摘要
早期美国“公益辩护活动”有两种活动模式 :谋求组织化改革的模式与以日常业务为基盘开展的公益辩护的模式。在保护“公益”这个新兴利益时 ,作为巨大的法律机器与一般普通市民的具体问题间的媒介律师发挥了巨大作用。对比研究美国律师“公益辩护活动模式”与我国公益辩护活动 ,对于正确评价我国司法体制是否真正具有维护“公益”
This article is tried to introduce the public interest activities in United States. There are two kinds of model in these activities since 1960s. One is called the “organized reform”, and the other the “public legal services based the normal duties”. The author analyzed their characteristics and defects. It will be very instructive to compare the public legal services system in U.S.A. and in China.
出处
《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2000年第5期99-105,共7页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)