期刊文献+

美罗培南个体化治疗慢性阻塞性肺病并发铜绿假单胞菌感染患者的研究 被引量:5

Study on individual treatment of meropenem for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease combined with Pseudomonas aeruginosainfection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨美罗培南个体化治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)并发铜绿假单胞菌感染患者的效果及安全性。方法将COPD并发铜绿假单胞菌感染的患者分成2组(个体化剂量组、标准剂量组)进行治疗,统计分析美罗培南对2组患者的疗效及安全性。结果个体化剂量组患者的美罗培南平均剂量为每12h(0.86±0.09)g,低于标准剂量组;个体化剂量组治疗的有效率为81.3%,2组间有效率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。个体化剂量组患者不良反应的发生率低于标准剂量组(P<0.05),标准剂量治疗对肾功能有一定损伤,而个体化剂量能减轻美罗培南对肾功能的损伤。结论美罗培南的个体化给药不仅能在保证疗效的前提下提高治疗的安全性,还能降低对肾功能的损害。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of meropenem for COPD combined with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in- fection. Methods The patients, suffered from COPD combined with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, were divided into two groups (dose group,standard dose group) according to the ways of treatment. Then we analyzed and evaluated the meropenem effi- cacy and safety in these two groups. Results Compared with the standard dose group,the dose of meropenem in personalized group was lower [-(0.86±0.09)g/12 hi. The effective rate of personalized dose group was a little higher than in the standard dose group, but there was no significant difference (P〈0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of personalized dose group was significantly lower than the standard-dose group (P〈0.05). Considerate renal injury was found in standard-dose group while only a little was found in personalized dose group. Conclusion Personalized administration of meropenemn can improve the safety of therapy in the premise of ensuring efficacy,also it can reduce the renal damage.
出处 《国际检验医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第3期290-291,294,共3页 International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
关键词 肺疾病 慢性阻塞性 假单胞菌 铜绿 美罗培南 个体化医疗 pulmonary disease,chronic obstructive pseudomonas aeruginosa meropenem individual treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Viegi G,Scognamiglio A,Baldacci S. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)[J].{H}RESPIRATION,2001,(1):4-19.
  • 2Murphy TF,Brauer AL,Eschberger K. Pseudomonas aerugi-nosa in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].Am Am J Re-spir Crit Care Med,2008,(8):853-860.
  • 3Sethi S. Bacterial infection and the pathogenesis of COPD[J].{H}CHEST,2000,(5 Suppl 1):S286-S291.
  • 4Sethi S,Murphy TF. Infection in the pathogenesis and course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J].{H}New England Journal of Medicine,2008,(22):2355-2365.
  • 5周庆涛,贺蓓.美罗培南个体化给药的研究进展[J].中国抗生素杂志,2009,34(5):263-266. 被引量:22
  • 6Krueger WA,Bulitta J,Kinzig-Schippers M. Evaluation by Monte Carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infu-sion in healthy volunteers[J].{H}Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy,2005,(5):1881-1889.
  • 7Kuti JL,Nightingale CH,Knauft RF. Pharmacokinetic prop-erties and stability of continuous-infusion meropenem in adults with cystic fibrosis[J].{H}Clinical Therapeutice,2004,(4):493-501.
  • 8Lorente L,Lorenzo L,Martín MM. Meropenem(by continuous versus intermittent infusion in ventilator-associated pneumonia due to gram-negative bacilli[J].{H}Annals of Pharmacotherapy,2006,(2):219-223.
  • 9Nicolau DP. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of meropenem[J].{H}Clinical Infectious Diseases,2008,(z1):S32-S40.
  • 10Baldwin CM,Lyseng-Williamson KA,Keam SJ. Meropenem:a re-view of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections[J].{H}DRUGS,2008,(6):803-838.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Rhomberg P R, Jones R N. Antimicrobial spectrum of activity for meropenem and nine broad spectrum antimicrobials: Report from the MYSTIC Program (2002) in North America[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2003, 47( 1 ): 365 -372.
  • 2Conte J E, Golden J A, Kelley M G, et al. Intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem[J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2005, 26(6): 449 -456.
  • 3Abo EI-Sooud K. Plasma pharmacokinetics and urine concentrations of meropenem in ewes[J] . J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 2004, 27 ( 1 ) : 27 - 30.
  • 4Fish D N, Singletary T J. Meropenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic[J]. Pharmacotherapy, 1997, 17(4): 644 - 669.
  • 5Turnidge J D. The pharmacodynamics of beta-lactams[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 1998, 27(1): 10~22.
  • 6Drusano G L. Prevention of resistance: A goal for dose selection of antimlcrobial agents[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2003, 36 (Suppl 1 ): s42 - s50.
  • 7Bustamente C I, Drusano G L, Tatem B A, et al. Postantibiotic effect of imipenem on Pseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1984, 26 (5) : 678 - 682.
  • 8Lowe M N, lamb H M. Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections[J]. Drugs, 2000, 60(3):619-646.
  • 9Jarumtanasirikul S, Sriwiriyajan S. Comparison of the pharmaeodynamies of meropenem in healthy volunteers following administration by intermittent infusion or bolus injection[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2003, 52(3): 518 -521.
  • 10Jaruratanasirikul S, Sriwiriyajan S, Punyo J. Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 3-hour infusion or bolus injection(J]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005, 49(4): 1337 - 1339.

共引文献21

同被引文献39

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部