期刊文献+

改良去骨瓣减压术治疗重型颅脑损伤的临床效果 被引量:14

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良去骨瓣开颅减压手术治疗重型颅脑损伤患者的临床效果。方法选择收治的252例重型颅脑损伤患者,根据手术方式的不同随机分为观察组和对照组各126例,观察组采用改良去骨瓣开颅术治疗,对照组采用标准外伤大骨瓣减压术,比较两组的临床治疗效果。结果所有患者经6个月随访,按GOS评分观察组总有效率为61.90%(78/126),对照组总有效率为40.48%(51/126),观察组临床治疗效果显著高于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的并发症发生率为7.94%(10/126),对照组的并发症发生率为27.78%(35/126),观察组并发症发生率显著低于对照组,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论改良去骨瓣开颅术是治疗重型颅脑损伤疗效显著,术后并发症少,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified operation craniotomy decompression in the treatment of patients with severe craniocerebral injury. Methods Choose the hospital 252 cases of severe craniocerebral injury patients, according to the different methods of surgery were randomly divided into observation group and control group 126 cases, observation group modified to bone flap craniotomy treatment, control group adopts standard trauma big bone flap decompression, comparing two groups of clinical therapeutic effect.Results All patients were followed up after six months, according to GOS score observation group, the total effective rate was 61.90%(78/126), the control group, the total effective rate was 40.48%(51/126)in the observation group was significantly due to the clinical treatment control group, two group difference was statistically significant (P&lt;0.05); observation group complication rate was 7.94%(10/126), the control group complication rate was 27.78%(35/126)in the observation group complication. The incidence was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was significant (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion Improvements to craniotomy is the treatment of severe head injury a significant effect, fewer postoperative complications, worthy of clinical application.
出处 《当代医学》 2014年第5期6-7,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 重型颅脑损伤 改良去骨瓣减压 治疗 Severe craniocerebral injury Improved bone disc decompression Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

  • 1王喜国,宋保新,金大战,王建星,欧洋.去大骨瓣减压术后并发症的临床分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(6):463-463. 被引量:53
  • 2吴思荣.外伤后急性弥漫性脑肿胀研究进展[J].国外医学(神经病学.神经外科学分册),1996,23(5):257-260. 被引量:165
  • 3江基尧.介绍一种美国临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,14:381-381.
  • 4Jeremitsky E,Omert L,Dunham CM,et al.Harbingers of poor outcome the day after severe brain injury:hypothermia,hypoxia,and hypoperfusion[J].J Trauma,2003,54(2):312-319.
  • 5Kilincer C,Asil T,Utku U,et a1.Factors affecting the outcome of decompressive craniectomy for large hemispheric infarctions:a prospective cohort study[J].Acta Neurochir (Wien),2005,147 (6):587-594.
  • 6Qiu W,Zhang Y,Sheng H,et al.Effects of therapeutic mild hypothermia on patients with severe traumatic brain injury after craniotomy[J].J Crit Care,2007,22(3):229-235.
  • 7Jiang JY,Gao GY,Li WP,et al.Early indicators of prognosis in 846 cases of severe traumatic brain injury[J].J Neurotrauma,2002,19(7):869-874.
  • 8Skoglund TS,Eriksson-Ritzen C,Jensen C,et al.Aspects on decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic head injuries[J].J Neurotrauma,2006,23(10):1502-1509.
  • 9GUERRA W K,GAAB M R,DIETZ H,et al.Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling:indications and results[J].J Neurosurg,1999,90(2):187.
  • 10MESSING-JUNGER A M,MARZOG J,WOBKER G,et al.Decompressive craniectomy in severe brain injury[J].Zentralbl Neurochir,2003,64(4):171-177.

共引文献112

同被引文献98

引证文献14

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部