辨析原田禹雄对册封使录中钓鱼岛问题的误区

Analysis on Nobuo harada's Misconceptions about Diaoyu Islands in the Recorded History of the Canonization of Ryukyu

日本京都大学名誉教授井上清的著作《"尖阁列岛"——钓鱼岛列屿的历史剖析》从翔实的史料着手系统深入地探讨了钓鱼岛主权属于中国的事实。对此,原田禹雄专门著书《"尖阁诸岛"——读册封琉球使录》以反驳井上清的观点。文章通过对原田禹雄书中观点的逐一分析,不难发现该学者企图通过曲解册封使录中的史实来推翻井上清的观点,但由于其引据不当,考证粗疏,再加上大胆的主观臆想,反而从侧面证实了中国拥有钓鱼岛主权是不可磨灭的历史事实。

The book ＂Senkaku＂ Islands： the Historical Analysis on Diaoyu Islands by Kiyoshi Inoue, the hon- orary professor of Kyoto University of Japan, started from detailed historical data and investigated systematically the truth in depth that the sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands belongs to China. Nobuo harada refuted Kiyoshi Inoue＇s points in his book ＇~Senkaku＂ Islands： Reading ＂the Recorded History of the Canonization of Ryukyu.＂ From analyzing Nobuo harada＇s points in his book, this paper finds out that he is trying to overthrow Kiyoshi inoue＇s opinions by misinterpreting the historical facts in ＂the Recorded History of the Canonization of Ryukyu＂. However, based on in- appropriate and inauthentic proofs, and his subjective conjecture as well, Harada nobuo＇s discussion proves the in- delible historical fact that China owns the sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands.