摘要
目的:观察经皮注入骨水泥(PVP)与保守治疗对骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的疗效。方法:将骨质疏松伴胸腰椎骨折患者80例随机分为经皮注入骨水泥组(I组)和保守治疗组(II组),每组40例,I组给予PVP治疗,II组给予卧床、补钙及口服促进骨折愈合药物等治疗。观察每组临床疗效和用药前后疼痛缓解程度及Cobb角的变化。结果:I组总有效率为97.5%与II组的95%(P>0.05)差别无统计学意义,治疗8周后,I组与II组Cobb角的变化无统计学意义。结论:经皮注入骨水泥与保守治疗对治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎骨折的疗效无显著差别。
Objective：To observe the effect of PVP and conservative treatment to remedy calcitonin in osteoporotic thoracolumbar frac -ture.M ethods：80 cases patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture were randomly divided into PVP group （ I group）and conservative treatment group（IIgroup）, each of 40 cases.I group treat with PVP.II group was given on bed and treatment such as oral promoting frac-ture healing drugs .Observed in each group before and after the clinical curative effect and the degree of pain relief and Cobb Angle chan -ges.Results：The total effective rate of I group （97.5%） was no significant difference between II group （ 95%） （ P 〉0.05）.8 weeks af-ter treatment, I and II group Cobb Angle change had no obvious difference .Conclusion：PVP and conservative treatment in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures had the curative effect of no significant difference .
出处
《中国伤残医学》
2014年第4期3-4,共2页
Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词
骨质疏松
胸腰椎骨折
PVP
保守治疗
Osteoporotic
Thoracolumbar vertebral fracture
PVP
Conservative treatment
