期刊文献+

中国改革深水区的法律试验新难题和基本思路——以中国(上海)自由贸易试验区的制度体系构建为主线 被引量:17

The New Challenges and Basic Ideas of the Legal Test of China's Reform in the Deepwater Area——Take the System Construction of the Free-trade Zone of China(Shanghai) as the Main Line
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上海自贸区的法制环境建设是改革试验不可或缺的核心组成部分。但是,已步入改革深水区的此次制度创新的力度和尺度之大、难度之高,使得相应的这场法律试验面临极大的挑战。它在立法框架上的基本立场,是转向和接轨于国际标准规则的新多边主义;在执法体制上,期望通过简政放权而取得新政治体制的突破;在救济体系上,虽然相应司法机构的安排只能是"框架内的微调",但其拥有更多的法之外权衡空间,以及一系列多元性的处置原则和通道。在此基础上,真正实现从"法律试验"到"制度转型"的进化,且不能忽视制度构建的微观视角,要充分考量改革后执法监管体制的可复制,以及法外之地的专业多元解纷机制。 The legal environment construction of Shanghai free-trade zone is the indispensable core components of the pilot reform. However, this legal test is faced with great challenges due to both the big scale and great difficul- ty of this system innovation which is in the deep degree. It tries to bring the institutional innovation and reform to a higher level, broader ranges and more comprehensive directions. In the legislative, its basic position is to conform to the new muhilateralism of the international standard rules; In the law enforcement system, its expectation is to a- chieve new breakthrough by means of decentralization of political system; In the remedy system, it has much bigger extrajudicial space and a series of multiple principles and channels although the judicial institution arrangement can only be the fine-tuning in the framework. On this basis, in order to truly realize the evolution from the legal test to system transformation, we can not ignore the perspective of system construction, and should fully consider the replica- bility of the law enforcement supervision system after the reform, as Well as the extrajudicial multivariate dispute reso- lution mechanism.
作者 杨力
出处 《政法论丛》 CSSCI 2014年第1期3-14,共12页 Journal of Political Science and Law
基金 上海交通大学文理交叉专项基金项目(134JCY04)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 上海自贸区 法律试验 国际惯例 简政放权 救济体系 Shanghai free-trade zone legal test international practice decentralization of political system the remedy system
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献14

  • 1江国华.宪法哲学导论[J].东南学术,2004(3):110-121. 被引量:6
  • 2(美)汉密尔顿(AlexanderHamilton)等著,程逢如等.联邦党人文集[M]商务印书馆,1980.
  • 3(美)罗斯科·庞德(RoscoePound)著,唐前宏等.普通法的精神[M]法律出版社,2001.
  • 4(英)戴雪(AlbertVennDicey)著,雷宾南.英宪精义[M]中国法制出版社,2001.
  • 5(英)佩里·安德森(PerryAnderson),(英)帕屈克·卡米勒(PatrickCamiller)主编,张亮,吴勇立.西方左派图绘[M]江苏人民出版社,2002.
  • 6马克〓.中西封建社会比较研究[M]学林出版社,1997.
  • 7R.Hazell,D.Sinclair.The British Constitution in1997—98:Labour‘s Constitutional RevolutionParliamentary Affairs,1999.
  • 8House ofLords Act 1999.
  • 9McGonnell v.U.KEurCtHR/,2000.
  • 10Diana Woodhouse.United Kingdom:the Constitutional Reform Act2005——Defending Judicial Independence the English WayInternational Journal of Constitutional Law,2007.

共引文献33

同被引文献277

引证文献17

二级引证文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部