期刊文献+

布拉氏酵母菌散剂防治小儿急性支气管肺炎抗生素相关性腹泻的疗效分析 被引量:57

Efficacy Analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in Prevention and Therapy of Antibiotic-associated Diarrhoea in Children with Acute Bronchopneumonia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨口服布拉氏酵母菌(Saccharomycesboulardii)散剂对防治小儿抗生素相关性腹泻(AAD)的疗效。方法采用随机、对照方法将468例急性支气管肺炎住院患儿分为布拉氏酵母茵干预组(n=233)及空白对照组(n=235),进行为期2周的临床观察。2组均给予针对原发病的标准静脉抗生素治疗。布拉氏酵母茵干预组在基础治疗的同时给予布拉氏酵母菌250mg日2次口服。对照组在出现继发性腹泻后又在原有治疗基础上分为布拉氏酵母菌治疗组和无干预组。结果布拉氏酵母茵组患AAD的风险较空白对照组显著降低[19/233(8.2%)VS63/235(26.8%),RR:0.304,95%CI:0.188~0.492],尤其是降低了头孢呋辛[5/79(6.3%)vs24/83(28.9%),RR:0.219,95%CI:0.088~0.545]及阿莫西林+克拉维酸(7/86(8.1%)VS32/91(35.2%),RR:0.231,95%CI:0.108~0.496]治疗中腹泻的风险。空白对照组出现AAD患儿中,布拉氏酵母菌治疗组治疗3d及5d的好转率均显著高于无干预组(3d:81-3%VS19-4%,P〈0.001;5d:93.8%VS22.6%,P〈0.05)。所有病例均未发生明显不良反应或过敏反应。结论布拉氏酵母茵可有效降低急性支气管肺炎患儿AAD发生率,并对AAD有较好的治疗作用。 Objective To discuss the effect of Saccharomyces boulardii (S. boulardii)on prevention and therapy of antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in children with acute bronchopneumonia. Methods A total of 468 children (aged 6 months to 14 years) with acute bronchopneumonia were included. First, all the children received standard antibiotic treatment and were divided into two groups : S. boulardii group (n =233 ) and con- trol group (n =235 ). The children in S. boulardii group received 250 mg of S. boulardii, orally twice daily for the duration of antibiotic treatment. Analyses were based on treatment and included data for 2 weeks' observation. Second, the patients in the control group who had AAD during the antibiotic treatment were also divided into two groups : S. boulardii treatment group and no intervention group. Results Patients receiving S. bou/ar- dii had a lower prevalence of diarrhoea than the control group [ 19 of 233 ( 8.2% ) vs 63 of 235 ( 26.8% ), relative risk (RR) : 0.304,95% confidence interval ( CI ) : O. 188 - 0.492 ], especially the diarrhea risk induced by cefuroxime [ 5/79 ( 6.3% ) vs 24/83 ( 28.9% ), RR: 0.219,95% CI : 0.088 - 0.545 ] and amoxicillin+clavulanate [ 7/86 ( 8.1% ) vs 32/91 ( 35.2% ), RR: 0.231,95%CI : O. 108 -0.496 ] was reduced. The improvement rates after 3 days ( 81.3% vs 19.4%, )(2--24.135, P 〈 0.001 ) and 5 days (93.8% vs 22.6%, X2=32.905, P 〈 0.05 ) of S. bou/ard/i treatment were all significantly higher than that of the no intervention group. No adverse events were observed. Condusion S. boulardii also has good prevention and therapeutical effects on AAD in children with acute bronchoDneumonia.
出处 《中国医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期55-58,63,共5页 Journal of China Medical University
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金(2013021017)
关键词 抗生素相关性腹泻 布拉氏酵母菌 小儿急性支气管肺炎 Saecharomyces boulardii antibiotic-associated diarrhea children with acute bronchopneumonia
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Bartlett JG, Chang TW, Gurwith M, et al.Antibiotic-associated pseu- domembranous colitis due to toxin producing clostridia[J]. N Engl J Med, 1978,298(10) :531-534.
  • 2薛辛东.儿科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:271.
  • 3Barbut F, Meynard JL, Guiguet M, et al. Clostridium difficile-associ- ated diarrhoea in HIV infected patients : epidemiology and risk fac- tors[J]. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 1997,16(3) : 176-181.
  • 4Mcfarland LV, Surawicz CM, Stamm WE. Risk factors for clostridi- um difficile carriage and C. difficile-associated diarrhoea in a cohort of hospitalized patients [ J ]. J Infect Dis, 1990,162 (3) : 678-684.
  • 5Wistro MJ, Norrby SR, Myhre EB, et al. Frequency of antibiotic-as-sociated diarrhoea in 2462 antibiotic-treated hospitalized patients : a prospective study[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,2001,47( 1 ) :43-50.
  • 6Mcfarland LV. Epidemiology, risk factors and treatments for antibiot- ic-associated diarrhoea[J]. Dig Dis, 1998,16(5 ) :292-307.
  • 7Turck D, Bernet JP, Marx J, et al. Incidence and risk factors of oral antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in an outpatient pediatric population [J ]. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 2003,37 ( 1 ) : 22-26.
  • 8Elstner CL, Lindsay AN, Book LS, et al. Lack of relationship of Clos- tridium difficile to antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in children [Jl. Pediatr Inf Dis, 1983,2 (5) : 364-366.
  • 9Guandalini S. Probiotics for prevention and treatment of diarrhea [ J ]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2011,45 (Suppl) : S 149-S 153.
  • 10Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intesti- nal transit time[Jl. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1997,32(9) :920-924.

二级参考文献28

  • 1唐秋雨,林滨榕,吴斌,黄妙辉.小儿肺炎继发腹泻相关因素分析及微生态制剂的预防作用[J].中国实用儿科杂志,2005,20(12):732-734. 被引量:119
  • 2楚杰,王凤山,张大伟.布拉酵母菌的生物学作用及防治疾病应用研究进展[J].药物生物技术,2006,13(1):71-73. 被引量:52
  • 3陈丽琼,包芸芸,高淑强.口服锌制剂联合思密达治疗小儿秋季腹泻疗效观察[J].儿科药学杂志,2006,12(2):26-27. 被引量:42
  • 4周正任.细菌的耐药性与控制策略[M]//龙北国,江丽芳.高级医学微生物学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:129-142.
  • 5Katz JA. Probiotics for the prevention of antibioticassociated diarrheaand elostridium diitle- ile diarrhea [ J ]. J Clin Gastroenteml, 2006, 40 (3): 249-255.
  • 6Dendukuri N, Costa V, Me Gregor M, et al. Probiotic therapy for the prevention and treatment of elostfidium diffieile ssoeiated diarrhea [J]. Can Med Assoe J, 2005, 173 (2): 167-170.
  • 7Meier RF. Probioties: a new treatment for antibiotieassociated diarrhea [ J ]. Digestion, 2005, 72 (1): 49-50.
  • 8胡亚美 江载芳 诸福棠.实用儿科学[M]第7版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.1900.
  • 9胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:632-636.
  • 10杨锡强,易著文.儿科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:308

共引文献118

同被引文献413

二级引证文献303

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部