期刊文献+

糖尿病足感染患者的病原菌分布及药敏分析 被引量:4

Distribution and drug susceptibility of pathogens causing diabetic foot infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究糖尿病足溃疡感染病原菌分布,并对其临床耐药性进行相关分析,为临床预防治疗提供参考依据。方法对2011年5月-2013年5月在医院就诊的178例糖尿病足溃疡感染患者的溃疡物或脓性分泌物,进行病原菌培养及药敏分析,病原菌培养严格按照临床操作流程逐步进行,药敏试验采用纸片扩散法进行,采用SPSS 13.0统计软件对数据进行处理。结果 178例患者共分离出病原菌214株,其中革兰阴性菌124株占57.9%,革兰阳性菌65株占30.4%,真菌25株占11.7%;病原菌排名前5位的分别为大肠埃希菌、普通变形菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、类肠球菌、肺炎克雷伯菌,分别占15.4%、9.8%、8.9%、8.4%、6.1%;革兰阴性菌对哌拉西林、阿米卡星以及头孢拉定较为敏感,敏感率>75.0%;革兰阳性菌对万古霉素以及庆大霉素较为敏感,敏感率>85.0%;真菌对氟康唑以及伏立康唑较为敏感,敏感率>81.5%。结论在临床治疗过程中,可以根据药敏试验结果及时调整抗菌药物,以促进溃疡早期愈合。 OBJECTIVE To study the distribution of pathogenic bacteria causing diabetic foot ulcers and analyze the drug resistance so as to provide guidance for the clinical prevention and treatment. METHODS A total of 178 cases of diabetic foot ulcers, who were treated in the hospital from May 2011 to May 2013, were enrolled in the study, then the ulcers or purulent secretions were collected for culture of pathogens, the drug susceptibility testing was performed with the use of disk diffusion method, the culture of pathogens was conducted by strictly according to the clinical operation procedures, and the statistical analysis was performed with the use of SPSS13.0 software. RESULTS Totally 214 strains of pathogens have been isolated from the 178 patients, including 124 (57. 9~) strains of gram-negative bacteria, 65 (30.4 ~) strains of gram-positive bacteria, and 25 (11.7 ~/00 ) strains of fungi; the Escherichia coli, Proteus vulgaris, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ranked the top five species of pathogens, accounting for 15.4~, 9.8~, 8.9~, 8.4%, and 6.1~, respectively. The gram-negative bacteria were highly susceptible to piperacillin, amikacin, and cefradine, with the drug susceptibility rate more than 75. 0~; the gram-positive bacteria were highly susceptible to vancomycin and gentamicin, with the drug susceptibility rate more than 85.0% ; the fungi were highly susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole, with the drug susceptibility rate more than 81.5 ~. CONCLUSION The use of antibiotics should be adjusted in a timely manner according to the result of drug susceptibility testing during the clinical treatment so as to promote the early healing of ulcers.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期831-832,837,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 浙江省湖州市科技计划基金资助项目(2010YZ14)
关键词 糖尿病足 感染 病原菌 敏感性 Diabetic foot ulcer Infection Pathogen Drug susceptibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1李永恒,何利平,王椿,刘关键,陈大伟,陈利鸿,冉兴无.糖尿病足合并感染患者532株病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2011,3(4):296-300. 被引量:29
  • 2Aragón-Sánchez J,Lázaro-Martínez JL,Hernández-Herrero MJ. Clinical significance of the isolation of Staphylococcus epidermidis from bone biopsy in diabeticfoot osteomyelitis[J].Diabet Foot Ankle,2010,(1).
  • 3Buchberger B,Follmann M,Freyer D. The importance of growth factors for the treatment of chronic wounds in the case of diabeticfoot ulcers[J].GMS Health Technol Assess,2010.Doc12.
  • 4Tiwari S,Pratyush DD,Gupta B. Prevalence and severity of vitamin D deficiency in patients with diabetic foot infection[J].{H}British Journal of Nutrition,2013,(1):99-102.
  • 5Ramakant P,Verma AK,Misra R. Changing microbiological profile of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infections:time for arethink on which empirical therapy to choose[J].{H}DIABETOLOGIA,2011,(1):58-64.

共引文献28

同被引文献43

  • 1Lipsky BA ,Arag6n-Snchez J, Diggle M,et al. IWGDF Guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in pecans with diabetes[J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 2016,32 Suppl 1:45-74. DOI : 10. 1002/dmrr. 2699.
  • 2Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery IG II, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2004,39 (7) : 885-910.
  • 3Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections[ J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2012,54 ( 12 ) :e132-e173. DOI : 10. 1093/cid/cis346.
  • 4Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Murdoch DP, et al. Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's diabeticfoot infection classification system [ J ]. Clin Infect Dis, 2007, 44 (4) : 562- 565.
  • 5Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, et al. Risk factors for foot infection in individuals with diabetes [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2006, 29(6) : 1288-1293.
  • 6Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, et al. High prevalence ot' ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients withdiabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results fi'om the Eurodiale study[ J ]. Diabetologia,2007, 50 ( 1 ) : 18-25.
  • 7Dinh MT, Abad CL, Safdar N. Diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination and imaging tests for osteomyelitisunderlying diabetic foot ulcers: meta-analysis[ J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2008, 47 (4) : 519-527. DOI: 10. 1086/590011.
  • 8Peters EJ, Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions in the management of infection in the diabetic foot[ J]. Diabetes Metab Res Rev,2012,28 Snppl 1 : 142-162. DOI: 10. lO02/dmrr. 2247.
  • 9Teh J, Berendt T, Lipsky BA. Rational imaging. Investigating suspected bone infection in the diabetic foot [ J ]. BM, 2009, 339 : b4690. DOI : 10. 1136/bmj. 64690.
  • 10Fujii M,Armstrong DG,Terashi I-I. Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis in the presence of ischemia[ J ]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2013,52 ( 6 ) : 717-723. DOI : 10. 1053/j. jfas. 2013.07. 009.

引证文献4

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部