期刊文献+

我国高新技术上市公司绩效评价体系研究 被引量:5

Research on the Performance Evaluation of Chinese High-tech Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于高新技术上市公司知识资本和智力资本含量较高,传统企业绩效评价模式无法对其业绩进行科学评价,因此有必要建立专门的绩效评价指标体系,以突出其高成长性、高风险性的特点和满足各种利益相关者的特殊要求。运用平衡计分卡的基本思想,侧重知识资本和智力资本的考核,对原有指标体系进行扩展,尝试设计可以满足高新技术上市公司绩效评价特殊要求的指标体系。 Because knowledge capital and intellectual capital content is higher in high-tech listed compa-nies,traditional enterprise performance evaluation models are not able to evaluate the performance of high-tech listed companies rationally.Therefore,establishment of a special performance evaluation in-dex system for high-tech listed companies is necessary to character the high growth and high risk and to meet stakeholders'requirements.Currently,generally accepted performance evaluation system is missed,focusing on the knowledge capital and intellectual capital evaluation,this paper uses the basic idea of the balanced score card and expands the original index system to try to design an index system that can meet the special requirement of high-tech listed companies.
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期42-47,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 教育部人文科学规划基金项目(08JA630061) 国家软科学研究计划(2013GXS4D133)
关键词 高新技术上市公司 平衡计分卡拓展 绩效评价 high-tech listed companies balanced score card development performance evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

共引文献76

同被引文献50

  • 1于成刚,梅姝娥.科技项目后评价方法及指标体系研究[J].科技经济市场,2008(6):84-85. 被引量:8
  • 2安鸿章,葛峻峰.全方位解析平衡计分卡[J].中国人力资源开发,2004,21(9):48-52. 被引量:13
  • 3韩兆洲,谢铭杰.上市公司投资价值评价模型及其实证分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2004(11):71-75. 被引量:46
  • 4傅毓维,尹航,杨贵彬.基于混合DEA模型的高新技术企业经营业绩评价研究[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(8):49-53. 被引量:10
  • 5周虹 许飞月.自然科学基金申请项目综合评审方法.广东科技,1997,(4):1-3.
  • 6Charles I.Jones,John C.Williams.Measuring the Social Return To R&D[J].The Quarterly Journal of Econom- ics, 1998,113(4) : 1119-1135.
  • 7Cohen W. M., D. Levinthal. Innovation and Learning: the two Faces of R&D[J].Economic Journal, 1989,99 (397) :569-596.
  • 8Busom I. An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of RInD Subsidies[J].Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2000,9 (2) : 111 -148.
  • 9Hussinger.K.R&D and Subsidies at the Firm Level: An Application of Parametric and Semi-parametric Two- step Selection Models[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2008, (6) :729-747.
  • 10Wallsten. S. The Effects of Government-industry RgaD Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program[J].Journal of Economics, 2000, (31):82-100.

引证文献5

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部