摘要
在政府主导型的中国经济发展模式亟待转型之际,林毅夫提出的新结构经济学引发了学术界的争论,其中产业政策的必要性成为争论的焦点之一。然而,有关争论基本上还停留在"要市场机制"还是"要政府干预"上,重点是产业政策的必要性。实际上,产业政策在世界各地普遍存在,而围绕产业政策必要性的争论在国际学术界已经降温。文章认为,产业发展过程中由于信息外部性和协调外部性而存在一定的市场失灵,这是国际学界的新共识。因此,关键不在于要不要产业政策,而是产业政策的施政如何能以"市场强化型"的方式来弥补市场不足、矫正市场失灵,而不是代替市场去主导资源配置,甚至由政府来"挑选赢家"。
Against the background of China's state -led economic development model in transition, Justin Lin's New Structural Economics attracts attention and sparks debate among Chinese economists. The necessity of in- dustrial policies is a focus of debate that is preoccupied with the ideologically colored choice between market mechanisms versus government intervention. In fact, industrial policies as a kind of government intervention ex- ist everywhere around the world, and the debate over the necessity of industrial policies has cooled down among international academics in the field of development studies. A newly emerging consensus prevails that market failure results from information and coordination externalities. Hence, the key is not whether industrial policies are needed, but rather how industrial policies could be implemented so as to enhance the market and correct market failure. The view that the government should replace the market in allocating resources and thereby pick winners is no longer predominant. We should develop a New Institutionalist - Strncturalist Development Eco- nomics by drawing insights from new institutionalism in economics, political science and sociology.
出处
《经济社会体制比较》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期231-241,共11页
Comparative Economic & Social Systems
关键词
产业政策
新结构经济学
发展型国家
挑选赢家
市场失灵
Industrial Policies
The New Structural Economics
The Developmental State
Picking - up Win- ners
Market Failure