期刊文献+

严格审查修改说明是保证论文学术质量的重要环节 被引量:7

Carefully checking authors' response to reviewers' comments:a crucial measure to ensure the quality of sci-tech journals
原文传递
导出
摘要 修改说明是稿件退修过程中作者对审稿意见的回复,是作者行使知情权、参与权、表达权(申诉权、话语权)和监督权的体现;因此是编辑质量控制流程中不可忽视的一个环节。本文针对科技论文中作者对修改说明重视不够,存在敷衍搪塞、避而不答或答非所问的一些现象,提出了改进措施并阐述了编辑在质量控制中的意义和作用。 Authors' response to reviewers' comments is authors' answer to reviewer's suggestions, questions or criticisms, and is the reflection of authors' right to know, rights of participation, expression and supervision. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in the course of journal quality control. A lot of authors cannot attach enough importance to their response to reviewers' comments, often prevaricating, avoiding questions, or even giving irrelevant answers. In this paper, some measures are proposed targeting these phenomena, and editor's role in is also diseussesed controlling the oualitv of sei-teeh Journals.
作者 王蕾
出处 《编辑学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期37-39,共3页 Acta Editologica
关键词 科技期刊 稿件退改 修改说明 质量控制 严格审查 sci-tech journal manuscript revision authors'response to reviewers' comments quality control strict checking
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献52

共引文献79

同被引文献60

引证文献7

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部