信息的质量有重要影响。判断者与判断目标的熟悉度和关系质量是获取信息的关键。未来的研究应着手解决信息数量与质量的量化、人格判断的生态效度及其与其他变量交互作用等问题。
作者 陈少华 曾毅
出处 《华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期69-74,81,共7页 Journal of East China Normal University:Educational Sciences
基金 广州市哲学社会科学规划课题(2012GJ42)
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1陈少华,赖庭红,吴颢.关系质量对人格判断的影响及其对教育的启示[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2012,34(2):55-59. 被引量:7
  • 2陈少华,吴颢,赖庭红.人格判断的准确性:特质特性的作用[J].心理科学进展,2013,21(8):1441-1449. 被引量:9
  • 3Aronson,E.,Wilson,T.D.,&Akert,R.M.(2012).社会心理学(第7版).侯玉波等译.北京:世界图书出版公司,100-133.
  • 4Funder,D.(2009).人格谜题(第4版).许燕等译.北京:世界图书出版公司,132-147.
  • 5Ames, D. R. (200g). Strategies for social inference : A similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prev- alence estimates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 573 -585.
  • 6Anderson, S. M. (1984). Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46,294 -307.
  • 7Beer, A. , & Brooks, C. (2011). Information quality in personality judgment: The value of personal disclosure. Journal of Re- search in Personality, 45, 175 -185.
  • 8Beer, A. , & Watson, D. (2008). Asymmetry in judgments of personality: Others are less differentiated than the self. Journal of Personality, 76, 535 -560.
  • 9Beer, A. , & Watson, D. (2010). The effects of information and exposure on self-other agreement. Journal Research in Personality, 44, 38 -45.
  • 10Biesanz, J. C. , Human, L. J. , Paquin, A. C. ,Chan, M. , Parisotto, K. L. , Sarracino, J. , & Gillis, R. L. (2011). Do we know when our impressions of others are valid? Evidence for realistic accuracy awareness in first impressions of personality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2,452 - 459.

二级参考文献77

  • 1FUNDER D C,KOLAR D C,BLACKMAN M C.Agreementamong judges of personality:Interpersonal relations,similarity,and acquaintanceship[J].Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology,1995,69:656–672.
  • 2BEER A,BROOKS C.Information quality in personalityjudgment:The value of personal disclosure[J].Journal ofResearch in Personality,2011,45:175–185.
  • 3VAZIRE S.Who knows what about a person?The self–otherknowledge asymmetry(SOKA)model[J].Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology,2010,98:281–300.
  • 4WATSON D,HUBBARD B,WIESE D.Self-other agreementin personality and affectivity:The role of acquaintanceship,trait visibility,and assumed similarity[J].Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology,2000,78:546–558.
  • 5LETZRING T D,WELLS S M,FUNDER D C.Informationquantity and quality affect the realistic accuracy of personalityjudgment[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006,91:111–123.
  • 6FUNDER D C,COLVIN C R.Friends and strangers:Acquaintanceship,agreement,and the accuracy of personalityjudgment[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1988,55:149–158.
  • 7BORKENAU P,LIEBLER A.Convergence of stranger ratingsof personality and intelligence with self-ratings,partnerratings,and measured intelligence[J].Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology,1993,65:546–553.
  • 8FUNDER D C.On the accuracy of personality judgment:arealistic approach[J].Psychological Review,1995,102:652–670.
  • 9MURRAY S L,HOLMES J G,GRIFFIN D W.Theself-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romanticrelationships:Love is not blind,but prescient[J].Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology,1996,71:1 155–1 180.
  • 10HAYES A F,DUNNING D.Construal processes and traitambiguity:Implications for self-peer agreement in personalityjudgment[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1997,72:664–677.

共引文献11

同被引文献69

  • 1余苏闽,王凯,高皓.上市公司ESG表现如何影响商业信用?[J].投资研究,2023,42(3):60-78. 被引量:6
  • 2王双进,田原,党莉莉.工业企业ESG责任履行、竞争战略与财务绩效[J].会计研究,2022(3):77-92. 被引量:128
  • 3林毅夫,孙希芳.信息、非正规金融与中小企业融资[J].经济研究,2005,40(7):35-44. 被引量:1045
  • 4曾颖,陆正飞.信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J].经济研究,2006,41(2):69-79. 被引量:748
  • 5Balsis, S. , Cooper, L. D. , & Oltmanns, T. F. ( 2014 ). Are in- formant reports of personality more internally consistent than self - reports of personality? Assessment,21 ( 1 ), 1 - 6.
  • 6Beer,A. (2013). Group personality judgments at zero acquaint- ance: Communication among judges versus aggregation of in- dependent evaluations. Journal of Research in Personality, 47 (4),385 - 389.
  • 7Beer,A. , Watson, D. , & MeDade - Montez, E. ( 2013 ). Self - other agreement and assumed similarity in neuroticism, extra- version, and trait affect: Distinguishing the effects of form and content. Assessment,20 (6) ,723 - 737.
  • 8Berscheid,E. ,Snyder, M. ,& Omoto,A. (1989). The relation- ship closeness inventory:Assessing the closeness of interper- sonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychol- ogy,57(5 ) ,792 - 801.
  • 9Chart, M. , Rogers, K. H. , Parisotto, K. L. , & Biesanz, J. (2011). Forming first impressions : The role of gender and normative accuracy in personality perception. Journal of Re- search in Personality ,45( 1 ) , 117 - 120.
  • 10Colvin,C. R. , & Funder, D. C. ( 1991 ). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 ( 6 ), 884 - 894.

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部