期刊文献+

哲学之思:进路与境域 被引量:1

Thoughts on Philosophy——Development and Realm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 哲学作为智慧的探索,具有超越知识界限的特点。然而,随着哲学的学科化、专业化,哲学往往被限定于特定领域,由此导致哲学的知识化。哲学之思的进一步展开,以超越哲学的知识化为前提,后者要求以道观之。在形式的层面,哲学作为以理论思维的方式把握世界的形态,具体表现为运用概念的活动,后者同时表现为所谓说理。哲学与哲学的历史无法相分。哲学史首先是哲学,哲学的创造性思考则不能从无开始,而是需要基于历史中形成的思维成果,这里包含史与思之间的互动。同时,自中西哲学在近代相遇以后,中西哲学的关联、互动,就成了一个无法回避的问题。以道观之、智慧追寻,主要表现为形上视域,与之相对的是形下之域,在哲学之思中,形上与形下之间难以截然相分。 Philosophy, often believed as an exploration of wisdom, manifests its features beyond the knowledge boundary. However, with its disciplinizaiton and specialization, philosophy has always been confined to a specific domain, which results in the knowledge-based trend. With the development of philosophical thinking, it is strongly recommended that philosophy should have its own way from the perspective of "Dao" beyond the knowledge. As far as the form is concerned, philosophy, a means of understanding the physical world by the theoretical thinking, manifests itself on the activities of notion application; meanwhile, it is also presented in the way of reasoning. Moreover, philosophy and philosophical history are closely interrelated. Philosophical history, first and foremost, is philosophy; while the creative thinking of philosophy is not likely to be developed without the historical achievements, including the interaction between thinking and history. Ever since the meeting of eastern and western philosophy, their relationship, as well as interaction, becomes an unavoidable issue in the philosophical field. Thus, the idea of "observing from the perspective of Dao and pursuing the wisdom" is proposed, manifesting itself in the difference between metaphysical and physical realms, both of which can not be abruptly divided from the point of view of philosophical thinking.
作者 杨国荣
出处 《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期34-38,共5页 Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金重大项目"中国文化的认知基础与结构研究"(10&ZD064) 教育部基地重大研究项目"实践智慧:历史与理论"(11JJD720004)的研究成果
关键词 哲学 以道观之 概念分析 史与思 philosophy Observing from the perspective of Dao , notional analysis history and thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Nietzsclle. Beyond Good and Evil,205, The Philosophy of Nie- tzche[ M] NY : Random Hose,1927. 501.
  • 2Heidegger. What is Called Thinking? [ M]. NY. : Haper Peren nial, 1976.7.
  • 3WileJd Sells. Plailosoplay and flae Scientific Image 0 Man[M]// Kevin Sc}ap, RoBert Brandmn. The ,Sp'e of Reason. Cam]aridge, Mass: Hm'd University Press,2007.

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部