期刊文献+

MS-222对大鲵麻醉效果的初步观察 被引量:7

Effectiveness of MS-222 as anesthetic agents for Andrias davidianus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 观测MS-222对大鲵( Andrias davidianus)的麻醉效果。12~15℃水温下,使用0.6 g/L MS-222对16尾4.7龄宁陕县东河的大鲵和16尾2.7龄周至县黑河的大鲵进行浸浴麻醉,每间隔5 min,观测个体的逃匿反应、翻正反射及痛感反应,记录个体麻醉时间和恢复时间并进行数据分析。使用0.6 g/L MS-222对大鲵进行浸浴处理,32尾个体均达到深度麻醉,所需时间为11~30 min,苏醒时间为30~180 min;体重与麻醉时间呈显著的正相关关系( r=0.320),水温与麻醉时间呈显著的强负相关关系( r=-0.698)。试验过程中没有个体死亡。 This study represents the first attempt to evaluate the effectiveness of MS-222 as anesthetic agents for Andrias davidianus.Two groups of A.davidianus, sixteen from Heihe river basin and sixteen from Donghe river basin , were anes-thetized in a 12 ℃ water bath containing MS-222 ( 600 mg/L of water ) . After a one half month period , eight of the A.davidianus were randomly chosen for anesthesia in a 15℃water bath.Escape, right, superficial pain, and deep pain reflexes were monitored at every five-minute intervals after exposure to anesthetics .The duration of deep anesthesia and of recovery was recorded .MS-222 administered at 0.6 g/L produced deep anesthesia in all of the A.davidianus either in 12 ℃water bath or in 15 ℃ water bath.The time for anesthesia and recovery ranged between 11 ~30 min and 30 ~180 min, respectively .The higher water temperature significantly ( P<0.01 ) reduced the time required for deep anesthe-sia and for recovery at both groups .A slightly positive correlation ( r=0.320 ) was found between body mass and the time for anesthesia and recovery .
出处 《淡水渔业》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期94-97,共4页 Freshwater Fisheries
基金 陕西省科学院重大研究项目"秦岭关键濒危动物致濒机理及其种群扩繁技术的研究"(2012K-01) 国际合作项目"大鲵人工放流与监测"(DGH2010-01)
关键词 大鲵( ANDRIAS davidianus) 麻醉 MS-222 浸浴 MS-222 Andrias davidianus anesthesia water bath
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Wright K M, Whitaker B R. Amphibian Medicine and Captive Husbandry[ M ]. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing, 2000 : 114-120.
  • 2Downes H. Tricaine anesthesia in Amphibia: a review [ J ]. Bull Assoc Rep Amphib Vet, 1995, 5(2) : 11-16.
  • 3Letcher J L. Intracoelomic use of trieaine methanesulfonate for an- esthesia of bullfrogs ( Rana catesbeiana) and leopard frogs ( Rana pipiens) [J]. Zoo Biol, 1992, 11 : 243-251.
  • 4Lowe J. Rates of tricaine methanesulfonate ( MS-222 ) anesthetiza- tion in relation to pH and concentration in five terrestrial salaman- ders[J]. Herpetol Rev, 2004, 35: 352-354.
  • 5Crook A C, Whiteman H H. An evaluation of MS-222 and benzo- eaine for metamorphic and paedomorphic tiger salamanders (Ambys- toma tigrinum nebulosum)[J]. Am Midl Natural, 2006, 155 (2) : 417-422.
  • 6Mitchell M A. Anesthetic consideration for amphibians [ J ]. J Ex- otic Pet Medic, 2009 : 40-49.
  • 7Lafortune M, Mitchell M A, Smith J. Evaluation of medetomi- dine, clove oil, and propofol for anesthesia of leopard frogs, Rana pipiens[J]. J Herpetol Medic Surgery, 2001, 11(4) : 13-18.
  • 8Mitchell M A, Riggs S, Singleton B, et al. Evaluating the clini- cal and cardiopulmonary effects of clove oil and propofol in tiger sal- amanders (Ambystoma tigrinum) [ J]. J Exotic Pet Medic, 2009, 18: 50-56.
  • 9唐以杰,曾小龙,方昆阳.中国大鲵皮肤的组织学观察[J].广东科技,1999,8(7):26-27. 被引量:15
  • 10Stuart S N, Chanson J S, Cox N A, et al. A comparison of the effectiveness of recommended doses of MS-222 ( tricaine methane- sulfonate) and Orajel (benzocaine) for amphibian anesthesia [Jl. Herpetological, 2007, 38(1): 63-66.

共引文献14

同被引文献68

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部