摘要
修改说明是稿件退修过程中作者对审稿意见的回复,是作者行使知情权、参与权、表达权(申诉权、话语权)和监督权的体现;因此是编辑质量控制流程中不可忽视的一个环节。本文针对科技论文中作者对修改说明重视不够,存在敷衍搪塞、避而不答或答非所问的一些现象,提出了改进措施并阐述了编辑在质量控制中的意义和作用。
Authors' response to reviewers' comments is authors' answer to reviewer's suggestions, questions or criticisms, and is the reflection of authors' right to know, rights of participation, expression and supervision. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in the course of journal quality control. A lot of authors cannot attach enough importance to their response to reviewers' comments, often prevaricating, avoiding questions, or even giving irrelevant answers. In this paper, some measures are proposed targeting these phenomena, and editor's role in is also diseussesed controlling the oualitv of sei-teeh Journals.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期37-39,共3页
Acta Editologica
关键词
科技期刊
稿件退改
修改说明
质量控制
严格审查
sci-tech journal
manuscript revision
authors'response to reviewers' comments
quality control
strict checking