期刊文献+

宫颈环形电刀锥切术后阴道分娩的临床观察 被引量:3

Effect of cervical electrotome cone cut method on vaginal delivery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈环形电刀锥切术(LEEP)对分娩方式的影响,分析LEEP后自然分娩的产程特点。方法:选择既往行LEEP术、单胎、产前检查无剖宫产指征、自然进入产程的初产妇31例做为观察组,在其前及后或同时进入产程的无宫颈手术史的62例初产妇作为对照组,比较两组产程中的剖宫产率及产程的时间。结果:观察组产程中的剖宫产率为9.7%(3/31),对照组的剖宫产率为11.3%(7/62),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组总产程时间(9.2±2.1)h,对照组总产程(10.1±3.5)h,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组潜伏期(3.8±1.7)h,活跃期(4.2±2.1)h,对照组分别为(4.3±2.5)h和(4.7±1.6)h,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组均无宫颈裂伤病例。结论:LEEP不增加产程中的剖宫产率,不影响产程进展,不能作为剖宫产指征。 Objective: To detect the effects of cervical electrotome cone cut method on the mode of delivery and stages of labor. Methods: 31 cases who had undergone cervical loop electrosurgical excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (admitted from August 2008 to August 2013) were enrolled into the experimental group. 62 cases without cervical surgical operation were enrolled in control group. All the 93 cases were primiparas with singleton and cephalic presentation pregnancy and naturally entered the stages of labor. Results: The cesarean section rates were 9. 7% (3/31) and 11.1% (7/62) separately in experimental group and control group. There was no statistically significant difference in cesarean section rate ( P 〉 0. 05 ) between the two groups. The total stages of labor were (9. 2 ± 2. 1 ) h and (10. 1 ± 3.5) h respectively experimental and control groups. There was no statistically significant difference in total stages of labor (P 〉 0. 05 ) . The latent phase were ( 3.8 ±1.7 ) h in experimental group and (4. 3 ± 2. 5 ) h in control group, The active stage were (4. 2 ± 2. 1 ) h in experimental group and (4. 7±1. 6) h in control group, there were no statistically significant differences in latent phase and active stag (P 〉 0.05) . Conclusion : Cervical electrotome cone cut method might not increase the cesarean section rate during labor with no effect on the progress of labor.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第5期713-714,共2页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 宫颈环形电刀锥切术 宫颈内瘤变 剖宫产 Loop electroexcision Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Cesarean section
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Keijser KGG, Kenemans P, Van Der Zanden PH,et al. Diathermy loop excision in the management of cervical intraepithelial neo- plasia:diagnosis and treatment in one procedure [J] Am J Ob- stet Gynecol, 1992,166 : 1281 - 1287.
  • 2Haffenden DK, Bigrigg A, Codling BW. Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone [ J ] . Br J Ob- stetGynaecol, 1993, 100: 1059-1060.
  • 3Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, et al. Cervical treatment with LEEP or laser conization increased the risk of preterm delivery after preterm PROM[J] . Evid Obstet Gynecol, 2005, (7) : 64 - 65.
  • 4Kelly Orzechowski, Sara Nicholas, Vincenzo Berghella. Does cervical connization increase the risk of a sonographic short cer- vix in the second trimester of pregnancy?[J] . Am J Obst Gy- necol, 2013, (Supple J) : $217.
  • 5潘玲,贺晶.宫颈冷刀锥切术对生育能力及妊娠结局的影响[J].实用妇产科杂志,2012,28(6):471-475. 被引量:44
  • 6Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, et al. Long turin outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Re- prod Biol, 2003, 106 (2): 214-218.
  • 7Daniel Andia, Femando Mozo de Rosales, Amparo Villas- ante, et al. Pregnancy outcome in patients treated with cervi- cal conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [ J] . Inter J Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 112:225-228.
  • 8Van de Vijver A, Poppe W, Verguts J, et al. Pregnancy out- come after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the leuven University Hospital [ J] .BJOG, 2010, 117 (3) : 268 - 273.
  • 9T. Tsuburai, K. Kurasawa, M. Okuda, et al. Pregnancy out- come after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery [J] . Intern J Gynee Obstet, 2012 (119s3) : s759.
  • 10孟然,戚红.宫颈锥切术后妊娠结局临床分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2012,28(7):524-526. 被引量:21

二级参考文献25

  • 1贾金平.397例急产的临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(2):234-235. 被引量:11
  • 2贺豪杰,潘凌亚,黄惠芳,郎景和.宫颈锥切术对宫颈上皮内瘤变患者妊娠及其结局的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2007,42(8):515-517. 被引量:43
  • 3Van de Vijver A,Poppe W,Verguts J,et al. Pregnancy outcome after cervical conisation: a retrospective cohort study in the Leuven University Hospital[J]. BJOG, 2010, 117(3) :268 -273.
  • 4Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom, et al. Williams Obstetrics : the twenty-third edition [ M ]. The United States of America: The McGraw-Hill companies, 2010: 811.
  • 5Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom, et al. Williams Obstetrics : the twenty-third edition [M]. The United States of America: The McGraw-Hill companies, 2010: 804.
  • 6Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, et al. Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 106 (2) : 214 -218.
  • 7Grio R, Rizzitiello A, Colla F, et al. Therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fertility [ J ]. Minerva Ginecol, 2002, 54 ( 4 ) : 325 - 331.
  • 8Jakobsson M, Gissler M, Sainio S, et al. Preterm delivery after surgical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 109 (2,Pt 1): 309-313.
  • 9Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, et al. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy [ J ]. BJOG, 2010, 117 (3) : 258 - 267.
  • 10Bruinsma F, Lumley J, Tan J, et al. Precancerous changes in the cervix and risk of subsequent preterm birth[J]. BJOG, 2007, 114 (1) : 70 -80.

共引文献60

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部