期刊文献+

飞秒LASIK与SBK术后角膜像差的对比分析 被引量:7

Comparison of corneal aberrations after femtosecond laser LASIK and SBK
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较飞秒激光FS200制瓣辅助的LASIK(FS-LASIK)和角膜板层刀制瓣的前弹力层下激光角膜磨镶术(SBK)的临床效果及角膜像差变化.方法 前瞻性病例对照研究.34例(68眼)应用FS200飞秒激光制瓣(FS组)患者和45例(90眼)M2微型角膜板层刀制瓣(SBK组)患者纳入研究.术前及术后1、3个月分别检查记录2组患者的裸眼视力、屈光度、矫正视力,并采用Pentacam-HR眼前节分析系统,对术眼进行眼前节扫描获得三维图像,通过内置分析软件获取瞳孔直径为6 mm的角膜总高阶像差(HOA)、球差(C40)、水平彗差(C31)、垂直彗差(C3-1)和水平三叶草(C33)、斜向三叶草(C3-3)数据,采用方差分析及t检验进行统计分析.结果 FS组角膜HOA、C40、C3-1手术前后比较差异均有统计学意义(F=8.511、12.356、11.843,P<0.01);SBK组角膜HOA、C40、C3-1、C31差异也存在统计学意义(F=46.601、38.627、10.874、11.727,P<0.01).术后1个月时SBK组HOA的增高幅度明显高于FS组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.063,P<0.05),术后3个月仍有同样趋势(t=2.998,P<0.05).术后1个月时2组患者角膜球差均有增高,组间差异无统计学意义(t=-1.990,P>0.05),而3个月时FS组有所恢复,组间差异有统计学意义(t=-2.666,P<0.05).2组三叶草像差(C33、C33)均较术前增加,术后1、3个月斜向三叶草(C3-3)与术前比较差异有统计学意义,但组间比较差异无统计学意义.结论 FS-LASIK和SBK均可造成角膜总高阶像差、球差、垂直彗差的增加,但FS-LASIK角膜总高阶像差和球差的增幅比SBK小,在提高视觉质量方面飞秒可发挥更大的作用. Objective To compare changes in wavefront aberrations on the cornea after femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) and sub-Bowman's keratomileusis (SBK),especially for total higher order aberrations (HOA),corneal spherical aberrations (C40),corneal horizontal coma (C31),corneal vertical coma (C3-1),corneal horizontal trefoil (C33) and corneal oblique trefoil (C3-3).Methods A prospective study was designed for 2 groups based on the procedure used.The groups were composed of 68 eyes of 34 patients who had undergone FS-LASIK and 90 eyes of 45 patients who had been treated with SBK.A Pentacam was used under dark room conditions to measure corneal aberrations before surgery and 1 and 3 months after surgery.Data were analyzed using ANOVA,an independent samples t test and Pearson correlation.Results The preoperative and postoperative differences for the total corneal HOA,corneal C40,and corneal C31in the FS-LASIK group were significant (F=8.511,12.356,11.843,P〈0.01).The corresponding differences and in addition corneal C31 were also significant for the SBK group (F=46.601,38.627,10.874,11.727,P〈0.01).One month after surgery,HOAs were higher in the SBK group than in the FS group (t=-3.063,P〈0.05),and the same tendency was found 3 months after surgery (t=2.998,P〈0.05).The differences for C40 at 1 month were not significant between the two groups (t=-1.990,P〉0.05) but the differences were statistically significant at 3 months (t=-2.666,P〈0.05).One and 3 months after surgery,the trefoil aberrations (C33,C3-3) of the cornea in the two groups were higher than before surgery; only the difference for C3-3 was significant.However,the difference in the trefoil aberrations of the cornea between the two groups was not statistically significant.Conclusion Both FS-LASIK and SBK can increase corneal HOA,corneal spherical aberrations and vertical coma,but the degree of increase after FS-LASIK is smaller than that after SBK.FS-LASIK improves visual quality more than SBK.
机构地区 上海瑞视眼科
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期20-24,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
关键词 波前像差 角膜磨镶术 激光原位 飞秒激光 角膜磨镶术 前弹力层下 机械角膜刀 Wavefront aberration Keratomileusis,laser in situ Femtosecond laser Keratomileusis,sub-Bowman&#39 s Microkeratome
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1GIL-CAZORLAR,TEUS MA,DE BENITO-LLOPIS L.Incidence of diffuse lamellar keratitis after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with the IntraLase15kHz femtosecond laser and Moria M2microke-ratome. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery . 2008
  • 2Lubatschowski H.Overview of commercially available femtosecond lasers in refractive surgery. Journal of Refractive Surgery . 2008
  • 3Soong HK,Malta JB.Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology. American Journal of Ophthalmology . 2009
  • 4Chen S,Feng Y,Stojanovic A,et al.IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia;a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Refractive Surgery . 2012
  • 5Wedeiros FW,Stapleton WM,Hammel J,Krueger RR,Netto MV,Wil-son SE.Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with thefemtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. Journal of Refractive Surgery . 2007
  • 6Salom o MQ,Ambrsio R,Jr,Wilson SE.Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis:Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery . 2009
  • 7Netto MV,Mohan RR,Medeiros FW, et al.Femtosecond laser and micro-keratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. Journal of Refractive Surgery . 2007
  • 8Krueger RR,Thornton IL,Xu M,et al.Rainbow glare as an optical side effect of IntraLASIK. Ophthalmology . 2008
  • 9Kezirian GM,Stonecipher KG.Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery . 2004
  • 10Durrie S,Kezirian GM.Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery . 2005

共引文献7

同被引文献76

  • 1Jing Zhang,Shi-Sheng Zhang,Qing Yu,Jiang-Xiu Wu,Jing-Cai Lian.Comparison of corneal flap thickness using a FS200femtosecond laser and a moria SBK microkeratome[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition),2014,7(2):273-277. 被引量:5
  • 2沈政伟,周和政,尹禾,吴金桃,李丽.Q值引导个体化LASIK治疗近视临床疗效评价[J].国际眼科杂志,2005,5(6):1194-1197. 被引量:27
  • 3郭玉峰,赵少贞.Pentacam眼前节测量及分析系统的临床应用进展[J].国际眼科纵览,2006,30(1):10-14. 被引量:35
  • 4LeeK,AhnJM,Kim EK,Kim TI.Comparisonofopticalqualityparametersandocularaberrationsafterwavefrontguidedlaserinsitukeratomileusisversuswavefrontguidedlaserepithelialkeratomileusisformyopia[J].GraefesArchClinExpOphthalmol,2013,251(9):2163-2169.
  • 5PadmanabhanP,BasuthkarSS,JosephR.OcularaberrationsafterwavefrontoptimizedLASIKformyopia[J].IndianJOphthalmol,2010,58(4):307-312.
  • 6BenitoA,RedondoM,ArtalP.Temporalevolutionofocularaberrationsfollowinglaserinsitukeratomileusis[J].OphthalmicPhysiolOpt,2011,31(4):42.1-428.
  • 7WangY,ZhaoK,JinY,NiuY,ZuoT.Changesofhigherorderaberrationwithvariouspupilsizesinthemyopiceye[J].JRefractSurg,2003,19(2):S270-274.
  • 8YangX,WangY,ZhaoK,FangL.ComparisonofhigherorderaberrationandopticalqualityafterEpiLASIK andLASIK formyopia[J].GraefesArchClinExpOphthalmol,2011,249(2): 28.1-288.
  • 9WangY,ZhaoKX,HeJC,JinY,ZuoT.Ocularhigherorderaberrationsfeaturesanalysisaftercornealrefractivesurgery[J].ChinMedJ(Engl),2007,120(4):269-273.
  • 10IvarsenA,HjortdalJ.SevenyearchangesincornealpowerandaberrationsafterPRKorLASIK[J].InvestOphthalmolVisSci, 2012,53(10):601.1-6016.

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部