期刊文献+

Tinetti平衡与步态量表用于老年人跌倒风险评估的信效度研究 被引量:41

The reliability and validity of the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment-Chinese version in assessment of the falling risk of elderly people
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨Tinetti平衡与步态量表(Tinetti POMA)在老年人跌倒风险评估中应用的信效度.方法 对成都市2所老年院中的200名老年人采用Tinetti POMA进行评估,对其信度效度进行分析.结果 总量表内部一致性Cronbach α系数为0.887,分量表为0.872、0.718;总量表的Guttman分半信度系数为0.883,分量表为0.808、0.626;总量表的重测信度组内相关系数(ICC)为0.886,分量表为0.877、856;因子分析共提取了2个公因子,方差贡献率为54.65%,各条目的因子负荷值为0.501~0.822;跌倒组得分低于无跌倒组,差异有统计学意义.结论 Tinetti POMA具有良好的信度及效度,可以作为我国老年人跌倒风险评估的工具进行推广应用. Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Tinetti POMA-Chinese version.Methods 200 elderly people in two nursing homes of Chengdu were assessed with Tinetti POMA,the reliability and validity of DGI were evaluated.Results The Cronbach's alpha of total scale was 0.887,the subscales' Cronbach's alpha were 0.872,0.718,the Guttman split-half coefficient of total scale was 0.883,the sub-scales' Guttman split-half coefficient were 0.808,0.626,the test-retest reliability of total scale was 0.886.the sub-scales' were 0.877,0.856; the factor analysis indicated the Tinetti POMA was composed of 2 factors,which could explain 54.65% of total variance; the factor loading value from 0.501 to 0.822; the score of fall group were lower than those without fall,the difference was statistically significant.Conclusions The Chinese version of Tinetti POMA has good reliability and validity,it can be used as a valid tool for the assessment of elderly people's falling risk.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第5期61-63,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 成都中医药大学校基金资助项目(ZRMS201257)
关键词 跌倒 平衡与步态量表 信度 效度 Fall Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献144

共引文献524

同被引文献482

引证文献41

二级引证文献365

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部