期刊文献+

企业价值决策的伦理基础探赜 被引量:2

Exploration in the Ethical Basis of Corporate Decision-Based Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业价值决策是指企业的经营活动要在多方利益主体的价值冲突中做出正确的抉择,它是一个涵盖多领域、多方面利益、多学科视角的复杂过程,企业价值决策的伦理基础自然成为制约企业社会责任理论发展的核心难题。义务论、功利主义和美德伦理为企业价值决策提供了一般的伦理原则。但是,这三种伦理理论都无法单独解决企业与复杂的社会环境之间的互动所产生的价值冲突问题,难以给出企业价值决策的合理方案。实用主义道德哲学从走向现实的道德生活、面向开放的道德过程、采用切实可行的道德方法三大方面,更适用处于复杂多变境遇下的企业价值决策。基于实用主义道德哲学的企业价值决策过程包括价值沟通、观点辩论和方案抉择三个阶段,它们构成了企业价值决策的完成过程,为企业管理者指出了价值决策的具体方法和途径。 Corporate decision-based value means making a right choice among the stakeholder ’s value conflicts w hich is complex process involving problems ,stakes and subjects of many aspects .Naturally ,the ethical basis of decision-based value is the key problem w hich hinders the development of corporate social responsibility the-ory .Deontology ,utilitarianism and virtue theory provide the general ethical principles for decision-based value . However ,the three theories cannot resolve the value conflicts led by the interaction between corporate and the complex social environment respectively .The moral life ,process and methods-oriented moral philosophy of pragmatism seems to be more suitable for the complex and changeable situation w here the decision-based value is made .The process based on the moral philosophy of pragmatism involves three phases :value communica-tion ,argument for points and final decision making ,w hich is a continuation and provides a specific approach to the corporate decision-based value for managers .
出处 《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第1期48-51,共4页 Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金项目:"基于意义建构理论的企业社会责任知识传播研究"(71202105)
关键词 价值决策 实用主义 企业社会责任 decision-based value pragmatism corporate social responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1CARR()LL A B. Social issues in management research[J]. Business and Society,1994,33(1) :5-29.
  • 2BUCHHOLZ R A,ROSENTHAL S B. Business Ethics: The Pragmatic Path Beyond Principles to Process [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR, 1998.
  • 3彭国华.商谈伦理学的价值与现实际遇[N].人民日报,2009-06-30(07).
  • 4THIEL C E, JOHNSON J F, BAGDASAROV Z, et al. Leader ethical decision making in organizations: strategies for sensemaking[J]. Journal of Business Ethics,2012,107 : 49-64.
  • 5杜威.哲学的改造[M].许崇清,译.北京:商务印书馆,2002:1.
  • 6高来源.论反思性道德的实践向度--对杜威道德哲学的实践性解读[J].道德与文明,2012(2):63-68. 被引量:2
  • 7江怡.实用主义如何作为一种方法[N].中国丰十会科学报.2013-01-14(A5).
  • 8赵小丽,王飞.环境价值观的普遍性追求——论毕恩巴赫环境伦理思想[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2012,33(4):65-69. 被引量:3
  • 9Van BUREN H J. If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2001,11 (3) : 481-499.
  • 10SWANSON D L. Toward an integrative theory of busi ness and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1999,24(3) :506-521.

二级参考文献10

共引文献13

同被引文献54

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部