期刊文献+

缬沙坦对门静脉高压性胃病大鼠胃黏膜组织TGF-β1/Smad信号传导通路的影响 被引量:1

Valsartan improves portal hypertensive gastropathy in rats possibly via TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨缬沙坦对门静脉高压性胃病大鼠胃黏膜病变的疗效和作用机制.方法:48只♂SD大鼠随机分为假手术组、门静脉高压性胃病模型组、缬沙坦预防组、缬沙坦常规剂量组和缬沙坦加倍剂量组.采用部分门静脉主干缩窄法制备门静脉高压性胃病模型.免疫组织化学染色法检测各组大鼠胃黏膜组织转化生长因子-β1(transforming growth factor-β1,TGF-β1)表达、微血管密度(microvessel density,MVD),Western blot分析胃黏膜组织Smad2、Smad7蛋白表达.ELISA法检测各组血清肾素(plasma renin activity,PRA)、血管紧张素Ⅱ(angiotensinⅡ,AngⅡ)、谷氨酸转氨酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)、白蛋白(albumin,ALB)水平.结果:缬沙坦预防组、常规剂量组和加倍剂量组胃黏膜组织中TGF-β1(11.58±2.27,13.29±2.82,13.15±3.36)明显低于造模组(24.25±3.48)(P<0.05);缬沙坦预防组、常规剂量组和加倍剂量组胃黏膜微血管密度值(12.08±2.34;13.13±1.42;12.04±1.02)亦明显低于造模组(17.09±5.52)(P<0.05);缬沙坦预防组、常规剂量组和加倍剂量组胃黏膜组织中Smad2蛋白表达(0.86±0.59,0.82±0.36,0.83±0.49)较造模组(1.60±0.77)明显下降(P<0.05),但高于假手术组;Smad7蛋白表达(1.59±0.72,1.65±0.80,1.69±0.85)较模型组(0.58±0.35)明显升高(P<0.05),但低于假手术组.缬沙坦预防组、常规剂量组和加倍剂量组血PRA(16.49 ng/mL±2.77 ng/mL;15.92ng/mL±4.30 ng/mL;16.72 ng/mL±5.48 ng/mL)、AngⅡ(1664.44 pg/mL±285.47 pg/mL,1686.82 pg/mL±499.16 pg/mL,1734.07 pg/mL±326.66 pg/mL)水平较模型组(11.49 ng/mL±2.12 ng/mL,1110.38 pg/mL±193.85 pg/mL)比较明显升高(P<0.05,P<0.01).结论:缬沙坦能够改善门静脉高压性胃病大鼠胃黏膜微血管病变,可能是通过下调TGF-β1、Smad2表达,上调Smad7表达发挥作用. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and mechanisms of action of valsartan on portal hypertensive gastropathy in rats with gastric mucosa lesions. METHODS: Forty-eight SD rats were randomly divided into a sham-operated group, a portal hypertension gastropathy group, a valsartan prevention group, a normal dose valsartan group and a high dose valsartan group. Portal hypertensive gastropathy was induced by the partial portal vein ligation method. Gastric mucosa TGF-beta1 expression and microvessel density (MVD) were detected by immunohistochemical staining method. Gastric mucosa Smad2 and Smad7 protein expression was detected by Western blot. Plasma levels of rennin activity (PRA), angiotensin II (Ang II), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and albumin (ALB) were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Compared with the model group, gastric mucosa TGF-β1 (11.58 ± 2.27, 13.29 ± 2.82, 13.15 ± 3.36 vs 24.25 ± 3.48, all P 〈0.05) and Smad2 (0.86 ± 0.59, 0.82±0.36, 0.83 ± 0.49 vs 1.60 ± 0.77, P 〈 0.05) protein expression was significantly decreased in the valsartan prevention group, normal dose valsartan group and high dose valsartan group. Smad7 protein expression in the valsartan prevention group, normal dose valsartan group and high dose valsartan group was significantly higher than that in the model group (1.59 ± 0.72, 1.65 ± 0.80, 1.69 ± 0.85 vs 0.58 ± 0.35, all P 〈 0.05). Plasma PRA (16.49 ng/mL ± 2.77 ng/mL, 15.92 ng/mL ± 4.30 ng/mL, 16.72 ng/mL ± 5.48 ng/mL vs 11.49 ng/mL ± 2.12 ng/mL, all P 〈0.05) and Ang II (1664.44 pg/mL ± 285.47 pg/mL, 1686.82 pg/mL ± 499.16 pg/mL, 1734.07 pg/mL ± 326.66 pg/mL vs 1110.38 pg/mL ± 193.85 pg/mL, all P 〈0.01) were also significantly higher in the valsartan prevention group, normal dose valsartan group and high dose valsartan group than in the model group. CONCLUSION: Valsartan can improve portal hypertensive gastropathy probably by down-regulating TGF-β1 and Smad2 expression and up-regulating Smad7 expression.
出处 《世界华人消化杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第1期9-16,共8页 World Chinese Journal of Digestology
基金 上海市普陀区卫生系统自主创新科研基金资助项目 No.普科委[2010]33号~~
关键词 缬沙坦 门静脉高压性胃病 转化生长因子-Β1 信号传导 Valsartan Portal hypertensive gastropathy Transforming growth factor-beta 1 Signal transduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献99

共引文献116

同被引文献27

  • 1陈军,吴性江,黎介寿.门静脉内注射葡聚糖微球制成猪门静脉高压症模型[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(6):755-756. 被引量:8
  • 2李栋,张乐玲,侯怀水,时庆,沈柏均.四氯化碳诱导兔肝硬化模型的动态研究[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(14):1403-1407. 被引量:14
  • 3王瑞祥,宣正荣,裴振安,邓跃华,于东风,万圣云,王光升,王蔚萱.门静脉内注射PVA制作犬肝内型门脉高压症模型[J].肝胆外科杂志,1996,4(4):241-243. 被引量:5
  • 4Geerts AM, Vanheule E, Praet M, et al. Comparison of threeresearch models of portal hypertension in mice : macroscopic, histological and portal pressure evaluation [ J ]. Int J Exp Pathol,2008,89 : 251 - 263.
  • 5WangY K, C hiB R, Su nB, et al. Establishmentandstability ofhepatic cirrhosisratmodels[ J ]. JiliDaxueXuebao ( Yixueban ), 2005,31 : 893 - 895.
  • 6Fitzhugh OG, Nilsson A. Liver tumours in rats fed thiourea or thioacetamide [ J ]. Science, 1948,108 ( 5 ) :626 - 628.
  • 7Ling H, Roux E, Hempel D, et al. Transforming growth factorβ neutral ization ameliorates pre-exist-ing hepatic fibrosis and reduces cholangiocarcinoma in thioacetamide-treated rats [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8 ( 1 ) : e54499.
  • 8Muller A, Machnik G, Zimmermann T, et al. Thioacetate indueedcir-rhosis like lesion in rats : usefulness and reliability of this animal model [ J ]. Exp Pathol, 1988,34 (4) :229 - 236.
  • 9David P, Alexandre E, Chenard-Neu MP, et al. Failure of livercirrhosis induction by thioacetamide in Nagase analbuminaemicrats[ J]. Lab Anita,2002,36 ( 2 ) : 158-164.
  • 10Jeong DH ,Jang J J, Lee SJ,et al. Expression patterns of cell eyclerelated proteins in a rat cirrhotic model induced by CC 14 orthioacetamide [ J ]. J Gastroentem1,2001,36( 1 ) :24-32.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部