期刊文献+

经倾向指数匹配后的GP方案与NP方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效评价 被引量:10

Effect Evaluation between GP and NP Regimens in Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Propensity Score Matching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【提要】目的将非小细胞肺癌患者分为吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP)方案和长春瑞滨联合顺铂(NP)方案两组,用倾向指数匹配法均衡组问的协变量,评价两种治疗方案的效果。方法以分组变量为因变量,协变量为白变量建立logistic回归模型,计算非小细胞肺癌病人的倾向指数,然后按照倾向指数进行组间卡钳匹配,对匹配后的数据进行生存分析。结果匹配前GP组和NP组的中位生存期分别为2.12年和2.18年;其置信区间分别为(1.76~2.51)年和(1.82~2.54)年:GP组和NP组的1年生存率分别为83.98%和85.25%;2年生存率分别为55.68%和58.13%;3年生存率分别为23.47%和24.99%。Logrank检验两组生存曲线间没有统计学差异(P〉0.05)。匹配后中位生存时间分别为1.96年和2.31年;其置信区间分别为(1.56~2.36)年及(1.87~2.66)年;GP组和NP组的1年生存率分别为82.83%和85.23%;2年生存率分别为49.29%和58.04%;3年生存率分别为23.18%和25.26%。Logrank检验结果表明两组生存曲线之间差别无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论采用倾向指数匹配法能有效的降低混杂偏倚,GP和NP两种化疗方案均可作为NSCLC的一线治疗方案。 Objective To evaluate the effects between combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin(GP) and combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin(NP) on two groups of non-small cell lung cancer patients after balancing the covariates by propensity score. Methods The logistic regression model was established where the treatment assignment was taken as the dependent varia- ble and the covariates were taken as the independent variables. For each NSCLC patient, the propensity score was calculated for caliper matching and a survival analysis of the matched data were carded out. Results Before matching, the median survival time(MST) of GP and NP were 2. 12 and 2. lg years,and the confidence interval(CI) were 1.76 -2. 51 years and 1.82 -2. 54 years. One-,two-,and three-year survival rates were 83.98% and 85.25% ,55.68% and 58.13% ,23.47% and 24. 99% respec- tively. The Logrank test showed that there was no significant differences in the overall survival rate between the two groups( P 〉 0. 05 ). After matching, the MST of GP and NP were 1.96 and 2. 31 years, and the CI were 1.56 - 2. 36 years and 1.87 - 2. 66 years. One-,two-,and three-year survival rates were 82. 83% and 85.23% ,49. 29% and 58. 04% ,23.18% and 25.26% respec- tively. The Logrank test showed that there was no significant differences in the overall survival rate between the two groups( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Propensity score matching can effectively reduce the confounding bias of non-randomized clinical observa- tional data. Both GP and NP regimens could be used as the original chemotherapy for NSCLC.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期34-36,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基金 国家自然科学基金(81141112 81101290) 山东省自然科学基金(ZR2009CM117)
关键词 倾向指数 匹配法 非小细胞肺癌 生存分析 Propensity score Matching method Non-small cell lung cancer Survival analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1赵霞.GP与NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC的临床对比观察[J].临床肺科杂志,2007,12(6):643-644. 被引量:2
  • 2Shenyang Guo, Richard P Barth, Claire Gibbons. Propensity score matching strategies for evaluating substance abuse services for child welfare clients [J]. Children and Youth Services Review, 2006, 28 : 357-383.
  • 3Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs [J]. N Engl J Med, 2000, 342: 1887-1892.
  • 4Miettinen OS. Stratification by a multivariate confounder score [J]. Am J Epidemiol. 1976, 104: 609-620.
  • 5Helena Marti, Jon Perez-Bareena, Miquel Fiol. Analysis with the propensity score of the association between likelihood of treatment and event of interest in observational studies [J]. An example with myocardial reperfusion, 2005, 58: 126-136.
  • 6Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J]. Biometrika, 1983, 70: 41-55.
  • 7Til Sturmer, Manisha Joshi, Robert I. Glynn. A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different esti- mates compared with conventional muhivariable methods [JJ. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006, 59 : 437-447.
  • 8Andrew C. Leon, Donald Hedeker. Quintile stratification based on a misspeeified propensity score in longitudinal treatment effectiveness analyses of ordinal doses [J].Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2007, 51: 6114-6122.
  • 9Rajeev Dehejia. Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2005, 125: 355- 364.
  • 10Jeffrey A. Smith, Petra E. Todd. Does matching overcome LaLonde' s critique of nonexperimental estimators [J]? Journal of Econometrics, 2005, 125: 305-353.

共引文献62

同被引文献86

  • 1付秀娟,刘凯,李建树,沈靖,洪德庆.影响青少年血压偏高的因素探讨[J].中国学校卫生,1994,15(5):367-368. 被引量:8
  • 2叶敬忠,王伊欢.留守儿童的监护现状与特点[J].人口学刊,2006,28(3):55-59. 被引量:135
  • 3张迎修,王淑荣,张朋才.血压偏高儿童的生长发育和体质特点[J].中国学校卫生,2006,27(8):669-670. 被引量:10
  • 4张莉华.具有“留守经历”大学生的心理分析[J].当代青年研究,2006(12):28-30. 被引量:93
  • 5周宗奎,孙晓军,范翠英.农村留守儿童心理发展问题与对策[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6):119-125. 被引量:65
  • 6Hong S,Youn YN, Yi G, et al. Long Term Results of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction versus Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft- ing :Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2012,27 (2) :153-159.
  • 7Oh KH, Hwang YH, Cho JH, et al. Outcome of early initiation of peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Korean Med Sci ,2012,27 (2) : 170-176.
  • 8Wisnivesky JP, Halm EA, Bonomi M, et al. Postoperative radiothera- py for elderly patients with stage llI lung cancer. Cancer, 2012,2 (13) :265-285.
  • 9Apolone G, Deandrea S, Montanari M, et al. Evaluation of the com- parative analgesic effectiveness of transdermal and oral opioids in cancer patients: A propensity score analysis. Eur J Pain. 2012, 16 (2) :229-238.
  • 10Hong S, Youn YN, Yi G, et al. Long Term Results of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction versus Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction after Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft- ing :Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Korean Med Sci ,2012,27 (2) :153-159.

引证文献10

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部