期刊文献+

超微经皮肾镜取石术治疗31例肾结石的初步体会 被引量:121

Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones: a preliminary report of 31 cases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 报道一种命名为超微经皮肾镜取石术(super-mini-PCNL,SMP)的新技术,并探讨其治疗肾结石的临床效果、适应证及安全性. 方法 SMP技术利用外径为7F、工作通道为3.3F超细肾镜,通过10~12 F带吸引功能的peel-away鞘,采用钬激光或气压弹道碎石机击碎结石,并借助负压吸引器将碎石屑经带吸引功能的peel-away鞘吸到碎石收集瓶.2013年4-7月采用SMP技术治疗肾结石31例,其中儿童5例、体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)和/或软性输尿管镜治疗失败11例、孤立肾3例.结石位于下盏、中盏、上盏、肾盂、肾盂合并下盏、肾盂合并输尿管上段分别为12、2、1、7、6、3例.结石最大直径(1.9±0.6) cm. 结果 单通道28例,双通道3例.手术时间25~140 min,平均(54±30)min,术后血红蛋白下降(12.2±9.5) g/L.术后第1天结石清除率为94%(29/31),其中1例需二期SMP取石,1例上盏残留结石直径0.5 cm,需要ESWL辅助治疗;1个月总结石清除率达100%.2例(6%)出现术后发热,无需输血者.术后住院时间为(1.8±0.8)d.31例术后均未留置肾造瘘管,27例术后无须留置双J管,2例患者因需要同时处理同侧输尿管中段和下段结石留置输尿管外支架管24 h,2例因同时行同侧肾盂输尿管连接处狭窄内切开留置双J管8周. 结论 SMP治疗小于2 cm肾结石安全、有效,尤其适用于儿童肾结石、PCNL术后残留平行盏结石和ESWL及软镜治疗失败肾结石的治疗. Objective To describe our novel modified technique of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) and to report the safety,indication,and technique of this procedure for the treatment of kidney stones.Methods SMP was performed on 31 patients after proper consents were obtained.The procedure was done using a 7 F mini-nephroscope with 3.3 F working channel (Hawk,China) and a 10 or 12 F nephrostomy sheath that possessed suction-evacuation function.The sheath was connected to a specimen container then onto a negative pressure aspirator.Lithotripsy was performed using holmium:YAG laser and/or pneumatic lithotripter.Among our 31 patients,5 were children,11 were failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery,and 3 patients had solitary kidney.The stones in low pole,mid pole,upper pole,pelvic,pelvic-low pole,pelvic-upper ureter were 12,2,1,7,6,3 cases,respectively.The mean stone size was (1.9±0.6) cm.Results The average operative time was 54±30 (25-140) min.The mean hemoglobin drop was (12.2±9.5) g/L.Three cases require two nephrostomy tracts,and the remaining 28 required only single tract.The stone-free rate after 1 day was 94% (29/31).One patient required a second look SMP,and another one required auxiliary ESWL.The stone-free rate at 1 month was 100%.Fever occurred in 2 cases.No one needed blood transfusion.The mean postoperative hospital stay was (1.8±0.8) d.None of the patients had nephrostomy tube and 27 patients had neither double J stent nor Foley catheter placed.Two patients had both renal stone and ipsilateral ureteral stone treated simultaneously,and these 2 patients had ureteral catheter for 24 h.There were 2 patients underwent concurrent endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction and these 2 patients had indwelling ureteral stents for 8 weeks.Conclusions Our SMP with a suction-evacuation system is a safe and efficacious procedure for renal stones smaller than 2 cm.It might be particularly suitable for children,patients with lower pole stones,and residual stonse after previous surgical interventions.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期6-9,共4页 Chinese Journal of Urology
基金 广州市科技计划项目(民生科技重大专项)(201300000096)
关键词 肾结石 肾造口术 经皮 碎石术 超微经皮肾镜取石术 新技术 Kidney calculi Nephrostomy, percutaneous Lithotripsy Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy New technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Ghani KR,Sammon JD,Bhojani N. Trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy use and outcomes in the United States[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2013.558-564.
  • 2Poulakis V,Dahm P,Witzsch U. Prediction of lower pole stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy using an artificial neural network[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2003.1250-1256.
  • 3李新德,陈岳兵,许力为,吴海洋,余大敏,芮雪芳,张大宏,李恭会,丁国庆,马亮.影响体外冲击波碎石术疗效的因素分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(5):321-323. 被引量:53
  • 4Monga M,Best S,Venkatesh R. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes:a randomized,prospective study[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2006.137-141.
  • 5叶利洪,李雨林,李王坚,陈永良,陶水祥,蒋小强,娄纪祥.肾下盏解剖结构对输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石治疗肾下盏结石疗效的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2013,34(1):24-27. 被引量:103
  • 6Pearle MS,Lingeman JE,Leveillee R. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less[J].{H}Journal Of Urology,2008,(5):S69-S73.
  • 7Auge BK,Pietrow PK,Lallas CD. Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation[J].{H}JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY,2004.33-36.

二级参考文献16

  • 1曾国华,李逊,钟文,袁坚,单炽昌,吴开俊,陈文忠.微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾下盏结石[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):368-370. 被引量:45
  • 2梁丽莉,郭应禄,汤慧娣,石声华.ESWL 治疗输尿管结石失败原因分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(5):273-274. 被引量:200
  • 3Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, et al. Impact of power index,hydroureteronephrosis,stone size and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi. Urology,2001,58:16-22.
  • 4Jonathan M, Flalkov SPH, Bernard F,et al. Reassessing the efficacy of the Dornier MFL-5000 lithotriptor. J Urol,2000 ,164 :640-643.
  • 5Eterovic D, Juretic KL, Capkun V, et al. Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function. J Urol, 1999,161:39-44.
  • 6Grenabo L,Lindqvist K, Adami HO, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of renal stones. Treatment policy is as important for success as type of lithotriptor and patient selection. Arch Surg, 1997,132:20-26.
  • 7Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB, et al. The impact of pelvical- ieeal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology, 2012, 79: 61-66.
  • 8Irwin BH, Desai M. Ureteroscopic superiority to extraeorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of small-to-medium-sized intrarenal non-staghorn calculi. Urology, 2009, 74: 256-258.
  • 9Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexi- ble ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol, 2012, 19: 254-267.
  • 10Stay K, Cooper A, Zisman A, et al. Retrograde intrarenal litho- tripsy outcome after failure of shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol, 2003, 170 (6Ptl) : 2198-2201.

共引文献151

同被引文献691

引证文献121

二级引证文献811

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部