期刊文献+

化疗前后CEA水平变化在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者疗效评价和预后判断中的价值 被引量:5

Serum CEA levels for evaluation of chemotherapy efficacy and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者2周期化疗前后CEA水平变化评价影像学肿瘤疾病控制的效能和预后的价值,为2周期后是否调整治疗方案提供依据。方法回顾性分析53例NSCLC患者化疗前、2周期化疗后血液中CEA水平变化;应用ROC曲线评价CEA水平变化对于化疗后影像学疗效达疾病控制(DC)的评价效能;探讨CEA水平变化与预后的关系。结果CEA水平变化率评价DC的ROC曲线下面积为0.794,CEA水平变化率阈值为-34.0%,此时敏感度和特异度分别为80.0%和87.5%。CEA水平变化与DC呈明显正相关(r=0.526,P<0.01)。CEA变化阳性的患者肿瘤无疾病进展时间(PFS)明显长于阴性患者(中位值分别为6.87和2.77个月,P<0.05)。CEA水平变化及化疗周期数、体重变化均是预测PFS的独立预后因子(均P<0.05)。结论在CEA水平升高的晚期NSCLC患者中,2周期化疗前后CEA水平变化可以有效评价影像学DC和预测PFS,CEA水平变化可作为影像学评价的重要辅助工具,有利于全面评估疗效。 Objective To evaluate the chemotherapy efficacy and disease prognosis by using serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in patients with advanced non- smal celllung cancer (NSCLC). Methods The changes of serum CEA lev-els in 53 patients with NSCLC before and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Receiver operation char-acteristic (ROC) curve of CEA changes was used for evaluation of radiological disease control (DC). The correlation of CEA changes with progression- free survival (PFS) of patients were also analyzed. Results When the change rates of the CEA levels were used to evaluate DC of patients, the area of ROC curve was 0.794. Using cut- off value of- 34.0%CEA level changes, the sensitivity and specificity were 80.0% and 87.5%, respectively. Correlation regression analysis revealed that CEA change was positively correlated with DC (r=0.526, P〈0.01). Univariate survival analysis showed that the PFS in patients with CEA reduction was longer than those without CEA reduction(6.87 vs 2.77 months, P〈0.05). Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that CEA change was an independent factor for PFS in NSCLC patients (P〈0.05), as wel as chemotherapy cycles and weight loss (P〈0.05). Conclusion The changes of CEA levels can effectively evaluate DC and predict PFS in advanced NSCLC patients with in-creased CEA levels.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2014年第1期29-32,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 癌胚抗原 化疗 预测因子 预后 Carcinoma non- smal- celllung cancer Carcinoembryonic antigen Drug therapy Predictor factors Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Eisenhauer E A, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response e- valuation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (ver- sion 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45(2):228-247.
  • 2夏怡,赵百亲,应可净.血清CYFRA21-1、CEA检测对非小细胞肺癌的临床意义[J].浙江医学,2003,25(3):189-190. 被引量:4
  • 3Ishiguro F, Fukui T, Mori S, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a surrogate marker for the evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy in nonsmall cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Thorac Car- diovasc Surg, 2010,16(4):242-247.
  • 4Dehing-Oberije C, Aerts H, Yu S, et al. Development and valida- tion of a prognostic model using blood biomarker information for prediction of survival of non-smal;-cell lung cancer patients treated with combined chemotherapy and radiation or radiothera- py alone (NCT00181519, NCT00573040, and NCT00572325)[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2011, 81(2):360-368.
  • 5Wang C Y, Huang M S, Huang M H,et al. Persistently high serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels after surgery indicate poor prognosis in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Surg Res, 2010,163(2):e45-50.
  • 6Jin B, Huang A M, Zhong R B, et al. The value of tumor markers in evaluating chemotherapy response and prognosis in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Chemotherapy, 2010,56(6):417-423.
  • 7许崇安,苏贺,刘佳丽,李琳,邹华伟.血清癌胚抗原水平在评价表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗进展期非小细胞肺癌患者疗效和预后中的价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2011,33(6):436-441. 被引量:10
  • 8Ishiguro F, Fukui T, Mori S, et al. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as a surrogate marker for the evaluation of tumor response to chemotherapy in nonsmall cell lung cancer [J]. Ann Thorac Car- diovasc Surg, 2010, t6(4):242-247.
  • 9李玲,宋丽华,丁士超,张晓君,强玲,韩春燕,袁香婷,徐丹丹.癌胚抗原和细胞角蛋白19片段作为晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效评价指标的临床价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(11):850-854. 被引量:24
  • 10Ardizzoni A, Cafferata M A, Tiseo M, et al. Decline in serum car- cinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in pa- tients with advanced nonsmall cel! lung cancer[J]. Cancer, 2006, 107(12) :2842-2849.

二级参考文献43

  • 1宋丽华,宋现让,刘美芹,张锡芹,郑莉,李秀菊,刘蒲香.Ⅲ期Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌预后影响因素分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(6):345-348. 被引量:17
  • 2宋丽华,宋现让,张锡芹,齐洁琳,李秀菊,田禾,步兵.小细胞肺癌患者预后因素分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(7):413-416. 被引量:23
  • 3郑洪泽,曲翠娥.肿瘤标志物检测的临床应用原则[J].滨州医学院学报,2007,30(1):70-71. 被引量:7
  • 4Therasse P,Arbuck SG,Eisenhauer EA,et al.New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors.J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92:205-216.
  • 5Holdemieder S,von Pawel J,Dankelmann E,et al.Nucleosomes,ProGRP,NSE,CYFRA21-1,and CEA in monitoring first-line chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer.Clin Cancer Res,2008,14:7813-7821.
  • 6Pujol JL,Molinier O,Ebert W,et al.CYFRA21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer:results of a metaanalysis in 2063 patients.Br J Cancer,2004,90:2097-2105.
  • 7Ardizzoni A,Cafferata MA,Tiseo M,et al.Decline in serum carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 19 fragment during chemotherapy predicts objective response and survival in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer.Cancer,2006,107:2842-2849.
  • 8Mountain CF.Staging classification of lung cancer:a critical evaluation.Clin Chest Med,2002,23:103-121.
  • 9Nisman B,Biran H,Heching N,et al.Prognostic role of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer:association of marker changes after two chemotherapy cycles with different measures of clinical response and survival.Br J Cancer,2008,98:77-79.
  • 10Mede P,Janicot H,Filaire M,et al.Early CYFRA 21-1 variation predicts tumor response to chemotherapy and survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.Int J Biol Markers,2004,19:310-315.

共引文献35

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部