期刊文献+

企业社会责任的制度起源及其法律价值 被引量:7

On the Origin of Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Legal Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 古已有之的伦理道德孕育着企业的社会责任。大公司的出现与所有权与经营权的分离催生了管理者资本主义,管理者资本主义开始挑战自由经济及其所信奉的利润最大化原则,从而产生现代企业的社会责任思想。企业社会责任是法律责任、道德责任及"软法"责任的统一,而法律责任是企业社会责任的核心和底线。正义、秩序、效率是企业社会责任立法的价值目标。企业的社会责任既有私法社会本位的深厚基础,又有自身的特性,其目标是为了实现企业与利益相关者、环境与社会之间的持续健康发展。 Ancient ethics and morals were pregnant with corporate social responsibility (CSR). The emergence of large companies and the separation of ownership and controlling right have given birth to manager capitalism. Manager capitalism challenged free economy and the principle of profit maximization, and modern CSR thinking came into being. CSR includes legal liability and "soft law" liability, and legal liability is the nucleus and baseline of CSR. The legal values of CSR are oriented toward justice, order and efficiency. CSR is not only deeply based on society-orientation principle, but also has its own characteristics. The object of CSR is to realize the continuous and fine development between corporation, society, stakeholders, and environment.
作者 殷慧芬
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第1期92-97,共6页 Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金 上海市教委科研创新项目(12Z189)
关键词 企业社会责任 两权分离 法律责任 社会本位 法律价值 corporate social responsibility separation of ownership and controlling right legal liability social-orientation principle legal value
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1周友苏,宁全红.历史与现实:公司社会责任本土资源考察[J].法治论坛,2010(1):121-137. 被引量:2
  • 2O.C.费雷尔.约翰·弗雷德里克,琳达·费雷尔著,陈阳群译.商业伦理:伦理决策与案例[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
  • 3Adolf A. Berle, Gardiner C. Means. the Modern Corporation and Private Property[M]. New Brunswick: Transaction Pub- lishers, 1932(refprinted in 1991), part IV.
  • 4Adolf A Berle. Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust[J]. Har- vard Law Review, 1931, 44(7) : 1049- 1074.
  • 5Theodore I.evitt. The Dangers of Social Responsihility[J]. Har- vard Business Review, 1958, 36(5): 41-45.
  • 6甘培忠,雷驰.公司社会责任的制度起源与人文精神解构[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,47(2):119-125. 被引量:20
  • 7Howard R. Bowen. Social Responsibilizies of the Businessman[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1953.
  • 8Davis, Keith. Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibili- ties? [J]. California Management Review, 1960, 2: 70-76.
  • 9Committee for Economic Development. Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations[R]. CED, New York, 1971.
  • 10Keith Davis, Robert I,. Blomstrom. Business, Society, and Environment[M]. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1971.

二级参考文献122

共引文献723

同被引文献124

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部