期刊文献+

研发网络分散化,组织学习顺序与创新绩效:比较案例研究 被引量:83

The Decentralization of the R&D Network, the Sequence of the Organizational Learning and the Innovation Performance: A Multi-case Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对两家大型民营企业的纵向比较案例研究,本文试图破解企业在一方面面对来自全球的激烈竞争,想要通过超本地搜寻获取知识资源以实现技术赶超,另一方面面对国内制度缺陷,技术落差巨大的现实背景,在执行研发走出去战略的同时担心面临巨额成本与风险,而陷入的两难困境。研究发现:首先,研发网络分散化/收敛化的过程中,4种组织学习顺序扮演了重要角色,分别为播种型、独奏型、咨询型和增强型组织学习顺序;其次,针对企业研发网络通过技术分散和地理分散进行演化的不同方式,企业选取不同的组织学习顺序与之相匹配;最后,与研发网络分散化相匹配的不同组织学习顺序能够显著促进企业创新绩效的提升。本文结论对于理解研发网络分散化与创新之间动态关系有着重要理论和实践意义。 After comparing two big private firms in China, we try to find out the solution to the thorny dilemma of the firms in the emerging markets regarding the R&D network: on the one hand, facing fierce competition around the world, they want to acquire knowledge through extra-local search strategy to achieve technological catch-up, on the other hand,facing domestic institutional defects and huge technology backwardness, they worry about the expensive cost and big risk if they choose to construct extra-local R&D network. Our results indicate that Seeding Learning Sequence, Soloing Learning Sequence, Consulting Learning Sequence, and Enhancing Learning Sequence are emerged, which play important roles in the process of R&D network decentralization. Moreover, along with how firms expand their R&D network by diversifying technologies or locations, different learning sequences will have different effects on short-term or long-term innovation performance. Our results have important theoretical and managerial implications.
出处 《管理世界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期137-151,188,共15页 Journal of Management World
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目<经济结构转型 研发网络情境下企业技术创新能力演化规律研究>(71132007) 国家自然科学基金知识网络双重嵌入 知识整合与制造型集群企业能力轨迹跃迁研究"(编号:71072112) 新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助 浙江大学管理学院浙商研究专项经费项目(博士生项目)的支持
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

二级参考文献200

  • 1梅永红,封凯栋.吉利造车现象——关于吉利自主创新的调研报告[J].中国软科学,2005(11):1-10. 被引量:24
  • 2谢伟.中国企业技术创新的分布和竞争策略——中国激光视盘播放机产业的案例研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(2):50-62. 被引量:46
  • 3Barney, Jay, 1991, "Firm Resources and Sustained Cornpetitive Advantage", Journal of Management, Vol. 17,pp.99-120.
  • 4Barreto, 1., 2010, "Dynamic ISapabilities: A Review oI Past Research and an Agenda for the Future", Journal of Management, Vol. 36,pp.256-280.
  • 5BusinessWeek, 2009, China as an Innovator, Not Just an Imitator, March 9.
  • 6Caste1, P. and E. Friedberg, 2010, "Institutional Change as an Interactive Process: The Case of the Modernization of the French Cancer Centers', Organization Science, Vol. 21 ,pp.311-330.
  • 7Child, John, 1997, "Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect", Organization Studies, Vol. 18,pp.43-76.
  • 8Dacin, M. T., J, Goodstein and W. R. Scott, 2002, "Institutional Theory and Institutional Change: Introduction to the Special Research Forum", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.45, pp.45-56.
  • 9Danneels, E., 2008, "Organizational Antecedents of Sec- ond-order Competences" , Strategic Management Journal, Vol.29, pp.519-543.
  • 10Dieleman, M. and W. M. Sachs, 2008, "Coevolution of Institutions and Corporations in Emerging Economies: How the Salim Group Morphed into an Institution of Suharto'S Crony Regime ", Journal of Management Studies, Vol.45 ,pp. 1274-1300.

共引文献244

同被引文献1302

引证文献83

二级引证文献854

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部