期刊文献+

解构理论与身份认同 被引量:1

Derrida's Deconstructionism and Identity
原文传递
导出
摘要 以往学者在研究德里达解构思想来源时,总是将其无限拔高和提升,认为其思想必然来源于某种可以实指的、具体"思想形态",比如胡塞尔现象学、海德格尔存在主义、索绪尔语言学等等,实际上,这种从德里达的作品中抽出某些类似理论资源的做法,常常忽视了思想者本身的内在因素。德里达解构理论的产生与其特殊的身份或身份认同密切相关。以身份认同为切入点,德里达的一生可以分为三个阶段,在童年时期对"犹太出身"的"置疑"、青年时期对"法语"的"两难"以及成年对"权威(主流)"的"歧路"都是其身份认同的表现。因此,伴随德里达一生的"身份认同焦虑"从另一方面成就了解构理论:身份认同无处不在,解构理论如影随形。 In previous studies of the sources of Derrida's deconstructionism, scholars always infinitely extended the sources to some concrete, specific schools of thoughts, such as Husserl's phenomenology, Heidegger's existentialism, Saussure's lin- guistic theories, etc. They tried to extract from Derrida's works certain sources of theories. However, practices of this kind always overlook the internal factors of the thinkers. In fact, the coming into being of Derrida's deconstructionism has a lot to do with Derrida's special sense of identity. When his sense of identity is taken into concern, Derrida's life can be divided into three periods. His childhood is characterized by his "doubts" against his "Jewish origin," his teenage years by his "dilemma" of "French language," and his adulthood by his "branching off" from the "authoritative mainstream. " All these are but manifestations of his sense of identity. As a result, the "angst of identity" that runs through the lifetime of Derrida helps bring about Derrida's deconstructionism. In other words, Derrida's deconstructionism shadows his sense of identity.
出处 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期33-42,共10页 Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
关键词 德里达 解构 身份认同 Derrida Deconstruction Identity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1罗如春.《身份认同问题三论》,钱中文主编.《中国中外文艺理论学会年刊(2008年卷)--理论创新时代:中国当代文论与审美文化的转型》,北京:知识产权出版社,2009年,第280-293页.
  • 2德里达.《被劫持的言语》,《书写与差异》,张宁译,北京:三联书店,2001年.
  • 3[法]德里达.《我很难对一致性感到激动》,《南方周末》2004年10月21日.
  • 4胡继华.苦难意识与浪子情怀——试探德里达解构哲学的精神气质[J].社会科学战线,1994(5):61-67. 被引量:4
  • 5[法]福柯.《尼采、谱系学、历史学》,刘小枫、倪为国选编.《尼采在西方--解读尼采》,上海:上海三联书店,2002年,第285-286页.
  • 6单继刚.剑桥事件:权力、学科、文体[J].世界哲学,2005(2):7-8. 被引量:2
  • 7B.G.张,江振华.海德格尔的解释学与德里达的解构学[J].世界哲学,1990(3):25-32. 被引量:6
  • 8[美]玛丽安-霍布森.《可翻译性和可概括性》,陈喜贵译,冯俊等.《后现代主义哲学讲演录》,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第337-339页.
  • 9[法]陈力川.《德里达的最后一课》,乐黛云主编.《跨文化对话》(中法文化年专号),北京:三联书店,2005年,第63页.

二级参考文献1

  • 1.

共引文献10

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部