期刊文献+

基于数据包络分析的隧洞施工仿真多方案评价与优选 被引量:13

Project evaluation and optimization of tunnel construction using DEA simulation and analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对以往隧洞施工仿真多方案优选采用基于特尔菲法用线性加权求解的多目标规划存在主观认识依赖程度高、加权系数缺少依据、缺乏后分析等问题,本文建立了耦合进度和成本的隧洞施工仿真数据包络分析(DEA,Data Envelopment Analysis)多目标综合评价模型,结合工程实例,对隧洞施工方案进行了综合评价与优选。在评价中,采用DEA模型分析了不同方案的相对有效性,方案的优劣顺序,使隧洞施工仿真多方案优选有了统一的评价准则,运用投影定理获得了其他非有效方案失效原因,并与多目标规划法进行了对比,结果表明DEA方法便于决策者对施工方案进行调整和分析,为决策者提供了科学的依据。 We developed a DEA multi-objective evaluation model of tunnel construction simulation to couple project schedule and cost and overcome the shortcomings of traditional evaluation based on multi-objective programming, i.e. highly dependent on subjective cognition, difficult to define weighted coefficient and short of post analysis. This new model was applied to analysis on the relative efficiency of different practical projects, the rank of project superiority, and the failure causes of non-effective projects. The results show that, in comparison to the traditional method, the DEA method gives objective evaluations and provides optimization suggestions for project design.
出处 《水力发电学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期234-240,共7页 Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51179121) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金(51021004) "十二五"国家科技支撑计划(2011BAB10B06)
关键词 隧洞施工仿真 多方案评价与优选 DEA多目标综合评价模型 进度 成本 tunnel construction simulation project evaluation and optimization DEA multi-objective evaluation model schedule cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献30

  • 1何静.只有输出(入)的数据包络分析及其应用[J].系统工程学报,1995,10(2):48-55. 被引量:58
  • 2赵鸣雁,程春田,武新宇.定性方法与MCDEA模型在调水方案评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2005,23(4):58-60. 被引量:4
  • 3吴钢.中小型反击式水轮机选型方案优化选择[J].水电能源科学,1996,14(2):120-126. 被引量:3
  • 4Chua D K H, Li D. Key Factors in Bid Reasoning Model[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2000,126(5) : 349-357.
  • 5Ahmad I. Decision-support System for Modeling the Bid/No Bid Decision Problem [J]. Journal of Con- struction Engineering and Management, 1990, 116 (4) :595-607.
  • 6Wanous M,Boussabaine A, Lewis J. To Bid or Not To Bid: A Parametric Solution [J]. Construction Management and Economies,2000,18(4) :457-466.
  • 7Li Zhanghua,Zhu Yan.Classification method for fuzzy quality synthetic evaluation [ A ].The 3rd International Conference on Management by National Natural Science Foundation of China [C].Shanghai,China,1998.
  • 8Charnes A,Cooper W W,Rhodes E.Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J].Eur.J.Opl.Res.,1978,2 (6):429-444.
  • 9Charnes A,Cooper W W,Wei Q L,Huang Z M.Cone ratio date envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming [J].Int.J.System Sci.,1989,7 (20):1099-1118.
  • 10魏权龄.评价相对有效的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988..

共引文献34

同被引文献89

引证文献13

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部