期刊文献+

BD Phoenix^(TM)酵母菌鉴定板对临床分离酵母菌鉴定能力的评估 被引量:1

Evaluation of BD Phoenix^(TM) in identification of the yeast by using clinical yeasts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估BD PhoenixTM酵母菌鉴定板对酵母菌的鉴定能力。方法选取白念珠菌18株,热带念珠菌22株,光滑念珠菌19株,克柔念珠菌8株,近平滑念珠菌20株,新生隐球菌14株,季也蒙念珠菌4株,平常念珠菌1株,葡萄牙念珠菌1株,头状地霉2株,挪威念珠菌1株,链状念珠菌1株,乳酒念珠菌1株,希木龙念珠菌1株,解脂念珠菌3株,皱褶念珠菌1株,菌膜念珠菌3株,共计120株。借助PhoenixTM100全自动微生物鉴定仪,使用BD PhoenixTM酵母菌鉴定板鉴定上述菌株。用真菌通用引物ITS1与ITS4对所有受试菌株的rDNA进行PCR扩增,对PCR产物进行序列测定、分析并作为金标准与BD PhoenixTM酵母菌鉴定板的结果比较,同时使用MALDI-TOF MS质谱分析对试验菌株进行菌种鉴定。结果 BD PhoenixTM酵母菌鉴定板除了对1株挪威念珠菌、1株平常念珠菌、1株解脂念珠菌、1株皱褶念珠菌未能鉴定以及1株链状念珠菌、1株克柔念珠菌、2株菌膜念珠菌、1株解脂念珠菌鉴定错误外其余试验菌株鉴定均正确,鉴定准确率为92.5%。所有鉴定结果均在17 h内获得,而白念珠菌、热带念珠菌、近平滑念珠菌的鉴定时间均小于6 h,并且不受推荐培养基的限制。所有菌株MALDI-TOF MS的鉴定结果与其rDNA ITS序列分析的结果完全一致。结论 BD PhoenixTM酵母菌鉴定板对多数酵母菌能够快速准确地鉴定到种,但对某些少见酵母菌的鉴定能力有待进一步考证。 Objective To evaluate the ability of BD PhoenixTM in identification of the yeast isolated from clinical speciemen.Methods 18 strains of Candida albicans,22 strains of C.tropicalis,19 strains of C.glabrata,8 strains of C.krusei,20 strains of C.parapsilosis,4 strains of C.guilliermondii,1 strain of C.inconspicua,C.lusitaniae,C.norvegensis,C.catenulata,C.kefyr,C.haemulonii,C.rugosa respectively,3 strains of C.lipolytica,3 strains of C.pelliculosa,2 strains of Geotrichum capitatum,14 strains of Cryptococcus neoformans were tested.The total of 120 stains were all isolated from clinical specimen.They were identified by using automated PhoenixTM 100 to test the BD PhoenixTM.The fungus-specific universal primers ITS1 and ITS4 were used to amplify the rDNA of isolates mentioned above.The products of PCR were sequenced and analyzed,which were compared with BD PhoenixTM as golden standard.MALDI-TOF MS were also used to identify all the tested strains.Results By using BD PhoenixTM,1 strain of C.norvegensis,C.inconspicua,C.lipolytica,C.kefyr,C.rugosa cant be identified and 1 strain of C.catenulate,1 strain of C.krusei,2 strains of C.pelliculosa and 1 strain of C.lipolytica had the wrong results.The other results were correct.The precision of identification for BD PhoenixTM was 92.5%.All the results were obtained in 17 hours.It took us less than 6 hours to identify C.albicans,C.tropicalis and C.parapsilosis without influence of proposed media.There was no difference between identification results of rDNA ITS sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS.Conclusions Most yeasts can be identified to the species level quickly and correctly by BD PhoenixTM But its ability of identifying some uncommon yeasts need to be tested.
出处 《中国真菌学杂志》 CSCD 2013年第5期281-284,共4页 Chinese Journal of Mycology
基金 十二五国家新药创制科技重大专项(2011ZXZ09307-001) 中国医学科学院协和青年基金(2012X03)
关键词 酵母菌 鉴定 BD Phoenix^TM酵母菌鉴定板 序列测定 质谱分析 yeast identification BD PhoenixTM DNA sequencing MALDI-TOF MS
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1徐红,温海.临床常见酵母菌的特征和鉴定[J].中国真菌学杂志,2006,1(5):304-307. 被引量:2
  • 2Leaw SN, Chang HC, Sun HF, et al. Identification of medically important yeast species by sequence analysis of the internal tran- scribed spacer regions [ J ]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006,44 ( 3 ) : 693- 699.
  • 3Land GA, Salkin IF, el-Zaatari M, et al. Evaluation of the Baxter- MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 1991,29 (4) :718-722.
  • 4Espinel-Ingroff A, Stockman L, Roberts G, et, al. Comparison of RapiD yeast plus system with API 20C system for identification of common, new, and emerging yeast pathogens[ J]. J Clin Micro- bio1,1998,36(4) :883-886.
  • 5徐红,温海,陈江汉,黄欣.RapIDYeast Plus系统在鉴定常见酵母中的临床应用[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(2):215-216. 被引量:1
  • 6McGinnis MR, Molina TC, Pierson DL,et al. Evaluation of the Biolog MicroStation system for yeast identification. [J]. J Med Vet Mycol, 1996,34 ( 5 ) :349-352.
  • 7Marklein G, Josten M, Klanke U, et al. Matrix-assisted laser de- sorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for fast and re- liable identification of clinical yeast isolates[ J]. J Clin Microbi- ol,2009,47(9) :2912-2917.
  • 8OHara CM. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram negative bacilli [ J ]. J Clin Microbio1,2006,44 ( 3 ) :928-933.
  • 9Pincus DH, Orenga S, Chatellier S. Yeast identification-past, present, and future methods [ J ]. Med Mycol,2007,45 ( 2 ) :97- 121.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Heela JS,Sotomayor E,Coon K,et al.Comparison of the RaPIDYeast Plus panel with the API20c yeast system for identification of clinically significant isolates of candida species[J].J Clin Microbiol,1998,36:1443-1445.
  • 2Kitch TT,Jacobs MR,McGinnis MR,et al.Ability of RaPID Yeast Plus system to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours[J].J Clin Microbiol,1996,34:1069-1071.
  • 3Fenn JP,Segal H,Barland B,et al.Comparison of updated Vitek yeast biochemical card and API20c yeast identification systems[J].J Clin Microbiol,1994,32:1184-1187.

共引文献1

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部