期刊文献+

腹腔镜下不同手术入路治疗大体积肾癌的效果比较 被引量:19

Comparison of clinical outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic nephrectomy for large renal tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹腔镜治疗大体积(直径>7 cm)肾癌的入路对手术效果的影响。方法回顾性分析于2002年1月至2012年6月间就诊并接受腹腔镜根治性肾切除手术治疗,术后病理诊断为肾癌,病理提示肿瘤最大直径>7 cm的患者。统计经腹腔入路和经腹膜后入路患者各项围手术期信息,并分组进行比较。结果共60例患者被纳入进行分析。两组患者在基本情况、肿瘤位置等方面并无差异。5例手术中转开放术式。对于经腹腔入路组和经腹膜后腔入路组,平均手术时间分别为(218.6±27.6)min和(169.0±65.5)min(P=0.003)。在术中出血量、并发症、输血情况及术后住院时间等方面无统计学差异。术后对肿瘤的病理特点及肿瘤分级、分期进行评价,经腹腔入路所切除的肾肿瘤分期更高。结论采用腹腔镜手术治疗大体积肾癌安全可行,对于有一定腹腔镜手术基础的医师,对于经过仔细挑选的患者选择经腹腔或经腹膜后入路均可,对于不同的患者应选用合适的手术方案。术后的远期生存情况仍需进一步随访。 Objective To report the clinical experience of laparoscopic surgery for large renal tumors (larger than 7 cm in diameter) and to compare the outcome of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach. Methods We collect and analyzed the data of patients with renal tumors who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy from January 2002 to June 2012, with tumor size larger than 7 cm by pathology, and compared the peroperation outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach.Results We analyzed 60 patients from January 2002 to June 2012. Patients’ demographic data showed no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, preoperation sCr, ASA, tumor size and position. 5 were converted to open surgery during the procedure. Time of surgery were (218.6±27.6)min and (169.0±65.5)min (P=0.003), for transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach, respectively. No significant differences in blood loss, transfusion, complications, days of hospital stay postoperation were showed. Analysis of the pathologic features indicated that tumors with higher T stage were more likely resected with transperitoneal approach.Conclusion For large renal tumors, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is safe; transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for radical nephrectomy are safe and feasible. For experienced surgeons, transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches are all feasible and the surgery strategies should be made after fully evaluation of the patient and tumor features individually. Observation for long-term outcome is needed.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2013年第21期45-48,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
关键词 肾肿瘤 腹腔镜外科手术 肾切除术 根治性 经腹腔入路 经腹膜后入路 Kidney neoplasms Laparoscopic surgical procedures Nephrectomy,radical Transperitoneal approach Retroperitoneal approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Clayman RV,Kavoussi LR,Soper NJ. Laparoscopic nephrectomy:initial case report[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,1991.278-282.
  • 2Steinberg AP,Finelli A,Desai MM. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large(Greater than 7 cm,T2)renal tumors[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2004.2172-2176.
  • 3Hattori R,Osamu K,Yoshino Y. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large renal-cell carcinomas[J].{H}JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY,2009.1523-1526.
  • 4Dillenburg W,Poulakis V,Skriapas K. Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a:quality of life,pain and reconvalescence[J].{H}EUROPEAN UROLOGY,2006.314-322.
  • 5Kwon SY,Jung JW,Kim BS. Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Nephrectomy in T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma:Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes[J].Korean J Urol,2011.474-478.
  • 6Hemal AK,Kumar A,Kumar R. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors:a long-term prospective comparison[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2007.862-866.
  • 7Nambirajan T,Jeschke S,Al-Zahrani H. Prospective,randomized controlled study:transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy[J].{H}UROLOGY,2004.919-924.
  • 8方冬,李学松,谌诚,虞巍,郝瀚,何志嵩,周利群.经腹腔与腹膜后腹腔镜肾癌根治术疗效比较[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2013,18(2):126-129. 被引量:29
  • 9Fan X,Xu K,Lin T. Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].{H}BJU International,2013.611-621.
  • 10Desai MM,Strzempkowski B,Matin SF. Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2005.38-41.

二级参考文献11

  • 1CLAYMAN RV, KAVOUSSI LR, SOPER NJ, et al. Laparo- scopic nephrectomy: initial case report[J]. J Urol, 1991, 146 (2) :278-282.
  • 2GAUR D D, AGARWAL D K, PUROHIT K C. Retroperitone-al laparoscopic nephrectomy., initial case report[J]. J Urol, 1993, 149(1): 103-105.
  • 3NAMBIRAJAN,T,JESCHKE S, AL-ZAHRANI H, et al. Pro- spective, randomized contrlled study: transperitoneal laparo- scopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephreetomy[J]. U- rology, 2004, 64(5): 919-924.
  • 4DESAI MM, STRZEMPKOWSKI B, MATIN SF, et al. Pro- spective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retro- peritoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy[J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(1) : 38-41.
  • 5MCDOUGALL EM, AND CLAYMAN RV. Laparoscopic ne- phrectomy for benign disease., comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches[J]. J Endourol, 1996, 10 (1) : 45- 49.
  • 6NADLER RB, LEOB S, CLEMENS JQ, el at. A prospective study of laparoscopie radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors- is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best ap- proach[J]. J Urol, 2006, 175(4): 1230-1233.
  • 7TAUE R, IZAKI H, KOIZUMI T, et al. Transperitoneal ver- sus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a compara- tive study[J]. Int J Urol, 2009, 16(3):263-267.
  • 8周利群,张凯,何志嵩,李宁忱,张晓春,吴士良,郝金瑞,潘柏年,郭应禄.后腹腔镜下IUPU法建立腹膜后腔的简单性、安全性及实用性——1114例应用经验[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2010,31(5):311-314. 被引量:50
  • 9张卫玮,曹润福.经腹腹腔镜与后腹膜腹腔镜根治性肾切除治疗肾癌的Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(53):10002-10006. 被引量:18
  • 10刘荣耀,赵鹏举,李学松,谌诚,陈晓鹏,姚琳,郝瀚,张崔健,郝金瑞,何志嵩,周利群.经腹腔完全腹腔镜肾输尿管全长切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2011,43(4):531-534. 被引量:36

共引文献28

同被引文献173

引证文献19

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部