期刊文献+

融合图像质量评价指标的相关性分析及性能评估 被引量:107

Validation and Correlation Analysis of Metrics for Evaluating Performance of Image Fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 图像融合质量评价指标研究旨在提供一种高效、准确的方法,为融合模型选择、参数优化等问题提供支持.本文通过对现有指标的机理分析、指标性能检验与指标间相关性分析,提出一种客观评价指标集的遴选策略.本文首先将现有客观评价指标归为三类:基于统计的、基于信息的和基于人类视觉系统的;之后列举了类别内经典指标和最新指标;并在标准数据集上,使用正确排序指标对各图像融合客观评价指标的性能进行验证.结果表明,基于视觉系统类的指标性能普遍优于前两类.最后,利用Spearman相关系数挖掘各指标间的相关程度.实验表明,通过指标性能和相关系数可以选取合适的客观评价指标集. Image fusion performance evaluation aims at providing an efficient and accurate method for the fusion model choosing, parameter optimizing and the like. By analyzing the mechanism of existing metrics in theory and testing the performance of metrics and correlations with each other experimentally, the paper presents an effective metric set selection strategy. First of all, existing metrics are classified into three categories: statistics-based, information-based and human-visual-system based classes; secondly, we enumerate the classical or the latest metrics for each class. In addition, we test the performance of objective evaluating metrics in terms of correct ranking by running on a standard data set, and the results indicate that human-visual-system based metrics are superior to others. Finally, we explore correlations among metrics using Spearman correlation coefficient. Experimental results indicate that we can choose a proper objective evaluating metric set by means of performances and correlations of metrics.
出处 《自动化学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期306-315,共10页 Acta Automatica Sinica
基金 吉林省科技发展计划(20090468,20100508,201105017) 长春市科技计划(11KZ24)资助~~
关键词 图像融合 客观指标 性能分析 相关性分析 Image fusion, objective metrics, performance analysis, correlation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1杨春玲,陈冠豪,谢胜利.基于梯度信息的图像质量评判方法的研究[J].电子学报,2007,35(7):1313-1317. 被引量:62
  • 2Sheikh H R, Sabir M F, Bovik A C. A statistical evalu- ation of recent full reference image quality assessment al- gorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(11): 3440-3451.
  • 3Cheng G, Cheng L. Reduced reference image quality assess- ment based on dual derivative priors. Electronics Letters, 2009, 45(18): 937-939.
  • 4Suresh S, Babu R V, Kim H J. No-reference image quality assessment using modified extreme learning machine classi- tier. Applied Soft Computing, 2009, 9(2): 541-552.
  • 5Heeger D J, Teo T C. A model of perceptual image fi- delity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Confer- ence on Image Processing. Washington D.C., USA: IEEE, 1995. 343-345.
  • 6Bradley A P. A wavelet visible difference predictor. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 1999, 8(5): 717-730.
  • 7Wang Z, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, Simoncelli E P. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural simi- larity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612.
  • 8Wang Z, Bovik A C. Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2009, 26(1): 98-117.
  • 9Chang J, Alain B, Ostromoukhov V. Structure-aware er- ror diffusion. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2009, 28(5): 162.1-162.8.
  • 10Sheikh H R, Bovik A C. Image information arid visual qual- ity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(2): 430-444.

共引文献106

同被引文献727

引证文献107

二级引证文献447

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部