期刊文献+

通风方式对有机肥发酵过程中理化性质的影响 被引量:3

Effects ofVentilation Modes on Physical and Chemical Properties in Organic Fertilizer Fermentation Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为寻找有机肥发酵的最佳通风方式,采取对比试验方法研究了不通通风方式对堆肥发酵过程中理化性质的影响。结果表明:不同通风方式堆肥发酵过程温度伴随氧气浓度的降低而升高,温度高于50℃或55℃天数以翻堆3次处理最多,氧气浓度以翻堆3次与间歇式通风相结合处理表现明显。不同通风方式发酵过程中总N含量呈上升趋势,总C、C/N比、有机质含量呈下降趋势,3个处理总养分含量、pH值差异较小,以翻堆3次与间歇式通风相结合处理成品率最高。总体上,以翻堆3次与间歇式通风相结合最有利于有机肥发酵。 In order to explore the best ventilation modes onorganic fertilizer fermentation, effects of different ventilation modes on physical and chemical properties during organic fertilizer fermentation process were studied. The results showed that the temperature of different ventilation modes increase with the decrease of oxygen concentration, the temperature over 50 ℃or 55℃ for turning 3 times were the highest, O2 concentration oi turning 3 times combined with intermittent ventilation showed ob- viously. Total N content in an upward trend, the total C.C/N.content of organic matter in a downward trend during fermenta- tion process of different ventilation modes; The total nutrient content, pH had a little difference in 3 treatments; The yield is highest in the mode of turn over 3 times combined with intermittent ventilation, it is the most beneficial to the fermentation of organic fertilizer in the mode of turn over 3 times combined with intermittent ventilation.
出处 《耕作与栽培》 2013年第4期3-5,25,共4页 Tillage and Cultivation
基金 贵州省烟草公司遵义市公司科技项目(合同号:2011-10)
关键词 通风方式 发酵 理化性质 ventilation mode fermentation physical and chemical properties
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献177

共引文献143

同被引文献75

  • 1许翔,王亮,程剑,袁东辉,葛丛华.便捷带式污泥脱水烘干技术[J].施工技术,2020(S01):1692-1693. 被引量:2
  • 2盛金良,朱强,杨志强.一种污泥好氧堆肥预处理混合破碎机的研制[J].环境工程,2009,27(S1):349-351. 被引量:1
  • 3戴芳,曾光明,袁兴中,胡天觉,时进钢.新型堆肥装置设计及其应用研究[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2005,6(2):24-28. 被引量:23
  • 4杨朝晖,刘有胜,曾光明,肖勇,杨恋.厨余垃圾高温堆肥中嗜热细菌种群结构分析[J].中国环境科学,2007,27(6):733-737. 被引量:14
  • 5Liao W , Liu Y , Liu C B . Acid hydro-lysis of fibers from dairy manure[J]. Bioresoureee Technology, 2006, 97(14) :1687-1695.
  • 6Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, et al. Im proved methane fermentation of chicken manure via am monia removal by biogas recycle-J3. Bioresource Tech nology, 2010, 101(16): 6368-6373.
  • 7Marti-Herrero J , Chipana M , Cuevas C , et al. Low cost tubular digesters as appropriate technology for wide- spread application: results and lessons learned from Bo- livia. Renewable Energy, 2014,71 : 156 - 165.
  • 8Terradas-Ill C H, Pham C H, Triolo J M, et al. Ther- mic model to predict biogas production in unheated fixed- dome digesters buried in the ground. Environ. Sci Tech- nol, 2014, 48: 3253-3262.
  • 9Marti-Herrero J, Alvarez R, Cespedes R, et al. Cow, sheep and llama manure at psychrophilic anaerobic co-di- gestion with low cost tubular digesters in cold climate and high altitude-J3. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 181:238-246.
  • 10Castril16n E , Marafi6n L , Ferndndez-Nava Y , et al. Thermophilic co-digestion of cattle manure and food waste supplemented with crude glycerin in induced bed reactor (IBR) (J3. Bioresource Technology, 2013,136: 73-77.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部