期刊文献+

“非物质劳动”与资本逻辑——意大利自治马克思主义对政治经济学批判传统的复归 被引量:3

“Immaterial Labor”and the Logic of Capital——Italian Autonomous Marxism's Return on the Criticism of the Traditional Political Economics
原文传递
导出
摘要 与20世纪以来西方马克思主义整体上的文化批判路向不同,意大利自治主义的马克思主义秉承了马克思政治经济学批判的传统,对《资本论》及手稿重新进行了政治学解读,以劳动与资本二元主体的对抗关系为枢轴,揭示了资本主义劳动组织方式所发生的结构性转变,即从"福特主义"到"后福特主义"劳动主体、形式和内容越来越具有"非物质劳动"的倾向,资本逻辑的深入剥削形式表现为对劳动者主体性的重新建构和社会生活的全面控制。奈格里、哈特等学者将"非物质劳动"置入马克思社会关系及再生产理论中,从福柯的"生命政治"框架中探寻建构革命主体的可能性,并对自主的、反抗的革命主体进行重新界定,坚持了马克思通过政治经济学批判向政治革命斗争实践转换的根本立场,在新时代语境下拓展了阶级斗争的主体向度和革命潜能。 Different from the Western Marxist cultural criticism as a whole since the twentieth Century, Italian Autonomous Marxism inherited the tradition of criticism from Marxist Political Economics. The Italian scholars reinterpreted Capital and its manuscripts from a political per- spective. Their theory stems from the opposition of the duality of capital and labor and reveals the structural change of capitalist labor organization, which is the increasing trend of "immaterial labor" within the subject, trend and contents of labor from "Fordism" to "post Fordism". A fur- ther exploitation of the logic of capital is expressed as the reconstruction of labor subjectivity and the complete control of social activities. Scholars such as Negri and Hart categorized immaterial labor into the theory of Marx's social relations and reproduction, searched for the possibility of constructing the revolution subject from Foucauh's "life politics" framework and redefined the in- dependent and rebellious revolution subject. Their work reinforce Marx's basic standpoint of transforming from criticism of political economics to the practice of political revolution, thereby broadening the horizon of subjectivity and revolutionary potentials of class wars.
作者 户晓坤
出处 《教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期84-90,共7页 Teaching and Research
基金 国家社科基金重大招标课题"改革开放视域下我国社会意识变动趋向与规律研究"(项目号:10zd&048) 中山大学青年培育项目"21世纪俄罗斯社会主义复兴运动研究"(项目号:1309067)的阶段性成果
关键词 自治主义的马克思主义 非物质劳动 资本逻辑 主体 Marxism of Autonomy immaterial labor logic of capital subject
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1肖恩·塞耶斯,周嘉昕(译).现代工业社会的劳动——围绕马克思劳动概念的考察[J].南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学),2007,44(1):33-41. 被引量:44
  • 2[法]德勒兹.《哲学与权力的谈判》,商务印书馆2000年版,第22页.
  • 3[美]哈特,[意]奈格里.《帝国:全球化的政治秩序》,江苏人民出版社2005年版第76页.
  • 4哈特,奈格里.《大众:帝国时代的战争与民主》(Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire ).
  • 5保罗·维尔诺.《大众的语法:对当代生命形式的分析》(A Grammar of the Multitude : For an Analysis of Contemporary Forms of Life ) .
  • 6Nick Dyer - Witheford, Cyber -Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High - Technology Capitalism, Urbana and Chicago.. University of Illinois Press, 1999,p. 65.
  • 7Sylvere Lotringer and Christian Marazzi, eds. , Autonomia : Post - Political Politics, New York: Semiotext, 1980, p. 29.
  • 8Antonio Negri, Revolution Retrieved: Selected Writings on Marx, Keynes, Capitalist Crisis and New Social Subjects 1967- 1983, London: Red Notes, 1988, p. 206.
  • 9Antonio Negri, Revolution Retrieved: Selected Writings on Marx, Keynes, Capitalist Crisis and New Social Subjects 1967- 1983, London: Red Notes, 1988, p. 228.
  • 10David Camfield, "The Multitude and the Kangaroo.. A Critique of Hardt and Negri's Theory of Immaterial Labour", Historical Materialism 15. 2(2007).

共引文献46

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部