期刊文献+

腹股沟嵌顿疝一期无张力修补术中不使用抗生素的临床观察 被引量:17

Clinical research of no use of antibiotics in patients undergoing tension-free repair with incarcerated inguinal hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨腹股沟嵌顿疝行一期无张力修补术围手术期不使用抗生素的安全性。方法根据随机数字表将合肥市第二人民医院普外科2011年1月至2013年7月326例因腹股沟嵌顿疝行一期无张力修补术患者分为观察组(围手术期不使用抗生素组)192例,对照组(围手术期使用抗生素组)134例。并比较两组术后早期切口感染,以及患者术后白细胞计数及中性粒细胞计数。结果对照组和观察组术后切口红肿发生率、切口感染率差异均无统计学意义[7.29%(14/192)比3.73%(5/134)、0.52%(1/192)比1.49%(2/134),均P〉0.05]。对照组与观察组术后第3天白细胞计数和中性粒细胞计数差异也均无统计学意义[(7.9±0.6)×109/L比(7.8±0.7)×109/L,(4.9±0.5)×109/L比(5.0±0.5)×109/L,U=1.344、1.777,P=0.180、0.077]。结论无高危人群嵌顿性腹股沟疝肠管无坏死时行一期无张力修补术使用抗生素并无必要。 Objective To explore the safety in inguinal incarcerated hernia repair without use of antibiotics. Methods Retrospective statistical analysis was performed for a total 326 patients with inguinal incarcerated hernia repair at our hospital from January 2011 to July 2013. They were divided into 2 groups of non-using ( n = 192) and using ( n = 134) antibiotics. Statistical analysis of early postoperative infection was performed for two groups. Results The total incision infection had no statistical difference between two groups (7.29% (14/192) vs 3.73% ( 5/134 ), 0. 52% ( 1/192 ) vs 1.49% ( 2/134 ), both P 〉 0. 05 ). Further comparison of leukocyte count and neutrophil count at Day 3 showed no inter-group statistical difference ((7.9±0.6) x109vs(7.8±0.7) ×109/L, (4.9±0.5) ×109vs(5.0±0.5) ×109/L; U= 1. 344, 1. 777 ; P = 0. 180, 0. 077 ). Conclusion It is unnecessary to use preventive antibiotics in patients undergoing tension-free repair with incarcerated inguinal hernia without high-risk infection or bowel necrosis.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期293-295,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 腹股沟 抗菌药 感染 Hernia, inguinal Anti-bacterial agents Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献8

共引文献5913

同被引文献111

  • 1佟建秋,张颖,张振文,向海兵.疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟复发疝46例[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(8):2253-2254. 被引量:30
  • 2LeBlanc K A, Allain Jr B W, Streetman W C. Laparoscopic Ingui- nal Hernia Repair[ M ]//Management of Abdominal Hernias. Spfi- ngerLondon, 2013 : 271 - 283.
  • 3Peach G ,Tan LC. Small bowel obstruction and perforation due to a displaced spiral tacker:a rare complication of laparuscopic in guinal hernia repair [ J ]. Hernia,2008,12 ( 3 ) :303 - 305.
  • 4Holzheimer RG.Low recurrence rate in hernia repair--results in 300patients with open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia[J].Eur J Med Res,2007,12(1):1-5.
  • 5Bisgaard T,Bay-Nielsen M,Kehlet H.Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia.A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair[J].Ann Surg,2008,247(4):707-711.
  • 6Kumari V,Biswas N,Mitra N,et al.Is ligation of hernial sac during orchiopexy mandatory[J]?J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg,2009,14(2):66-67.
  • 7Sanchez-Manuel FJ, Lozano-Garcia J, Seco-Gil JL. Antibiotic proph- ylaxis for hernia repair [ J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012(2) : CD003769.
  • 8Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension-freehemioplasty[ J] . Am J Surg, 1989 ,157 (2) : 188-193.
  • 9Ferdinand Kockerling, Andreas Koch, Ralph Lorenz, et al. Howlong do we need to follow-up our hernia patients to find the realrecurrence rate? [ J ] . Frontiers Surg,2015 , 2 : 1-5.
  • 10Burcharth J, Andresen K, Pommergaard HC, et al. Recurrencepatterns of direct and indirect inguinal hernias in a nationwidepopulation[ J]. Surgery, 2013 , 2.

引证文献17

二级引证文献131

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部