期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

先进驾驶辅助系统人机交互界面评价方法研究 被引量：8

Evaluation Method Study of Human-Machine-Interface of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高先进驾驶辅助系统的人机交互界面设计品质,提出了利用驾驶模拟器对人机交互界面进行测试评价的方法,并通过对人机交互界面评价方法的分析,搭建了基于驾驶模拟器的测试平台,确定了相关测量参数。该评价方法可在先进驾驶辅助系统开发的早期阶段对备选的人机交互界面设计方案进行评价,可尽早发现人机交互界面设计中出现的问题并进行修正,减少了先进驾驶辅助系统的开发成本和周期。 To improve design quality of Human-Machine-Interface （HMI） of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems （ADAS）, a test evaluation method for HMI based on driving simulator is proposed. And through analysis of this evaluation method, a test platform based on driving simulator is constructed, and related measuring parameters are defined. This evaluation method can be used to evaluate HMI design plan in the early stage of ADAS development, which can identify the errors of HMI design as early as possible and revise timely and therefore the cost and time of ADAS development can be reduced.
作者 李霖 贺锦鹏 刘卫国 朱西产 孙东
机构地区 同济大学 浙江吉利汽车研究院有限公司 查尔莫斯理工大学
出处 《汽车技术》 北大核心 2014年第2期58-62,共5页 Automobile Technology
关键词 先进驾驶辅助系统 人机交互界面 驾驶模拟器 评价方法 Advanced driver assistance system, Human-machine interface, Driving simulator,Evaluation method
分类号 U467.524 [机械工程—车辆工程]
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Am ditis A,Andreone L,Polychronopoulos A. Design and development of an adaptive integrated driver-vehicle interface:overview of the AIDE project[R].2005.
  • 2谭浩,赵江洪,王巍.汽车人机交互界面设计研究[J].汽车工程学报,2012,2(5):315-321. 被引量：38
  • 3Hesse T,Engstr?m J,Johansson E. Towards user-centred development of integrated information, warning, and intervention strategies for multiple ADAS in the EU project interactive[D].Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction.Context Diversity,2011.280-289.
  • 4Auckland R A,Manning W J,Carsten O. Advanced driver assistance systems:Objective and subjective performance evaluation[J].{H}Vehicles System Dynamics,2008,(z1):883-897.
  • 5Weir D H. Application of a driving simulator to the development of in-vehicle human-machine-interfaces[J].IATSS Research,2010,(01):16-21.
  • 6Mcgehee D V,Leblanc D J,Kiefer R J. Human factors in forward collision warning systems：Operating characteristics and user interface requirements(No. J2400)[R].Warrendale,PA:Society of Automotive Engineers,2002.
  • 7Group D F W. Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems[M].Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers,2002.
  • 8Nielsen J. Quantitative studies：How many users to test[J].Alertbox,2006.2006.
  • 9Freund B,Risser M,Cain C. Simulated driving performance associated with mild cognitive impairment in older adults[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,2001,(04):S151-S152.
  • 10Freund B,Gravenstein S,Ferris R. Evaluating Driving Performance of Cognitively Impaired and Healthy Older Adults:A Pilot Study Comparing On-Road Testing and Driving Simulation[J].{H}Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,2002,(07):1309-1310.

二级参考文献23

  • 1SCHMIDT A, SP1ESSL W, KERN D. Driving Auto- motive User Interface Research [J]. IEEE Pervasive Com- puting, 2010(1-3), 85-88.
  • 2WANG J S, KNIPLING R R, GOODMAN M J. The Role of Driver Inattention in Crashes: New Statistics from the 1995 Crashworthiness Data System EC]//Proceeding of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Vancouver, Canada: [s.n.], 1996: 377-392.
  • 3STRAYER D L, DREWS F A. Profiles in Driver Dis- traction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers [J] . Human Factors, 2004, 46 (4) : 640-649.
  • 4KASS S J, COLE K S, STANNY C J. Effects of Dis- traction and Experience on Situation Awareness and Simulated Driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2007, 10(4) : 321-329.
  • 5KRUM D M, FAENGER J, LATHROP B, et al. All Roads Lead to CHI.. Interaction in the Automobile[C]// Proceeding of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Florence, Italy: [s.n.], 2008: 2387-2390.
  • 6NORMAN D A. Living with Complexity[M]. US: The MIT Press, 2010.
  • 7WALKER G H, STANTON N A, YOUNG M S. Hierarchical Task Analysis of Driving: A New Research TooI[C]//HANSON M A (Ed.). Contemporary Ergonomics, 2001 Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society, Cirencester, London: Taylor and Francis, 2001: 435-440.
  • 8MICHON J. A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models What Do We Know, What Should We Do?[C]//EVANS L, SCHWING R. (Ed.). Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, New York, USA.. Plenum Press, 2004: 485-524.
  • 9NOY Y I, LEMOINE T L, KLACHAN C, et al. Task Interruptability and Duration as Measures of Visual Distraction[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2004, 35(3), 207-213.
  • 10IQBAL S T, JU Y, HORVITZ E. Cars, Calls, and Cognition: Investigating Driving and Divided At- tention [C] //Proceeding of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, USA: [s.n.], 2011: 1281-1290.

共引文献37

同被引文献36

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

汽车技术
2014年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部