期刊文献+

达芬奇外科系统肝脏肿瘤切除术临床总结 被引量:1

Clinical Summary of da Vinci Surgery System in Liver Tumor Resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨达芬奇外科系统肝脏肿瘤切除术的可行性、安全性及优势。方法回顾性分析瑞金医院普外科2010年3月30日至2013年8月15日期间进行的21例达芬奇外科系统肝脏肿瘤切除术患者的临床资料。结果2l例肝脏肿瘤患者中原发性肝癌13例,肝脏再生结节1例,转移性腺癌2例,肝脏平滑肌肉瘤2例,肝脏血管瘤3例。2l例达芬奇外科系统肝脏肿瘤切除术的手术时间为(156.67±92.19)min(60~480rain);术中出血量为(585.71±l076.12)mL(50-5000mL);术中输血4例(19.05%);中转手术共3例(14.29%),其中1例中转开腹(4.76%),2例中转为手助式腹腔镜(9.52%)。无术中并发症发生;术后并发胆瘘、腹腔感染各1例,均经保守治疗后痊愈。术后进餐时间为(3.23±1.26)d(2~6d);术后住院时间为(10.10±9.02)d(5~47d)。无二次手术及围手术期死亡患者。结论本研究人组的患者肿瘤类型多样,肿瘤位置复杂,操作难度较大,其结果提示达芬奇外科系统在肝脏肿瘤切除术中是安全、可靠的,且在很大程度上拓宽了腹腔镜下肝脏肿瘤切除术的适用范围。 Objective To discuss the feasibility, safety, and superiority of da Vinci surgery system (DVSS) in liver tumor resection. Method The clinical data of 21 patients who underwent DVSS in the liver tumor resection were analyzed retrospectively. Results There were 12 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 1 patient with cholang- iocellular carcinoma, l patient with hepatic cirrhosis regenerative nodule, 2 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma, 2 patients with leiomyosarcoma, and 3 patients with cavernous hemangioma. The operative time was (156. 67±92. 19) min (60-480 min), the intraoperative blood loss was (585.71± 076. 12) mL (50-5 000 mL), the time of diet recovery was (3. 234±1.26) d (2-6 d), and the hospital stay was (10. 10±9. 02) d (5-47 d). The hospital mortality and morbidity rates were 0 (0/21) and 9. 52% (2/21) respectively including 1 patient with biliary leakage and 1 patient with abdominal infection. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of DVSS in the liver tumor resection and the system has a wide range of application for patients who are suffering from liver tumor.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期146-149,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 达芬奇外科系统 微创外科 肝脏肿瘤 肝脏切除术 da Vinci surgery system Minimally invasivesurgery Liver tumor Hepatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1吴孟超,吴在德.外科机器人技术[A]//黄家驷外科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:229-231.
  • 2Packiam V, Bartlett DL, Tohme S, et al. Minimally invasive liver resection: robotic versus laparoscopic left lateral sectionec- tomy [J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2012, 16(12): 2233-2238.
  • 3Giulianotti PC, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, et al. Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy [J]. Transpl Int, 2012, 25(1): e5-e9.
  • 4Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes [ J ]. Arch Surg, 2011, 146(7): 844-850.
  • 5Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections [ J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(1): 29-39.
  • 6Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome [ J ]. Am J Surg, 2013, 205(6): 697-702.
  • 7Reggiani P, Antonelli B, Rossi G. Robotic surgery of the liver: Italian experience and review of the literature [J]. Ecancermedi- calsciance, 2013, 7: 358. doi: 10. 3332/ecancer. 2013. 358.
  • 8van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review [ J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(6): 1180-1190.
  • 9Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparos- copic hepatectomy: A matched comparison [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2013 Sep 16. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 10Boggi U, Caniglia F, Amorese G. Laparoscopie robot-assisted major hepatectomy [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2014, 21(1): 3-10.

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部