期刊文献+

Nature Conservation versus Scenic Quality:A GIS Approach towards Optimized Tourist Tracks in a Protected Area of Northwest Yunnan,China 被引量:2

Nature Conservation versus Scenic Quality:A GIS Approach towards Optimized Tourist Tracks in a Protected Area of Northwest Yunnan,China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Development of appropriate tourism infrastructure is important for protected areas that allow public access for tourism use.This is meant to avoid or minimize unfavourable impacts on natural resources through guiding tourists for proper use.In this paper,a GIS-based method,the least-cost path(LCP) modelling,is explored for planning tourist tracks in a World Heritage site in Northwest Yunnan(China),where tourism is increasing rapidly while appropriate infrastructure is almost absent.The modelling process contains three steps:1) selection of evaluation criteria(physical,biological and landscape scenic) that are relevant to track decision; 2) translation of evluation criteria into spatially explicit cost surfaces with GIS,and 3) use of Dijkstra's algorithm to determine the least-cost tracks.Four tracks that link main entrances and scenic spots of the study area are proposed after optimizing all evaluation criteria.These tracks feature lowenvironmental impacts and high landscape qualities,which represent a reasonable solution to balance tourist use and nature conservation in the study area.In addtion,the study proves that the LCP modelling can not only offer a structured framwork for track planning but also allow for different stakeholders to participate in the planning process.It therefore enhances the effectivenss of tourism planning and managemnt in protected areas. Development of appropriate tourism infrastructure is important for protected areas that allow public access for tourism use.This is meant to avoid or minimize unfavourable impacts on natural resources through guiding tourists for proper use.In this paper,a GIS-based method,the least-cost path(LCP) modelling,is explored for planning tourist tracks in a World Heritage site in Northwest Yunnan(China),where tourism is increasing rapidly while appropriate infrastructure is almost absent.The modelling process contains three steps:1) selection of evaluation criteria(physical,biological and landscape scenic) that are relevant to track decision; 2) translation of evluation criteria into spatially explicit cost surfaces with GIS,and 3) use of Dijkstra's algorithm to determine the least-cost tracks.Four tracks that link main entrances and scenic spots of the study area are proposed after optimizing all evaluation criteria.These tracks feature lowenvironmental impacts and high landscape qualities,which represent a reasonable solution to balance tourist use and nature conservation in the study area.In addtion,the study proves that the LCP modelling can not only offer a structured framwork for track planning but also allow for different stakeholders to participate in the planning process.It therefore enhances the effectivenss of tourism planning and managemnt in protected areas.
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2014年第1期142-155,共14页 山地科学学报(英文)
基金 funded by the CEMSIT project from the Flemish Inter-university Council of Belgium the grant(No.31160101)from National Natural Science Foundation of China
关键词 TOURIST track Spatial optimisation NATURE CONSERVATION Landscape SCENIC QUALITY Protected area Tourist track Spatial optimisation Nature conservation Landscape scenic quality Protected area
  • 相关文献

参考文献80

  • 1Adriaensen F, Chardona JP, De Blustc G, et al. (2003) The application of 'least-cost' modeling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64(4): 233-247. DOI: lo.lm6/So169-2o46(o2)oo242-6.
  • 2Appleton JH (1975) The Experience of Landscapes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UIC.
  • 3Appleton JH (1996) The Experience of Landscapes (2nd edition). John Wiley & Sons, Chiehester, UI~.
  • 4Atkinson DM, Deadman P, Dudyeha D, et al. (2005) Multi-criteria evaluation and least cost path analysis for an arctic all-weatherroad. Applied Geography 25(4): 287-307. DOI: lO.lOl6/j.apgeog. 2005.o8.ool.
  • 5Beinat E (1997) Value Functions for Environmental Management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Beza BB (2OLO) The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning 97(4): 3o6-317. DOI: lO.lOl6/j.landurbplan.2OlO.O7.OO3.
  • 6Bishop ID, Wherrett JR, Miller DR (2ool) Assessment of path choices on a country walk using a virtual environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 52(4): 225~237. DOI: lO.lO15/So169-2o46.
  • 7(00)00118-3. Buntaine MT, Mullen RB, Lassoie JP (2007) Human use and conservation planning in alpine areas of northwestern Yunnan, China. Environment, Development and Sustalnability 9(3): 305- 324. DOI: lO.lOO7/SlO668-oo6-9o25-8.
  • 8Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management 59(4): 265-278. DOI: lO.lOO6/ jema.2000.o373.
  • 9Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
  • 10Oxford, UK. Coffin AW (2007) From roadldll to road ecology: A review of the ecological effects of roads. Journal of Transport Geography 15(5): 396-406. DOI: lO.1O16/j.jtrangeo.2006.n.oo6.

同被引文献21

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部