期刊文献+

试题难度的主观预估方法 被引量:9

Subjective Prediction Methods of Item Difficulty Estimation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 试题难度一般通过实际测试考生而获得,但这种预试方法的实施具有一定局限性。难度的主观预估方法无需依赖考生,主要由学科专家根据经验对试题难度进行预测,因此在中、高考等考试实践中受到广泛应用。在研究和实践中,研究者们不断完善主观预估法,并提出不同的估计方法。本文对传统的主观评判法与配对比较的难度估计法进行介绍,以期更系统地认识难度的主观预估方法,促进主观预估法在考试实践中的应用。 Item difficulty is usually cotnated by field test, which has some limits in practice. Subjective prediction of item difficulty doesn't need real examinees, these approaches obtain estimates mainly depending on the subject experts' experience, So subjective prediction approaches are widely applied in many test programs. And researches have proposed different subjective prediction methods based on research and test practice. This article attemps to review two of those methods systematically: direct prediction of item difficulty by experts, paired comparison method, then put forwards some advice on future directions and implementation of the methods in practice.
出处 《中国考试》 2014年第2期3-9,共7页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 试题难度 主观预估 主观评判法 配对比较 Iitem Difficulty Subjective Prediction Direct 'Prediction of Item Difficulty by Experts PairedComparison Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Bejar,I. I. Subject matter experts" assessment of item statistics[J].Applied Psychological Measurement, 1983(3) : 303-310.
  • 2Embretson, S. E. Generating abstract reasoning item with cognitivetheory. In S. H. Irvine, & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation fortest development (pp. 219 - 250) [C]. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum Associates Publishers. 2002.
  • 3Farmer, E. Concerning the subjective judgement of difficulty[J].British Journal of Psychology, 1928(18) : 438-442.
  • 4Gorin, J. S., & Embretson, S. E. Item difficulty modeling of para-graph comprehension items[J]. Applied Psychological Measure-ment, 2006,30(5):395-411.
  • 5Ozaki, K., & Toyoda, H. A Paired comparison 1RT model by 3-val-ue judgment: Estimation of item parameters prior to the administra-tion of the test[J]. Behaviormetrika, 2006(33) : 131-147.
  • 6Ozaki, K” & Toyoda, H. Item difficulty parameter estimation usingthe idea of the graded response model and computerized adaptivetestingfj], Japanese Psychological Research, 2009,51(1): 1-12.
  • 7Perkins, K., Gupta, L. & Tammana, R. Predicting item diffic'uity ina reading comprehension test with an artificial neural nelwork[J].Language Testing, 1995,12(2) : 34-53.
  • 8Quereshi, M.Y. & Fisher, T. L. Logical versus empirical estimatesof item difficullyfj]. Educational and Psychological Measurement,1977(37):91-100.
  • 9Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgemetil[J]. Psy-chological Review,34 : 273-286.
  • 10van der Linden, W. J. The changing conception of measuremenl ineducation and psyc:hology[J]. applied psychological measurement ,1986,10(4):325-332.

二级参考文献91

共引文献136

同被引文献113

引证文献9

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部