期刊文献+

豆纹动脉供血区巨大腔隙梗死6例报告(附文献复习) 被引量:3

Report of 6 cases and literature review on giant lacuna infarction in the lenticulostriate arterial territory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 摘要目的:探讨脑豆纹动脉供血区巨大腔隙性梗死的定义、发病机制、临床和影像学特点,并与腔隙性脑梗死相鉴别。方法:分析6例豆纹动脉供血区巨大腔隙梗死患者的临床表现、实验室和影像学特征,并结合文献复习进行研究。结果:6例患者头颅MRI均显示基底节区、放射冠、半卵圆中心连续3~7个层面新鲜梗死灶。病灶长径1.9~4.0cm,符合豆纹动脉供血区巨大腔隙的诊断。结论:巨大腔隙的机制、病因、治疗及预后均不同于经典的腔隙性脑梗死,对影像表现为豆纹动脉供血区梗死的病例,应鉴别巨大腔隙与腔隙性脑梗死,有利于进一步治疗和判断预后。 Abstract Objective:To investigate the definition,pathogenesis,clinical features and imaging characteristics of giant lacuna infarction in the lenticulostriate arterial territory,and distinguish it with lacunar infarction,in order to improve the understanding of this disease.Methods:The clinical manifestations,laboratory and imaging fea- tures of 6 cases of giant lacuna infarction in the lenticulostriate arterial territory were analyzed and the litera- ture was reviewed.Results :The 6 cases showed continuous 3-7 sections and major axis 1.9-4.0cm of fresh in- farcts in basial ganglion,corona radiate and the region besides the lateral ventricle ,conforming to the diagnosis of giant lacuna infarction in the lenticulostriate arterial territory.Conclusion:The pathogenesis,causes,treatment and prognosis of giant lacuna infarction were different from lacunar infarction.As to the cases of cerebral in- farction in the lentieulostriate arterial territory,giant lacuna infarction should be suspected and differentiated from lacunar infarction to direct further treatment and judge prognosis.
出处 《中日友好医院学报》 2014年第1期7-10,14,F0002,共6页 Journal of China-Japan Friendship Hospital
关键词 巨大腔隙 腔隙性脑梗死 豆纹动脉 分支动脉粥样硬化病 内囊纹状体梗死 Key words giant lacuna lacunar infarction lenticulostriate artery branch atheromatous disease striatocapsularinfarcts
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1刘俊艳,王瑜玲,刘玮,魏娟红,李春岩.大脑中动脉狭窄脑深部小梗死发病机制的研究[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志,2005,5(4):244-247. 被引量:3
  • 2Khan U,Porteous L,Hassan A,et al.Risk factor profile ofcerebral small vessel disease and its subtypes [J].J NeurolNeurosurg Psychiatry,2007,78 : 702-706.
  • 3杨任民,徐银.分支动脉粥样硬化病附3例报告及文献复习[J].中国临床神经科学,2010,18(4):396-400. 被引量:8
  • 4Caplan LR.Intracranial branch atheromatous disease : A ne-glected understudied, and underused concept [J],Neurology,1989,39:1246-1250.
  • 5Yamamoto Y,Ohara T,Hamanaka M,et al.Characteristics ofintracranial branch atheromatous disease and its associationwith progressive motor deficits[J].J Neurol Sci,2011,304(1-2):78-82.
  • 6Bladin PF,Berkovic SF.Striatocapsular infarction: large in-farcts in the lenticulostriate arterial territory [J].Neurology,1984,34(11):1423-1430.
  • 7Bang OY, Heo JH, Kim JY,et al.Middle cerebral arterystenosis is a major clinical determinant in striatocapsularsmall,deep infarction[J].Arch Neurol,2002,59(2) :259-263.
  • 8Terai S,Hori T,Miake S,et al.Mechanism in progressive la-cunar infarction : a case report with magnetic resonanceimaging[J].Arch Neurol,2000,57 :255-258.
  • 9Steinke W,Ley SC.Lacunar stroke is the major cause ofprogressive motor deficits[J].Stroke,2002,33: 1510-1516.
  • 10Donnan GA,Bladin PF,Berkovic SF,et al.The stroke syn-drome of striatocapsular infarction [J].Brain, 1991,114 (Pt1A) :51-70.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Horowitz DR, Tuhrim S, Weinberger JM, et al. Mechanisms in lacunar infarction. Stroke, 1992, 23:325-327.
  • 2[2]Thajeb P. Large vessel disease in Chinese patients with capsular infarcts and prior ipsilateral transient ischaemia. Neuroradiology,1993, 35:190-195.
  • 3[3]Bogousslavsky J, Regli F. Centrum ovale infarcts: subcortical infarction in the superficial territory of the middle cerebral artery. Neurology, 1992, 42:1992-1998.
  • 4[4]Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, et al. Arterial territories of the human brain: cerebral hemispheres. Neurology, 1998, 50:1699-1708.
  • 5[5]Bladin PF, Berkovic SF. Striatocapsular infarction: large infarcts in the lenticulostriate arterial territory. Neurology, 1984, 34:1423-1430.
  • 6[6]Nelson PF, Pullicino P, Kendall BE, et al. Computed tomography in patients presenting with lacunar syndromes. Stroke, 1980, 11:256-261.
  • 7[7]Fisher CM. Capsule infarcts: the underlying vascular lesions. Arch Neurol, 1979, 36:65-73.
  • 8[8]Lyrer PA, Engelter S, Radu EW, et al. Cerebral infarcts related to isolated middle cerebral artery stenosis. Stroke, 1997, 28:1022-1027.
  • 9[9]Wong KS, Huang YN, Gao S, et al. Intracranial stenosis in Chineses patients with acute stroke. Neurology, 1998, 50:812-813.
  • 10[10]Bogousslavsky J, Barnett HJ, Fox AJ, et al. Atherosclerotic disease of the middle cerebral artery. Stroke, 1986, 17:1112-1120.

共引文献9

同被引文献32

  • 1脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损程度评分标准(1995)[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):381-383. 被引量:15747
  • 2张春玲,徐忠宝,曲媛,何青.腔隙性脑梗死102例患者的脑血流动力学分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2006,39(9):587-590. 被引量:20
  • 3中华神经科学会.中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管疾病诊断要[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,42(6),60-61.
  • 4Samuels OB, Joseph G J, Lynn M J, et al. A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterialstenosis[ J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradio|, 2000.21:643,.
  • 5Swartz RH, Bhuta SS, Farb RI, et al. Intracranial arterial wall ima- ging using high resolution 3 tesla contrast enhanced MRI[ J]. Neu- rology ,2009,72 : 627.
  • 6Fayad ZA , Fuster V. Characterization of atherosclerotic plaques by magnetic resonance imaging [ J ]. Ann NY Acad Sci , 2000,902 : 173.
  • 7Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, et al. Comparison of symptomatic and a- symptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2006,240: 464.
  • 8Saam T, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Predictors of carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression as measured by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging[ J ]. Atherosclerosis, 2007,194 : e34.
  • 9Ryu CW, Kwak HS, Jahng GH, et al. High-Resolution MRI of In- tracraniaI Atherosclerotic Disease[ J]. Neurointervention, 2014, 9 : 9.
  • 10Chen XY, Wong KS, Lam WW, et al. Middle cerebral artery ather- osclerosis: Histological comparison between plaques associated with and not associated with infarct in a postmortem study[ J]. Cerebro- vasc Dis, 2008, 25: 74.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部