期刊文献+

喉罩与气管插管对青光眼患儿血流动力学和眼内压影响的比较 被引量:3

Effect of laryngeal mask airway on the haemodynamic changes and intraocular pressure in glaucomatous children compared with tracheal intubation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究喉罩与气管插管对青光眼患儿血流动力学和眼内压的影响.方法 选取拟择期在全身麻醉下行小梁切开术的青光眼患儿50例,按随机数字表法将患儿分成气管插管组(TT组)和喉罩组,每组25例.分别记录气管插管或置入喉罩的操作时间;咪达唑仑用量;麻醉诱导后(T1)、气管插管或置入喉罩即刻(T2)及气管插管或置入喉罩后1 min(T3)、2min(T4)、3min(T5)、5 min(T)的心率、平均动脉压(MAP)、末梢灌注指数(TPI)和眼内压.结果 两组患儿咪达唑仑用量、操作时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).与T1比较,TT组T2~T4心率、眼内压升高,T2~T3MAP升高,T2~ T5TPI降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);喉罩组各时点心率、MAP、TPI、眼内压比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).喉罩组T2~T4心率、MAP、眼内压低于TT组[心率:(119.3±8.9)、(117.6±8.5)、(115.2±6.9)次/min比(131.3±7.1)、(128.1±6.8)、(123.2±8.6)次/min,MAP:(36.9±5.1)、(37.1±4.8)、(34.7±4.6) mmHg (1mmHg =0.133 kPa)比(44.1±4.9)、(42.8±5.5)、(41.9±7.1)mmHg,眼内压:(27.6±2.5)、(27.0±2.0)、(25.9±2.3) mmHg比(34.2±2.2)、(32.9±1.6)、(31.1±2.2) mmHg],T2~T5TPI高于TT组(3.25±0.28、2.99±0.26、3.15±0.31、3.40±0.30比2.69±0.29、2.22±0.27、2.41±0.30、2.66±0.33),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 青光眼患儿全身麻醉下置入喉罩后心率、MAP、TPI和眼内压均未见显著变化,诱导过程平稳,值得临床推广应用. Objective To compare the response of haemodynamics and intraocular pressure (IOP) to laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and tracheal intubation (TT) in children with glaucoma.Methods A prospective,randomized study was conducted in 50 glaucomatous children,scheduled to undergo trabeculectomy and divided into LMA group (25 cases) and TT group (25 cases) by random digits table method.Endotracheal intubation or placement of the laryngeal mask operation time and the dosage of midazolam was noted in each patient.Heart rate (HR),mean arterial pressure (MAP),tip perfusion index (TPI),IOP were measured after anesthesia induction (T1),endotracheal intubation or placement laryngeal mask immediately (T2),endotracheal intubation or placement after laryngeal mask 1 min (T3),2 min (T4),3 min(T5),5 min(T6).Results There was no significant difference in endotracheal intubation or placement of the laryngeal mask operation time and the dosage of midazolam between two groups (P > 0.05).Compared with T1,HR,IOP were increased at T2-T4,MAP was increased at T2-T3,TPI was decreased at T2-T5 in TT group,there was significant difference(P < 0.05).There was no significant difference in HR,MAP,TPI,IOP among different points in LMA group (P > 0.05).HR,MAP,IOP in LMA group at T2-T4 were lower than those in TT group [HR:(119.3 ±8.9),(117.6 ±8.5),(115.2 ±6.9) beats/min vs.(131.3 ±7.1),(128.1 ±6.8),(123.2 ± 8.6)beats/min,MAP:(36.9 ± 5.1),(37.1 ±4.8),(34.7 ±4.6) mmHg (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa) vs.(44.1 ± 4.9),(42.8 ± 5.5),(41.9 ± 7.1) mmHg,IOP:(27.6 ± 2.5),(27.0 ± 2.0),(25.9 ± 2.3) mmHg vs.(34.2 ± 2.2),(32.9 ± 1.6),(31.1 ± 2.2) mmHg],TPI at T2-T5 was higher than that in TT group (3.25 ± 0.28,2.99 ± 0.26,3.15 ± 0.31,3.40 ± 0.30 vs.2.69 ± 0.29,2.22 ± 0.27,2.41 ± 0.30,2.66 ± 0.33),and there was significant difference (P <0.05).Conclusion Insertion of LMA in glaucomatous children is not associated with significant changes in haemodynamics and IOP response and offers advantages over tracheal intubation.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2014年第3期30-33,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 喉面罩 气管插管 血流动力学 眼内压 青光眼 Laryngeal masks Endotracheal tube Hemodynamics Intraocular pressure Glaucoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1田悦,张丽红,蒋晶晶,刘阳.临床麻醉深度下拔除喉罩对小儿七氟烷麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J].中国医师进修杂志,2013,36(6):18-20. 被引量:4
  • 2Ismail SA,Bisher NA,Kandil HW,et al.Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion d the i-gel,laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2011,28(6):443-448.
  • 3Madan R,Tamilselvan P,Sadhaaivam S,et al.Intra-ocular pressure and haemodynamic changes after tracheal intubation and extubation:a comparative study in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous children[J].Anaesthesia,2000,55 (4):380-384.
  • 4Sahin A,T ü fek A,Cingü AK,et al.The effect of I-gelTM airway on intraocular pressure in pediatric patients who received sevoflurane or desflurane during strabismus surgery[J].Psediatr Anaesth,2012,22(8):772-775.
  • 5Agrawal G,Agarwal M,Taneja S.A randomized comparative study of intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes on insertion of proseal laryngeal mask airway and conventional tracheal intubation in pediatric patients[J].J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol,2012,28(3):326-329.
  • 6方秧青.喉罩通气全身麻醉在高血压患者手术中的效果研究[J].中国医师进修杂志,2012,35(17):67-69. 被引量:4
  • 7张文霞,吕蕴琦,李兰芳,孙瑞广.儿童眼球穿孔伤咪唑安定滴鼻辅助麻醉临床观察[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2004,26(5):315-316. 被引量:1
  • 8Gulati M,Mohta M,Ahuja S,et al.Comparison of laryngeal mask airway with tracheal tube for ophthalmic surgery in paediatric patients[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2004,32(3):383-389.
  • 9Watts P,Lim MK,Gandhewar R,et al.The effect of laryngeal mask airway insertion on intraocular pressure measurement in children receiving general anesthesia[J].Am J Ophthalmol,2007,144(4):507-510.
  • 10Ulrich-Pur H,Hrska F,Krafft P,et al.Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airvay devices[J].Anesthesiology,2006,104(5):933-938.

二级参考文献48

  • 1罗宝蓉,周晓莉,王保国,吴一兵.末梢血管收缩反应预测气管插管血液动力学变化[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(10):743-745. 被引量:3
  • 2Godbout JP,Glaser R. Stress-induced immune dysregulation: implications for wound healing, infectious disease and cancer. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 2006,1 (4) : 421-427.
  • 3Walbum J, Vedhara K, Hankins M, et al. Psychological stress and wound healing in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res, 2009,67 ( 3 ): 253-271.
  • 4Arcangeli A, D'A1 o C, Gaspari R. Dexmedetomidine use in general anaesthesia. Curt Drug Targets, 2009,10(8) : 687-695.
  • 5Yuen VM,Irwin MG,Hui TW,et al. A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg, 2007,105 ( 2 ) : 374-380.
  • 6But AK,Ozgul U,Erdil F,et al. The effects of pre-operative dexmedetomidine infusion on hemodynamics in patients with pulmonary hypertension undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006,50(10) : 1207-1212.
  • 7Chernik DA, Cillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliabilioty of the observers assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam[J]. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990, 10(2):244-251.
  • 8Karl HW, Keifer AT, Rosenbevger JL, et al. Comparision of the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam or sufentanil for preinduetion of anesthesir in pediatric patients[J]. Anesthesiology, 1992, 76 ( 2 ) : 209-215.
  • 9Wilton NCT. Preanaesthetie sedation of preschool children using intranasal midazolam[Jl .Anesthesiology, 1988, 69 ( 6 ): 972-975.
  • 10Malinovsky JM, Leus C, Scrvin F, et al. Plasma concentrations of midazolain after iv, nasal or rectal administration in children[J]. Br J Anaesth,1993,70(6) : 617-620.

共引文献29

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部