期刊文献+

消费者的解释水平对其选择偏好的影响 被引量:3

Effect of Consumer's Construal Level on the Choice Preference
下载PDF
导出
摘要 解释水平理论已广泛应用于消费者行为等领域。人们倾向于用低水平的、具体的和背景化的特点去表征近距离的事物,用高水平的、抽象的和一般化的特点去表征远距离的事物。解释水平理论起源于时间解释理论,随后扩展到空间距离、社会距离和概率等。本文从中心特征与外周特征、愿望性与可行性、正面理由与反面理由、理想价值与现实考量、可比与不可比属性五个方面阐述了解释水平对消费选择偏好的影响,并提出了新的研究方向。 Construal level theory (CLT) has been widely used in some fields including consumer behavior. People would like to construe objects or events that are psychologically near in terms of low-level, de- tailed, and contextualized features, whereas they construe the same objects or events in terms of high-lev- el, abstract, and stable features. CLT is originated from temporal construal and extends to space distance, spatial distance and probability. We will describe the effect of consumer's construal level on the choice preference on central vs. peripheral features, feasibility vs. desirability, pros vs. cons. idealistic values vs. pragmatic concerns, and alignable versus nonalignable attributes. Finally, we put forward new directions.
出处 《心理研究》 2014年第1期15-22,共8页 Psychological Research
基金 2013年上海市浦江人才计划和2011年上海市哲学社会科学规划课题"理想和现实自我差异的启动对消费时间偏好的影响"
关键词 消费者行为 解释水平 心理距离 consumer behavior construal level psychological distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

二级参考文献147

  • 1黄希庭.未来时间的心理结构[J].心理学报,1994,26(2):121-127. 被引量:65
  • 2Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal. Psychological Science, 19(2), 161-167.
  • 3Armor, D. A., & Sackett, A. M. (2006). Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 583-600.
  • 4Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622.
  • 5Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 610-622.
  • 6Bilgin, B., & Brenner, L. (2008). Temporal distance moderates description dependence of subjective probability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(3), 890-895.
  • 7Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2004). Temporal distance, event representation, and similarity. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
  • 8Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2006). Representation across time: Generalizing temporal effects on perceived similarity. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada.
  • 9Day, S. B., & Barrels, D. M. (2008). Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity. Cognition, 106, 1504-1513.
  • 10Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees:Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.

共引文献223

同被引文献33

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部