期刊文献+

基于景观生态的山区风电开发区域生态风险评价 被引量:4

The assessment of regional ecological risks of wind energy exploitation in the mountain area based on landscape ecology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 评价山区风电开发的区域生态风险。以景观生态学为切入点,考虑不同类型景观对生态环境的作用及其抗干扰能力,风电开发活动对区域景观的隔离效应,结合山地地表、地质环境和区域景观组分,及山区风电开发活动特征,提出利用景观风险势、隔离效应和生态敏感系数3个指数,构建山地型风电开发生态风险模型。风电开发后,73.44%区域以中级以下风险为主;不足5%的区域为高风险区和极高风险区,主要分布于W1机位东北部和W14-W22段南部;风电开发使研究区生态风险升高,风险变化趋势呈明显的山脊导向特征;高风险影响范围虽有限,但对临近的人类活动易达区域影响较大。 To assess regional ecological risk of wind energy exploitation in the mountain area. Taking the land- scape ecology as a point, considering the function and the anti-interference ability of different types of land- scape in the ecological environment, isolation effect of wind energy exploitation on the regional landscape, meanwhile, combining with mountain surface, geological environment, regional landscape component, and the characteristic of wind energy exploitation, three indexes of landscape risk potential, isolation effect, ecological sensitive coefficient were put forward to design the evaluation model of regional ecological risks of wind energy exploitation in the mountain district. If the design was put into practice, 73.44% of the area will be interme- diate risk and below area; less than 5 % of the area will be high risk area or extremely high risk area, which is in the northeast of W1 and the south of W14-W22 section. Wind energy exploitation will increase regional ecological risk, and the risk change trend will appear obvious ridge orientation features; although the sphere of high risk influence is limited, the neighboring human activities esselte regions will be greatly effected.
作者 刘哲 马俊杰
出处 《西北大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期128-132,共5页 Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基金 陕西省教育厅科研基金资助项目(06JK181)
关键词 风电开发 山区 景观 生态风险 wind energy exploitation mountain area landscape ecological risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

二级参考文献311

共引文献787

同被引文献60

  • 1马克平,黄建辉,于顺利,陈灵芝.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅱ丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J].生态学报,1995,15(3):268-277. 被引量:1224
  • 2贡璐,鞠强,潘晓玲.博斯腾湖区域景观生态风险评价研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(1):27-31. 被引量:44
  • 3阳文锐,王如松,黄锦楼,李锋,陈展.生态风险评价及研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(8):1869-1876. 被引量:118
  • 4Anselin L, Syabri I, Kho Y. 2010. GeoDa: An introduction to spatial data analysis. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis, 38: 5-22.
  • 5Fleury AM, Brown RD. 1997. A framework for the design of wildlife conservation corridors with specific application to southwestern Ontario. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37: 163-186.
  • 6Gaines KF, Porter DE, Dyer SA, et al. 2004. Using wildlife as receptor species: A landscape approach to ecological risk assessment. Environmental Management, 34: 528-545.
  • 7Kiester AR. 1996. Conservation prioritization using GAP date. Conservation Biology, 10 : 1332-1342.
  • 8Knaapen JP, Scheffer M, Harms B. 1992. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Plan ning, 23: 1-16.
  • 9Liu DD, Qu ILl, Zhao CH. 2012. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Yellow River Delta. Journal of Food Agricul tural & Environment, 10: 970-972.
  • 10Malekmohammadi B, Rahimi Blouchi L. 2014. Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using multi criteria deci sion making and geographic information system. Ecological Indicators, 41: 133-144.

引证文献4

二级引证文献151

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部