期刊文献+

中国芒幼苗对土壤干旱胁迫的生理响应 被引量:6

Physiological Responses of Miscanthus sinensis Seedlings to Soil Drought Stress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨中国芒幼苗对土壤干旱胁迫的生理响应.[方法]以中国芒幼苗为试验材料,对其在土壤干旱胁迫及复水条件下的生理特性进行了研究.[结果]轻度土壤干旱胁迫(处理1,10 d后复水)在胁迫初期,各指标均呈逐渐升高的趋势,复水后各指标与CK保持相对稳定;中度土壤干旱胁迫(处理2,15 d后复水)在胁迫初期,各指标显著升高,复水后,MDA、相对电导率、APX、GR均有所回升,SOD、POD、CAT、ASA、GSH降低速度变缓,但仍显著高于CK组;重度干旱胁迫(处理3,持续干旱胁迫)在胁迫处理初期,各指标显著升高,干旱胁迫后期,MDA、相对电导率继续升高,SOD、POD、CAT、APX、GR、ASA、GSH急剧下降,并显著低于CK.[结论]芒幼苗忍受土壤干旱胁迫的极限时间是20d,最佳复水时间是10 ~ 15 d. [Objective] The study aimed to discuss the physiological responses of Miscanthus sinensis seedlings to soil drought stress.[Method] The effect of soil drought stress on physiological properties of M.sinensis was studied.[Result] All indexes of M.sinensis rose at the earlier stage of light drought stress and recovered to a similar level of the control after M.sinensis seedlings were watered ; at the earlier stage of moderate drought stress,all indexes of M.sinensis increased significantly,but MDA,relative conductivity,APX and GR activity recovered after the seedlings were watered,while SOD,POD,CAT,ASA and GSH decreased more slowly; at the earlier stage of severe drought stress,all indexes of M.sinensis enhanced significantly,but at the later stage of severe drought stress,MDA and relative conductivity continued to rise,SOD,POD,CAT,APX,GR,ASA and GSH decreased significantly and lower than those of CK.[Conclusion] The limit time of M.sinensis seedlings standing drought stress was 20 d,and the best watering time was 10-15 d.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 2013年第30期12125-12128,12131,共5页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(DL12CA11)
关键词 中国芒 干旱胁迫 生理特性 Miscanthus sinensis Drought stress Physiological property
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1MUNNS R, TESTER M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance [ J ]. Annual Review of Plant Biology,2008,59:651 - 681.
  • 2关军锋,马春红,李广敏.干旱胁迫下小麦根冠生物量变化及其与抗旱性的关系[J].河北农业大学学报,2004,27(1):1-5. 被引量:47
  • 3LEWANDOWSKIA I,SCURLOCK J M O,LINDVALL E,et al. The devel- opment and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in US and Europe[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2003,25(4) :335 -361.
  • 4BRANSBY D I,ALLEN D J,GUTTERSON N,et al. Engineering advanta- ges,challenges and status of grass energy crops[J]. Plant Biotechnology for Sustainable Production of Energy and Co-products,2030,19(4) :209 - 227.
  • 5HUBER G W,CHHEDA J N ,BARRETF C J ,et al. Production of liquid al- kanes by aquous-phase processing of biomass-derived carbohydrates [J]. Science,2005,308 ( 5727 ) : 1146 - 1450.
  • 6SALVATORE COLLURA,BRUNO AZAMBRE,GISELE FINQUENEISEL, et al. Miscanthus x Giganteus straw and pellets as sustainable fules-Com- bustion and emission tests [ J ]. Environmental Chemistry Letters ,2006,4 (2) :75 -78.
  • 7HEATON E,VOIGT T,LONG S P. A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C-4 perennial biomass crops in relation tonitrogen, temperature and water [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2004,27( 1 ) :21 -30.
  • 8席庆国,洪浩.外来植物奇岗的生物学特征[J].草业科学,2008,25(2):26-28. 被引量:19
  • 9郝再斌,苍晶,徐仲.植物生理试验[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2004:142.
  • 10GIANNOPOLITIS C N,RIES S K. Superoxide dismutases. I. Occurrence in higher plants[J]. Plant Physiol ,1977 ,54 :309 -314.

二级参考文献120

共引文献491

同被引文献118

引证文献6

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部