期刊文献+

爱力减痛法联合陪伴分娩在初产妇产程中的应用 被引量:2

The influence of accompany delivery love for early maternity epidural analgesia method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察爱力减痛分娩法联合陪伴分娩对初产妇分娩的影响,探讨其在临床应用中的价值。方法观察组160例自产妇妊娠28周开始,由其丈夫陪伴共同进行爱力减痛分娩法系统训练,对照组160例初产妇未进行爱力分娩法训练,只按常规一对一陪伴分娩。观察两组初产妇与助产士的配合情况,记录分娩方式、绘制产程图观察各产程的时间、产后2 h出血量和新生儿窒息情况。结果观察组的剖宫产率、产后2 h出血量和新生儿窒息情况低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组第一产程、第二产程、总产程时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论爱力减痛分娩法可使初产妇充满信心,在产痛和分娩过程中保持镇定,促进自然分娩,降低剖宫产率、缩短产程,减少产后出血量、降低新生儿窒息情况,值得临床推广应用。 【Objective】To observe the influence of accompany delivery love for early maternity epidural analgesia method,to explore its clinical application value.【Methods】160 cases in observation group from 28 weeks of pregnancy,the husband of Lamaze method system training,the control group of 160 cases of primipara without loving labor training,only routine to accompany delivery.To observe the situation with the mothers and midwives at the beginning of two groups,recording mode of delivery,draw partogram observe each labor time,2 h postpartum bleeding and neonatal asphyxia.【Resluts】 the group of cesarean section,postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia of 2 h lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P0.05);observation group of the first stage,the second stage of labor,the total labor time was shorter than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P0.01).【Conclusion】the Lamaze method can make the primipara with confidence,in the pain of labor and delivery process to remain calm,promote natural delivery,reduce the cesarean section rate,shorten birth process,reduce the amount of reduction in neonatal asphyxia,postpartum hemorrhage,worthy of clinical application.
作者 谭莹 孙淑香
出处 《中国医学工程》 2013年第10期19-19,21,共2页 China Medical Engineering
关键词 爱力减痛分娩法 初产妇 产程 accompany delivery love primipara birth process
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1Leung GM, Lam TH, Wong I et al. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales. Caesarean section rates in Hong Kong. BMJ, 2002, 324:7335.
  • 2Aslam MF, Gilmour K, Fawdry RD. Who wants a caesarean section? A study of women's personal experience of vaginal and caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2003, 23:364.
  • 3Penna L, Arulkumaraxn S. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003, 82: 399.
  • 4Lo C. Patients' attitudes vs. physicians' determination: implications for cesarean sections. Social Science &Medicine, 2003, 57:91.
  • 5Chong ES. Mongelli M. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. IntJ Gynaecol Obstet, 2003, 80:189.
  • 6Osis M J, Padua KS, Duarte GA et al. The opinion of Brazilian women regardingaginaabamdesarean section. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2001, 75:59.
  • 7Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C et al. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG, 2002, 109 (6): 618.
  • 8Gamble JA, Greedy DK. Women's preference for a cesarean section:incidence and associated factors. Birth, 2001, 28:101.
  • 9Di Renzo GC. Tocophobia: a new indication for cesarenan delivery? . J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2003, 13:217.
  • 10Gamble JA, Greedy DK. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth, 2000, 27: 256.

共引文献33

同被引文献30

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部