期刊文献+

康德美学中审美愉快与官能和谐之关系

The Relationship between Aesthetic Pleasure and the Harmony among the Faculties in Kantian Aesthetics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知性和想象力两种官能的和谐运动与审美愉快之间的关系,是理解康德审美判断的关键之处。只有正确认识两者的关系,才能理解审美判断为什么不带概念却普遍有效,才能理解康德所说的"感性的意识到"官能和谐的含义。对两者的关系有着因果性与意向性两种阐释可能。通过比较这两种阐释,可以得出这样的论断:审美愉快具有意向性特征,它与官能和谐之间的关系是意向性的。 The relationship between aesthetic pleasure and the harmony of intellect and imagination is crucial to understand- ing the aesthetic judgments in Kantian aesthetics. A correct understanding of this relationship can help us find out why these judgments, though containing no concepts, are universally valid and what Kant means by " sensually perceiving" the harmo- ny among the faculties. There are two interpretations of this relationship, one of causality and one of intention, and a con- clusion can be drawn from a comparison of these two interpretations, namely, aesthetic pleasure has intentional features and its relationship with the harmony among the faculties is intentional.
作者 陶锋
机构地区 南开大学哲学院
出处 《美育学刊》 2014年第1期35-40,共6页 Journal of Aesthetic Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目<阿多诺美学与语言理论关系之研究>(13YJC720033) 南开大学哲学院"985工程"青年教师科研资助项目(NKZX985QN-201301)的研究成果
关键词 官能和谐 审美愉快 意向性 二次反思 harmony among the faculties aesthetic pleasure intentionality Second reflection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Paul Guyer. Kant and the Claims of Taste[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1997.
  • 2Henry E Allison. Kant's Theory of Taste:A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.
  • 3Henry E Allison. Pleasure and Harmony in Kant's Theory of Taste:A Critique of the Causal Reading[A].Berlin & New York:Walter de Gruyter,1998.
  • 4Rachel Zuckert. A New Look at Kant's Theory of Pleasure[J].The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,2002,(03):239-252.
  • 5康德;邓晓芒.判断力批判[M]北京:人民出版社,2002.
  • 6Kant,Paul Guyer,Eric Matthews. Critique of the Power of Judgment[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000.
  • 7Günter Z(o)ller. Toward the Pleasure Principle,Kant's Transcendental Psychology of the Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure[A].Bonn:Bouvier,1991.812.
  • 8Richard Aquila. A New Look at Kant's Aesthetic Judgment[A].Chicago & London:University of Chicago Press,1982.48.
  • 9Hannah Ginsborg. Aesthetic Judging and the Intentionality of Pleasure[J].INQUIRY,2003,(02):164-181.
  • 10Joseph Canon. The Intentionality of Judgments of Taste in Kant's Critique of Judgment[J].The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,2008,(01):53-65.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部