期刊文献+

英国高等教育外部质量评价的转型与发展研究 被引量:8

Research on the Transition and Development of External Higher Education Quality Evaluation in UK
原文传递
导出
摘要 英国大学有着院校自治和学术自由的传统,同时英国高等教育也十分重视维护基本的学术标准,并以法制引导高等教育的转型与发展。在英国高等教育外部质量评价的发展进程中,政府通过外部问责、法制推动、质量提升和以生为本的评价策略,不断引导着大学的实质性自治;而另一方面,无论是原有的质量核证,还是新的质量检视都重点强调"轻触或微触"、"门槛标准"、"量体裁衣式"的检视方式,以保障大学的程序性自治。所以,英国高等教育的外部质量评价的转型实际上也是政府与大学相互博弈的结果,转型与发展中所积累的丰富经验及其背后成因,也将为其他国家形成适合于自身特点的评价方法提供一种借鉴。 This article introduces that British universities have the tradition of professional autonomy and academic freedom. The threshold academic standards are also attached importance to in British higher education, and the legal systems are taken to steer the transition and development of higher education. The British government continuously guides university substantive autonomy through some evaluation strategies in the developing process of external higher education evaluation in UK such as accountability, legal system, quality enhancement and students at the heart of the system. At the same time, either the former quality audit or the new quality review keeps focus on the review methods for "light-touch or lighter touch", "Tailoring reviews to individual circumstances" and "threshold standards" to protect university procedural autonomy. So the transition of British external higher education evaluation actually is the result of gaming between government and universities. The profuse experience accumulated and their reasons formed in the transition and development will provide other countries which develop characteristic evaluation methods suited themselves for reference.
作者 张红峰
机构地区 澳门理工学院
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期35-41,共7页 China Higher Education Research
基金 澳门理工学院研究项目"澳门高校内部治理机制与制度构建研究"(项目编号:RP/OTHER-01/2013)的研究成果之一
关键词 高等教育质量评价 转型 英国 自治 higher education quality evaluation transition UK autonomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1哈耶克.自由宪章[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999,10..
  • 2Fuhon, Oliver. Slouching towards a Mass System: Society, Government and Institutions in the United Kingdom[J]: Higher education, 1991, 21(04): 589-605.
  • 3Robinson, Philip. The Contribution of Higher Education to GRIST Meeting the Challenge of the White Paper[J]. British Journal of In-Service Education(Routledge), 1988, 14 (02): 100-104.
  • 4Dearing, Ron. Higher Education in the Learning Society[R/ OL]//The Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (The Dearing Report), 1997: Report 1, Repot 11. [2013-06-30]http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ ncihe.
  • 5QAA. The Framework for Higher Education Qualification in England, Wales and Northern Ireland[R/OL]. (2008)[2013- 06-30 ] http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/ InformationAndGui Q08.pdf.
  • 6MCGHEE, Patrick: The academic quality handbook: Enhancing higher education in universities and furthereducation colleges[M]. London &Sterling VA: Kogan Page Limited, 2003:11-21.
  • 7QAA. Subject benchmark statements[EB/OL]. [2013-06- 30 ] http://www.qaa.ac.uk/AssuringStandardsAndQuality/ subject-guidance/Pages/Subj ect-benchmark-statements. aspx.
  • 8The Higher Education Academy. Constuctive Alignment-and why it is important to the learning process[EB/OL].(2011) [ 2013-06-28 ] http://exchange .ac .uk/learning-and-teaching- theory-guide/constructive-alignment.html.
  • 9QAA. The UK Quality Code for Higher Education[R/OL]. (2011 ) [ 2013 -07 -01 ] http://www.qaa, ac.uk/ AssuringStandardsAndQuality/quality-code/Pages/defauh. aspx.
  • 10Mohn R. Evolution in higher education[J]. Higher Education Management, 1991, 3(03): 306-311.

二级参考文献17

  • 1伯顿·R·克拉克.高等教育系统:学术组织的跨国研究[M].杭州:杭州大学出版社,1994.12..
  • 2Mohn R. Evolution in higher education[J ]. Higher Education Management, 1991,3(03):307.
  • 3The Robbins Report for the Cabinet[R/OL].(1963-10-01) [2012-09-05] http://filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/ small/cab- 129-114-c- 173.pdf.
  • 4Walford G. Changing relationship between government and higher education in Britain[M]//Neave G, Van Vught F A. Prometheus bound: the changing relationship between government and higher education in western Europe.Oxford: Pergamon, 1991:167-169.
  • 5Brennan J, Shah T. Higher education policy in the United Kingdom[M]//Goedegebuure L, Kaiser F, Maassen P, Meek L, Van Vught F, Weert E D. Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective.Oxford: Pergamon, 1994:292.
  • 6Fulton O. Differentiation and diversity in a newly unitary system: The case of the UK[M]//Meek L, Goedegebuure L, Kivinen O, Rinne R. The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education.Oxford: Pergamon, 1996:177-178.
  • 7Cabinet office. Machinery of Government: Creation of the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills[R/OL]. [ 2012-09-08 ] http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/332757/bis-mog-changes-julyOg.pdf.
  • 8Conduct of Board business[EB/OL].(2012-1-20)[2012-09- 08] http://www.hefce.ac.uk/about/staff/board/members/.
  • 9Berdabl, Robert.A,.ademic Freedom, Autonomy and Accountability in British Universities [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1990,15(02):169-180.
  • 10Harry De Boer, Jeroen Huisman, Claudia Meister-Scheytt. Supervision in "Modem" University Governance: Boards under Scrutiny[J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2010,35 (03):317-333.

共引文献69

同被引文献78

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部